Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Four Anti-China Factions Crushed in Embassy Battle—But They're Not Done Yet

Blog

Four Anti-China Factions Crushed in Embassy Battle—But They're Not Done Yet
Blog

Blog

Four Anti-China Factions Crushed in Embassy Battle—But They're Not Done Yet

2026-01-22 16:22 Last Updated At:16:22

There's an old saying: the righteous build, the wicked destroy. When evil loses to good, we celebrate. China's plan to construct its UK embassy weathered relentless attacks and delays, yet finally got its approval from the British government.

The saboteurs suffered a crushing defeat—yet they refuse to accept it and are already plotting their next moves. Who exactly are these saboteurs? Those tracking the situation identify four distinct factions of troublemakers operating both publicly and in the shadows. Each with different motives and backgrounds, they share one unifying obsession: anti-China sentiment. This same dark force hovers over Hong Kong, waiting for opportunities to stir up fresh chaos.

Anti-China factions converged—2019 rioters, Tibetan, Xinjiang, and Taiwan separatists, each with their own agenda.

Anti-China factions converged—2019 rioters, Tibetan, Xinjiang, and Taiwan separatists, each with their own agenda.

Washington's Shadow Campaign

Start with the puppeteers pulling strings from behind the curtain. British media exposés reveal that senior US national security officials secretly interfered with Britain's embassy approval process, applying pressure repeatedly.

Over a year ago, senior White House National Security Council members sent messages to British counterparts expressing "concerns" about the project, claiming the new embassy posed "security risks" and demanding British intelligence agencies report to Washington on the matter. Under this pressure, British authorities stalled and delayed its approval.

British media sources further revealed that even after Britain submitted a risk assessment to the Five Eyes alliance stating that communications risks from the new embassy would be manageable, officials from the White House, State Department, and US Embassy in London descended on the British capital en masse. They held three separate meetings with British officials to question security risks all over again. Until recently, US officials continued expressing opposition through various channels, maintaining relentless pressure.

But Prime Minister Keir Starmer is determined to repair relations with China, and pursue stronger cooperation in trade and finance to revitalize Britain's moribund economy. He therefore stood firm against US pressure and ultimately gave the green light to the embassy construction plan.

The Usual Anti-China Suspects

The second faction consists of British politicians with anti-China written all over their faces—several already placed on China's sanctions list. These include former Conservative Party leader Iain Duncan Smith, former UK Security Minister Tom Tugendhat, and Benedict Rogers, founder of the Hong Kong-meddling organization Hong Kong Watch.

Current MP Iain Duncan Smith masterminded support for the 2019 violence and even traveled to Taiwan to curry favor with independence movement leaders. Recently, he ignited calls to "sanction Hong Kong judges."

During protests against China's embassy construction, he repeatedly stood in solidarity with demonstrators and persuaded current Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch to appear at a recent protest, dragging the Conservative Party into murky waters.

Tom Tugendhat is equally hawkish. He has consistently exaggerated the "national security threat" posed by Chinese tech companies to Britain, claiming even DeepSeek presents security risks while loudly advocating for Xinjiang independence. His "China threat theory" has become his primary argument against China's new embassy construction, which he has trumpeted repeatedly in Parliament and the media.

As for Benedict Rogers, he is a longtime associate and contact of Jimmy Lai, already notorious in Hong Kong circles. In this campaign against China's embassy construction, he has led from the front, joining other anti-China MPs in attacking Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

British politicians and U.S. officials pressured from all angles. Pictured: Benedict Rogers pushing "China threat" rhetoric in front of Hong Kong independence flags.

British politicians and U.S. officials pressured from all angles. Pictured: Benedict Rogers pushing "China threat" rhetoric in front of Hong Kong independence flags.

2019 Rioters Replay Their Act

The third faction is the familiar sight of Hong Kong BNO holders who fled to the UK after the 2019 Black Riots. They served as "foot soldiers" in the past nine protests, each time wearing all-black "combat gear" and waving Hong Kong independence flags, recreating the scenes of 2019 violence on London streets.

While they may have satisfied their "protest addiction," they also risk deportation, as their every move is monitored by British national security personnel. When they apply for permanent residence in the future, they may be "filtered out" due to this black mark on their record.

Among all the factions, the fourth is the most inflammatory and controversial—Tibetan independence, Xinjiang independence, and Taiwan independence activists.

At every protest, they wave independence flags and even stomp on the Chinese national flag and portraits of Chinese leaders. Behind the scenes, they coordinate with British politicians, forming an anti-China alliance.

Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch actually appeared on stage with the mob—an act of supreme stupidity and extreme danger.

The Last-Ditch Legal Gambit

With the British government's approval of China's embassy construction plan, the four factions of troublemakers have suffered a crushing defeat and major setback. But they will not give up. They are now planning a "legal move"—filing for judicial review with the courts. If the application is accepted, they can continue their flag-waving and apply pressure on the judiciary.

The reality is stark: the Labour government has already approved the plan, and both major intelligence agencies have given the green light. Even if they refuse to accept defeat and want to rematch, that ship has most likely sailed.

Lai Ting-yiu




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

The playbook is a KK Park textbook fraud. First, the scammer pretends to be your friend: "I'm helping you." Next comes the special treatment, the VIP access. Then the irresistible benefits pile up—hurry, don't miss this golden opportunity. Victims take the bait, and the trap snaps shut.

When Britain announced yesterday it would expand the BNO visa scheme to include those born after 1997, the resemblance to that con artist's manual was impossible to ignore. London wraps itself in moral rhetoric—shouldering responsibility to Hong Kong people, protecting a new generation's human rights—but the reality is colder. The UK government is using Hong Kong youth to plug the gaping hole left by its own skilled worker exodus. The calculation is ruthless, and transparent.

The timing tells you everything. Hours after Jimmy Lai received a 20-year prison sentence, Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper issued her predictable call for the Hong Kong government to "end his appalling ordeal” and “release him on humanitarian grounds". It was pure theater, designed to appease anti-China hawks. 

Then came the main act: the BNO expansion announcement, deliberately linked to Lai's sentencing. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood delivered the sugar-coated explanation—Hong Kong's deteriorating human rights situation requires Britain to widen the lifeboat, letting more families "start new lives".

British Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood sells the post-1997 BNO expansion as opportunity—but it looks more like a KK Park Job Scam.

British Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood sells the post-1997 BNO expansion as opportunity—but it looks more like a KK Park Job Scam.

Political insiders see through it. London had this expansion ready for months. They simply waited for the perfect political moment—Lai's sentencing—to deploy it as cover. The move relieves pressure from anti-China factions while wrapping British self-interest in a moral disguise.

The Economic Calculation

The "we're helping you" rhetoric fits the scam template perfectly. Strip away the moral posturing, and you find cold economic logic: Britain needs young, educated Hong Kong people to fill its talent vacuum. These arrivals plug labor gaps immediately, yet receive no welfare or education subsidies. For the UK government, it's risk-free arbitrage—maximum return, zero downside.

To understand Britain's desperation, look at the numbers. In 2024 alone, 257,000 British nationals emigrated. Most were aged 18 to 49—prime working age—and over 45% held university degrees and high level skills. These are the professionals who drive productivity and innovation.

The exodus started years ago and keeps accelerating. Between 2021 and 2024, nearly 992,000 people left the country. The 2024 figure—250,000—hit a record high. Four forces push them out: crushing taxes, stagnant incomes, relentless inflation, and sky-high housing costs. Mid-to-high-tier professionals are fleeing to markets that offer better pay and lower living expenses. The healthcare sector exemplifies the crisis: roughly 4,000 doctors left in 2024, pushing medical staff shortages to dangerous levels.

While high-end talent drains away, skilled worker visa applications have collapsed—and refugee arrivals have surged. The displacement is stark. Between September 2023 and September 2024, skilled worker immigration dropped from 75,000 to 57,000. Bad money drives out good, and Britain's talent pipeline is clogging.

The Hidden Upside

The British government knows exactly how dire this is, so it engineered a "solution". Expanding BNO eligibility to those born after 1997 targets Hong Kong people in their late twenties—educated, experienced, and work-ready. They're tailor-made replacements for the missing mid-to-high-end workforce. Officials estimate roughly 26,000 will migrate over the next five years.

These arrivals deliver instant value. They enter the labor force immediately, bring capital to buy or rent property, and boost consumer spending—all without accessing welfare benefits. The deal gets even sweeter. Under the "5+1" pathway, migrants must live in the UK for five years before applying for permanent residency. That gives the government time to cherry-pick "contributors" and filter out anyone with low earnings or weak job performance. By the time those deemed "low-end labor" realize they've been played, it's too late.

But will Hong Kong's younger generation actually take the bait? That's far from certain. Nearly 170,000 Hong Kong people who emigrated under the BNO scheme after 2021 are already feeling burned. London abruptly "moved the goalposts" last year by toughening permanent residency requirements—imposing new income thresholds and English proficiency standards. Many now openly call the scheme "a complete scam". That bitter lesson will make the post-1997 generation far more cautious. They won't be fooled so easily again.

Nearly 170,000 Hong Kong BNO migrants since 2021 now talk of feeling duped by shifting rules—a warning shot to the post-1997 generation.

Nearly 170,000 Hong Kong BNO migrants since 2021 now talk of feeling duped by shifting rules—a warning shot to the post-1997 generation.

What Say You?

Recommended Articles