Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

The Tide Turns: Britain's Policy Squeeze Is Sending 20,000 Hong Kong People Home

Blog

The Tide Turns: Britain's Policy Squeeze Is Sending 20,000 Hong Kong People Home
Blog

Blog

The Tide Turns: Britain's Policy Squeeze Is Sending 20,000 Hong Kong People Home

2026-02-24 11:09 Last Updated At:11:09

The Year of the Horse is off to a gallop – and it may be carrying Hong Kong people home.

Local wisdom holds that Bingwu (丙午), the most fire-charged year in the 60-year Chinese calendar cycle, is uniquely auspicious for Hong Kong, a city said to thrive on fire energy. Fire means celebration and confidence: tourists arrive in droves, and those who left are drawn back. Astrology, of course, deserves only a pinch of salt. But the objective data is telling exactly the same story.

Over 20,000 Hong Kong BNO holders in the UK are eyeing a return. Some have already slipped back and restarted in Hong Kong — and the real number could run higher.

Over 20,000 Hong Kong BNO holders in the UK are eyeing a return. Some have already slipped back and restarted in Hong Kong — and the real number could run higher.

A new survey finds that if the UK government goes ahead with tightening permanent residency requirements, 12.8% of Hong Kong BNO holders surveyed would return to Hong Kong – that is roughly 21,000 people. BBC and local media have already spoken with returnees who have quietly slipped back from Britain to Hong Kong, and the real count is climbing well past 20,000. Across the Pacific, the picture mirrors itself: many Hong Kong people who boarded the so-called "lifeboat" to Canada are watching their permanent residency applications drag on indefinitely, stranded between two shores – and more are cutting their losses and heading home.

The UK government has been tightening the screws on new migrants seeking Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). The new requirements include raising English language standards and imposing income thresholds – a package the Home Office is branding "earned settlement." A public consultation on whether Hong Kong BNO visa holders will be exempted from these new requirements has just wrapped up, and the verdict is imminent. For Hong Kong people already living in the UK, the suspense is grinding – sleep is hard to come by, and contingency plans are quietly being drawn up.

Four Hong Kong community organisations surveyed 1,725 Hong Kong BNO holders and asked one direct question: if ILR is no longer certain, what next? The results are sobering. A full 27.6% said they would leave the UK. Of that group, 12.8% would return to Hong Kong, while 14.8% would try to relocate to another country. With more than 170,000 Hong Kong BNO holders now resident in the UK, that 12.8% translates to roughly 21,000 people making the journey home.

Seeking to land in another country? Around 25,000 people have that idea – but the welcome mat is not out anywhere. Canada, like most destinations, has pulled back on immigration. Finding a new country to call home is genuinely difficult, and many of those 25,000 may ultimately discover they have run out of options. Hong Kong becomes the only door still open. Twenty thousand returnees is therefore the conservative case; the real number will almost certainly be far higher.

No Way Out but Home

Make no mistake: the deeper you look, the starker the numbers become. A UK Member of Parliament surveyed over 6,000 Hong Kong BNO holders and found that 43% of families cannot meet the new requirements. The road ahead is blocked, and those who remain will find daily life increasingly difficult. The survey bears that out: only 22% of respondents said they would "definitely stay in the UK." The others have already decided to find a way out. They have not moved yet simply because the moment has not arrived.

Some Hong Kong people stopped waiting long ago. BBC recently sat down with one returnee who spent three years in the UK and now drives a taxi in Hong Kong. He speaks candidly about the crushing depression that shadowed his time in Britain – a darkness so severe he contemplated suicide, as though he had fallen into a black abyss with no way out. He had planned to endure another three years to obtain British citizenship, caught in a relentless internal debate over staying or leaving. Then came the night he was violently attacked at the restaurant where he worked. The evidence was clear-cut. Police made no arrest even after a full year. That was the moment his faith in British rule of law and human rights gave out entirely. With no reason left to stay, he made his decision. "It was as if I had woken up from a dream – and I have found a whole new meaning of 'home.'"

Online media outlet Kinliu spoke with another returnee who arrived in the UK on a BNO visa at the end of 2024 and was back in Hong Kong just eight months later, now working in the IT sector. From the ground, the reasons for return are a perfect storm: economic pressure, a brutal job market, shifting policies, public safety concerns, and the relentless grind of adapting to life abroad. The cost of living is punishing. Income tax exceeds 30%, and even decent jobs paying £4,000 to £7,000 a month leave precious little once taxes, rent, and daily expenses are stripped out.

And getting hired in the first place is a battle of its own. This returnee sent out 100 applications across the IT sector over six months and received nothing. His decision to return had nothing to do with the ILR policy debate; it was the relentless weight of economic pressure that made the choice for him. Britain, for him, simply was not working.

A Job Market That Won't Budge

Employment conditions across the UK are deteriorating, and the numbers are unambiguous. The unemployment rate hit 5.2% in the fourth quarter of last year – the highest reading since January 2021 – as companies have sharply pulled back on hiring. For Hong Kong BNO holders already struggling to clear income thresholds, a contracting labor market is the final, brutal complication. More and more are arriving at the same conclusion: time to go home.

And it is not just Britain. Canada's Hong Kong reverse migration tide is accelerating, driven by a clear and deliberate policy choice: the Canadian government has intentionally slowed permanent residency processing to suppress overall immigration numbers. Hong Kong people who boarded that Canadian "lifeboat" are among the very first to feel the squeeze.

Canada’s “lifeboat” is stuck in limbo. With PR waits stretching out, more Hong Kong people are quitting the queue and heading home. Pictured: a Hong Kong immigrant advocacy group protests outside Canada’s immigration ministry.

Canada’s “lifeboat” is stuck in limbo. With PR waits stretching out, more Hong Kong people are quitting the queue and heading home. Pictured: a Hong Kong immigrant advocacy group protests outside Canada’s immigration ministry.

The figures from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) are damning. As of end-October last year, the two streams of the Hong Kong Pathway had taken in 42,040 permanent residency applications – but only 13,520 had been processed, leaving a massive, growing backlog. Estimates now put outstanding applications at 55,000 by 2027, with wait times stretching to a decade. For Hong Kong people marooned on that lifeboat – caught between two worlds, watching their best years tick away – more and more are drawing the same conclusion: stop waiting, turn back, and start over in Hong Kong.

Years ago, Hong Kong people left in waves for Britain and Canada. Now the world has turned full circle. The Year of the Horse has brought a genuine reversal of the tide, and this "reverse migration wave" is proof that Hong Kong is far from finished – it remains a city full of life and possibility. For Hong Kong people worn down in a foreign land – the tired bird that at last finds its way home – that is, when all is said and done, something to welcome.




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Trump is a master of staging a "television reality show," and his nationwide address this morning was filled with theatrical flair. His chief aim was to impress the American public with a sense that the US military wields overwhelming power—decimating a longtime foe threatening the nation—and that he alone leads this victorious force.
 
Yet the specifics—actual battlefield gains, ceasefire timing, negotiation progress, next steps, or reopening the Strait of Hormuz—were all vague or glossed over. Trump carefully crafted narrative designed to build a grand finale for his imminent exit.

Trump’s war speech sold a big win. US media saw big gaps.

Trump’s war speech sold a big win. US media saw big gaps.


 
The New York Times, ever sharp, reviewed the string of dazzling claims he made and found several numbers heavily exaggerated. Reuters also noted that on several unresolved issues, Trump skimmed past or ignored them altogether, apparently trying to avoid the impression of unfinished or failed efforts.

Trump’s message selection was clearly intentional. He emphasized the war lasted about 30 days and culminated in a massive victory, contrasting this with the long, grueling Vietnam and Iraq Wars—to showcase strength and efficiency. Yet whether the US actually won remains mostly rhetoric. The New York Times compared his cited achievements with reality and found stark contradictions.
 
Negotiation Claims vs. Reality
First, Trump claimed negotiations with Iran were ongoing and had earlier said Iran was "begging" for a ceasefire. The New York Times reported that Iran’s government clearly stated it had no intention of substantive talks and denied requesting a ceasefire. Trump’s claim that "progress has been made in talks" was false. The paper cited US intelligence officials who assessed that Iran is not currently ready to reach an agreement.

Iran’s tough negotiating stance reflects its belief that it holds the upper hand in the conflict and is in no hurry for peace. It also deeply distrusts the United States, viewing Trump as unpredictable and lacking sincerity in negotiations.
 
Military Impact on Iran Questioned
Second, Trump asserted that the US military has severely weakened Iran's missile and drone launch capabilities, destroying large missile stockpiles and production facilities, thereby dismantling the military threat.
 
However, The New York Times reported that Iran still maintains a substantial arsenal of missiles and a significant number of drones. This enables Iran to continue recent attacks against Israel and Gulf countries. Earlier, Reuters cited US internal assessments showing that the US-Israel coalition has destroyed only about 30% of Iran's missiles. Another 30% have unknown status, while the remaining missiles remain intact—indicating Iran retains a considerable missile inventory.

Trump said Iran was crippled. Its missile stocks say otherwise.

Trump said Iran was crippled. Its missile stocks say otherwise.


 
Third, Trump claims that US military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities have achieved "great success," eliminating the nuclear threat to the United States.
 
The New York Times however, cites sources revealing that a stock of enriched uranium remains stored in tunnels and was not destroyed. The effectiveness of the June airstrike on the nuclear site last year remains unclear. As a result, the claim of " Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated" cannot be verified.

False Regime Change Claims
Fourth, Trump claimed that Iran's original leaders have all been eliminated and replaced by a new group of moderates, signaling that a "regime change" has taken place. Although he no longer names regime overthrow as a goal, by emphasizing this point he clearly implies "that objective has also been accomplished."
 
The New York Times strongly contradicted this, noting that the current government still wields significant authority and maintains full control over the country. Its "anti-American" stance remains unshaken as it continues to lead the "resistance against America." Trump also boasted that "the command structure of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is being weakened", another exaggerated claim of a major victory.

Ignored Issues and Vagueness
Beyond boasting about major achievements, Trump glosses over unresolved issues and brushes them aside with vague assurances.
 
Reuters noted that while he had previously pressured Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz—threatening warship escorts and even deployment of ground forces—this time he omits that from stated objectives, merely saying that once the conflict ends, Iran will naturally reopen the strait.
 
Moreover, Trump offers no concrete plan for handling Iran's enriched uranium. The so-called elimination of the nuclear threat remains empty rhetoric—talk that sounds like action but delivers nothing.
 
US media also highlight that Trump fails to clarify what comes next, including whether ground troops will be sent, leaving these questions unanswered. His bluster about "bombing Iran back to the Stone Age" reads as mere bravado aimed at strengthening his negotiation position. Having dealt with him repeatedly, Iran sees through these tactics and remains calm and unfazed. 
 
In his nationwide address today, Trump listed a series of "brilliant achievements" against Iran to showcase the "great victories" the United States has won under his leadership—victories unseen in years. However, as several media outlets have pointed out, many of these claims are blown out of proportion. It’s like a struggling CEO who inflates the company’s results to reassure shareholders—here, the audience being the public.
 
What he’s doing is easy to understand: this war is teetering on the edge of collapse, and he has to set up a way to exit with some grace.
 
Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles