Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Jimmy Lai’s HK$1.6 billion “Chaos-stirring Funds”: Who Gave Him the Money?

Blog

Jimmy Lai’s HK$1.6 billion “Chaos-stirring Funds”: Who Gave Him the Money?
Blog

Blog

Jimmy Lai’s HK$1.6 billion “Chaos-stirring Funds”: Who Gave Him the Money?

2026-02-10 09:02 Last Updated At:09:02

When you play with fire, you’re bound to get burned. After years of stirring up trouble, Jimmy Lai has finally reached the moment of reckoning. Following a 156-day trial that examined 2,200 pieces of evidence and over 80,000 pages of documents, the judge sentenced him to 20 years in prison today. “The evidence is conclusive, and the punishment fits the crime”, as people say. However, this is not the end of the story. Chief Superintendent Li Guilua of the Police National Security Department noted that while the trial phase has concluded, the investigation is still ongoing.

Jimmy Lai was sentenced on Feb 9, bringing the case to a close, yet two major mysteries remain unresolved. The first is the mysterious source of billions of Hong Kong dollars in foreign “chaos-stirring funds” that flowed into his bank accounts. The identity of this mysterious financial pipeline warrants continued investigation.

Jimmy Lai was sentenced on Feb 9, bringing the case to a close, yet two major mysteries remain unresolved. The first is the mysterious source of billions of Hong Kong dollars in foreign “chaos-stirring funds” that flowed into his bank accounts. The identity of this mysterious financial pipeline warrants continued investigation.

As I reviewed the case materials and information from various sources, at least two major mysteries remain unresolved. First, the origin of the HK$1.6 billion in black money funneled into Hong Kong through Jimmy Lai remains unclear. These mysterious funding channels have been pumping money in for a long time, which is highly suspicious.

Second, during the “black violence” period, rumors emerge that Lai allegedly collaborated with “financial crocodile” George Soros to trigger a financial crisis. Soros ultimately retreated; the truth of what happened deserves further investigation.

The trial of Jimmy Lai’s case revealed an immense amount of information, uncovering many secrets unknown to the public, particularly details about his fund flows that were shocking. In January 2024, the police submitted a financial investigation report on Jimmy Lai to the court. It stated that his assistant, Mark Simon, received transfer totaling HK$118 million from his boss between 2013 and 2020, of which approximately HK$93 million was transferred in multiple batches to various opposition figures and political parties.

This is only the visible part of the funding; the actual amount might be larger. Next Digital was not a highly profitable company at the time, yet it continued to heavily fund opposition groups and those creating chaos in Hong Kong, clearly indicating a steady source of funds behind it.

The Police’s financial investigation found that Jimmy Lai held two personal bank accounts in Hong Kong and jointly controlled nine company accounts registered or operating in Hong Kong with Mark Simon. These accounts collectively received deposits of HK$2.945 billion, nearly 60% (over HK$1.6 billion) of which originated from the United States, Canada, and Taiwan.

Thus, it’s evident that during that period, there was a continuous inflow of funds from various sources into his multiple accounts. What organizations or individuals provided this money remains an unresolved mystery.

Beyond funding pan-democratic parties and politicians, he also financed related actions during Hong Kong’s unrest. For example, during the 2019 anti-extradition bill riots, he specially donated an additional HK$15 million to the organizers.

Moreover, between 2019 and 2020, he lent HK$500 million to Next Media through shareholder loans, allowing Apple Daily to continue its “inciting” functions. These funds were also transferred from his accounts, similarly, originating from mysterious overseas sources.

Lai employed various methods to convert “foreign financial aid” into “chaos-stirring funds in Hong Kong.” A friend knowing him well told me that in 2019, he allocated some Next Media shares to an American fund, obtaining a sum of money believed to be used for political purposes.

Additionally, with the backing of Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, he purchased large plots of land in Taipei’s Neihu District at low prices. Starting in 2013, he gradually sold these lands and properties at higher prices, making substantial profits that supported Apple Daily in Hong Kong and Taiwan and continued to fund Hong Kong ‘s opposition. During those years, he maintained close ties with Tsai Ing-wen, frequently holding secret meetings to discuss strategies for Hong Kong and introducing American military and political figures to her. The DPP also knew that the more chaotic Hong Kong was, the more beneficial it would be for “pro-independence” elements, and thus provided support in various ways, including economic benefits.

Lai maintained close ties with Taiwan’s Tsai Ing-wen. Since the Hong Kong unrest benefited pro-independence factions, it is plausible that benefits, including profits from real estate, were provided to Lai to turn them into “chaos-stirring funds”.

Lai maintained close ties with Taiwan’s Tsai Ing-wen. Since the Hong Kong unrest benefited pro-independence factions, it is plausible that benefits, including profits from real estate, were provided to Lai to turn them into “chaos-stirring funds”.

Even more peculiar is that a year before the “Occupy Central” movement, with the help of former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Lai met with high-level officials in Myanmar’s military and government to prepare for real estate investments. After establishing this “financial pipeline”, he stood to make significant profits. This was an indirect way for American political figures to help him open funding channels.

As for the second mystery, it is equally bizarre. In August 2019, as Hong Kong’s riots escalated and the stock market fluctuated, rumors emerged that the anti-communist “financial crocodile” George Soros had taken massive short positions in the stock market. Lai, in turn, echoed these moves by continuing to incite unrest. If social turmoil worsened and the stock market crashed, he would have profited immensely. Fortunately, the situation temporarily eased, and the stock market rebounded. When trading resumed the next day, the Hong Kong stock market continued to rise, causing the “crocodile” to suffer significant losses and forcing a hasty retreat.

Whether this brief financial crisis was related to Jimmy Lai remains an unsolved mystery. However, the “Open Society Foundations” founded by Soros are known to be a driving force behind color revolutions, and he has long been hostile towards China. Thus, it is not impossible that he collaborated with like-minded Jimmy Lai to stir up trouble, taking advantage of the chaos to trigger a financial storm and pursue massive profits.

Although the trial of Jimmy Lai has concluded, many hidden secrets remain unrevealed, potentially involving more individuals and organizations. If the police and media continue to investigate, an even more shocking and larger conspiracy may come to light.




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Trump is a master of staging a "television reality show," and his nationwide address this morning was filled with theatrical flair. His chief aim was to impress the American public with a sense that the US military wields overwhelming power—decimating a longtime foe threatening the nation—and that he alone leads this victorious force.
 
Yet the specifics—actual battlefield gains, ceasefire timing, negotiation progress, next steps, or reopening the Strait of Hormuz—were all vague or glossed over. Trump carefully crafted narrative designed to build a grand finale for his imminent exit.

Trump’s war speech sold a big win. US media saw big gaps.

Trump’s war speech sold a big win. US media saw big gaps.


 
The New York Times, ever sharp, reviewed the string of dazzling claims he made and found several numbers heavily exaggerated. Reuters also noted that on several unresolved issues, Trump skimmed past or ignored them altogether, apparently trying to avoid the impression of unfinished or failed efforts.

Trump’s message selection was clearly intentional. He emphasized the war lasted about 30 days and culminated in a massive victory, contrasting this with the long, grueling Vietnam and Iraq Wars—to showcase strength and efficiency. Yet whether the US actually won remains mostly rhetoric. The New York Times compared his cited achievements with reality and found stark contradictions.
 
Negotiation Claims vs. Reality
First, Trump claimed negotiations with Iran were ongoing and had earlier said Iran was "begging" for a ceasefire. The New York Times reported that Iran’s government clearly stated it had no intention of substantive talks and denied requesting a ceasefire. Trump’s claim that "progress has been made in talks" was false. The paper cited US intelligence officials who assessed that Iran is not currently ready to reach an agreement.

Iran’s tough negotiating stance reflects its belief that it holds the upper hand in the conflict and is in no hurry for peace. It also deeply distrusts the United States, viewing Trump as unpredictable and lacking sincerity in negotiations.
 
Military Impact on Iran Questioned
Second, Trump asserted that the US military has severely weakened Iran's missile and drone launch capabilities, destroying large missile stockpiles and production facilities, thereby dismantling the military threat.
 
However, The New York Times reported that Iran still maintains a substantial arsenal of missiles and a significant number of drones. This enables Iran to continue recent attacks against Israel and Gulf countries. Earlier, Reuters cited US internal assessments showing that the US-Israel coalition has destroyed only about 30% of Iran's missiles. Another 30% have unknown status, while the remaining missiles remain intact—indicating Iran retains a considerable missile inventory.

Trump said Iran was crippled. Its missile stocks say otherwise.

Trump said Iran was crippled. Its missile stocks say otherwise.


 
Third, Trump claims that US military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities have achieved "great success," eliminating the nuclear threat to the United States.
 
The New York Times however, cites sources revealing that a stock of enriched uranium remains stored in tunnels and was not destroyed. The effectiveness of the June airstrike on the nuclear site last year remains unclear. As a result, the claim of " Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated" cannot be verified.

False Regime Change Claims
Fourth, Trump claimed that Iran's original leaders have all been eliminated and replaced by a new group of moderates, signaling that a "regime change" has taken place. Although he no longer names regime overthrow as a goal, by emphasizing this point he clearly implies "that objective has also been accomplished."
 
The New York Times strongly contradicted this, noting that the current government still wields significant authority and maintains full control over the country. Its "anti-American" stance remains unshaken as it continues to lead the "resistance against America." Trump also boasted that "the command structure of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is being weakened", another exaggerated claim of a major victory.

Ignored Issues and Vagueness
Beyond boasting about major achievements, Trump glosses over unresolved issues and brushes them aside with vague assurances.
 
Reuters noted that while he had previously pressured Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz—threatening warship escorts and even deployment of ground forces—this time he omits that from stated objectives, merely saying that once the conflict ends, Iran will naturally reopen the strait.
 
Moreover, Trump offers no concrete plan for handling Iran's enriched uranium. The so-called elimination of the nuclear threat remains empty rhetoric—talk that sounds like action but delivers nothing.
 
US media also highlight that Trump fails to clarify what comes next, including whether ground troops will be sent, leaving these questions unanswered. His bluster about "bombing Iran back to the Stone Age" reads as mere bravado aimed at strengthening his negotiation position. Having dealt with him repeatedly, Iran sees through these tactics and remains calm and unfazed. 
 
In his nationwide address today, Trump listed a series of "brilliant achievements" against Iran to showcase the "great victories" the United States has won under his leadership—victories unseen in years. However, as several media outlets have pointed out, many of these claims are blown out of proportion. It’s like a struggling CEO who inflates the company’s results to reassure shareholders—here, the audience being the public.
 
What he’s doing is easy to understand: this war is teetering on the edge of collapse, and he has to set up a way to exit with some grace.
 
Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles