Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Jimmy Lai’s HK$1.6 billion “Chaos-stirring Funds”: Who Gave Him the Money?

Blog

Jimmy Lai’s HK$1.6 billion “Chaos-stirring Funds”: Who Gave Him the Money?
Blog

Blog

Jimmy Lai’s HK$1.6 billion “Chaos-stirring Funds”: Who Gave Him the Money?

2026-02-10 09:02 Last Updated At:09:02

When you play with fire, you’re bound to get burned. After years of stirring up trouble, Jimmy Lai has finally reached the moment of reckoning. Following a 156-day trial that examined 2,200 pieces of evidence and over 80,000 pages of documents, the judge sentenced him to 20 years in prison today. “The evidence is conclusive, and the punishment fits the crime”, as people say. However, this is not the end of the story. Chief Superintendent Li Guilua of the Police National Security Department noted that while the trial phase has concluded, the investigation is still ongoing.

Jimmy Lai was sentenced on Feb 9, bringing the case to a close, yet two major mysteries remain unresolved. The first is the mysterious source of billions of Hong Kong dollars in foreign “chaos-stirring funds” that flowed into his bank accounts. The identity of this mysterious financial pipeline warrants continued investigation.

Jimmy Lai was sentenced on Feb 9, bringing the case to a close, yet two major mysteries remain unresolved. The first is the mysterious source of billions of Hong Kong dollars in foreign “chaos-stirring funds” that flowed into his bank accounts. The identity of this mysterious financial pipeline warrants continued investigation.

As I reviewed the case materials and information from various sources, at least two major mysteries remain unresolved. First, the origin of the HK$1.6 billion in black money funneled into Hong Kong through Jimmy Lai remains unclear. These mysterious funding channels have been pumping money in for a long time, which is highly suspicious.

Second, during the “black violence” period, rumors emerge that Lai allegedly collaborated with “financial crocodile” George Soros to trigger a financial crisis. Soros ultimately retreated; the truth of what happened deserves further investigation.

The trial of Jimmy Lai’s case revealed an immense amount of information, uncovering many secrets unknown to the public, particularly details about his fund flows that were shocking. In January 2024, the police submitted a financial investigation report on Jimmy Lai to the court. It stated that his assistant, Mark Simon, received transfer totaling HK$118 million from his boss between 2013 and 2020, of which approximately HK$93 million was transferred in multiple batches to various opposition figures and political parties.

This is only the visible part of the funding; the actual amount might be larger. Next Digital was not a highly profitable company at the time, yet it continued to heavily fund opposition groups and those creating chaos in Hong Kong, clearly indicating a steady source of funds behind it.

The Police’s financial investigation found that Jimmy Lai held two personal bank accounts in Hong Kong and jointly controlled nine company accounts registered or operating in Hong Kong with Mark Simon. These accounts collectively received deposits of HK$2.945 billion, nearly 60% (over HK$1.6 billion) of which originated from the United States, Canada, and Taiwan.

Thus, it’s evident that during that period, there was a continuous inflow of funds from various sources into his multiple accounts. What organizations or individuals provided this money remains an unresolved mystery.

Beyond funding pan-democratic parties and politicians, he also financed related actions during Hong Kong’s unrest. For example, during the 2019 anti-extradition bill riots, he specially donated an additional HK$15 million to the organizers.

Moreover, between 2019 and 2020, he lent HK$500 million to Next Media through shareholder loans, allowing Apple Daily to continue its “inciting” functions. These funds were also transferred from his accounts, similarly, originating from mysterious overseas sources.

Lai employed various methods to convert “foreign financial aid” into “chaos-stirring funds in Hong Kong.” A friend knowing him well told me that in 2019, he allocated some Next Media shares to an American fund, obtaining a sum of money believed to be used for political purposes.

Additionally, with the backing of Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, he purchased large plots of land in Taipei’s Neihu District at low prices. Starting in 2013, he gradually sold these lands and properties at higher prices, making substantial profits that supported Apple Daily in Hong Kong and Taiwan and continued to fund Hong Kong ‘s opposition. During those years, he maintained close ties with Tsai Ing-wen, frequently holding secret meetings to discuss strategies for Hong Kong and introducing American military and political figures to her. The DPP also knew that the more chaotic Hong Kong was, the more beneficial it would be for “pro-independence” elements, and thus provided support in various ways, including economic benefits.

Lai maintained close ties with Taiwan’s Tsai Ing-wen. Since the Hong Kong unrest benefited pro-independence factions, it is plausible that benefits, including profits from real estate, were provided to Lai to turn them into “chaos-stirring funds”.

Lai maintained close ties with Taiwan’s Tsai Ing-wen. Since the Hong Kong unrest benefited pro-independence factions, it is plausible that benefits, including profits from real estate, were provided to Lai to turn them into “chaos-stirring funds”.

Even more peculiar is that a year before the “Occupy Central” movement, with the help of former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Lai met with high-level officials in Myanmar’s military and government to prepare for real estate investments. After establishing this “financial pipeline”, he stood to make significant profits. This was an indirect way for American political figures to help him open funding channels.

As for the second mystery, it is equally bizarre. In August 2019, as Hong Kong’s riots escalated and the stock market fluctuated, rumors emerged that the anti-communist “financial crocodile” George Soros had taken massive short positions in the stock market. Lai, in turn, echoed these moves by continuing to incite unrest. If social turmoil worsened and the stock market crashed, he would have profited immensely. Fortunately, the situation temporarily eased, and the stock market rebounded. When trading resumed the next day, the Hong Kong stock market continued to rise, causing the “crocodile” to suffer significant losses and forcing a hasty retreat.

Whether this brief financial crisis was related to Jimmy Lai remains an unsolved mystery. However, the “Open Society Foundations” founded by Soros are known to be a driving force behind color revolutions, and he has long been hostile towards China. Thus, it is not impossible that he collaborated with like-minded Jimmy Lai to stir up trouble, taking advantage of the chaos to trigger a financial storm and pursue massive profits.

Although the trial of Jimmy Lai has concluded, many hidden secrets remain unrevealed, potentially involving more individuals and organizations. If the police and media continue to investigate, an even more shocking and larger conspiracy may come to light.




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

One month into war with Iran, an estimated 1,750 Iranians have died—many of them women and children. People with any conscience, including America's allies, hope Trump will stop and spare the people, but he remains characteristically reckless, with ground forces standing ready. One order in a moment of madness could kill far more. 

Pope Leo XIV is deeply appalled by the continued killing and has finally spoken out forcefully: those who initiate wars have blood on their hands and should not justify war in God's name. Though the Pope did not name names, Trump is clearly one of them—he recently gathered Christian leaders at the White House to pray for his 'Christian crusade,' putting Jesus on the war chariot. No wonder the compassionate Pope is outraged.

Pope Leo blasts “war‑makers” with blood on their hands, warning that Jesus will not hear their prayers—an unmistakable rebuke of Trump and Hegseth.

Pope Leo blasts “war‑makers” with blood on their hands, warning that Jesus will not hear their prayers—an unmistakable rebuke of Trump and Hegseth.

More shocking still: Defense Secretary Hegseth was revealed to have made inflammatory remarks at a Pentagon prayer meeting, saying 'we must use overwhelming violence against those who do not deserve mercy.' The brutality is terrifying. The Pope Leo XIV's remarks appear well-aimed, calling the world to recognize the evil face of these so-called Christian zealots.

At the Pentagon, War Secretary Hegseth was exposed urging “overwhelming violence” against those he deems unworthy of mercy—a chilling call to brutality.

At the Pentagon, War Secretary Hegseth was exposed urging “overwhelming violence” against those he deems unworthy of mercy—a chilling call to brutality.

Since the US and Israel began war against Iran, the Pope has spoken out several times calling for a ceasefire and urging those who started the war to lay down their weapons. But this speech was the harshest yet, showing his anger has reached a critical point. 

On Palm Sunday before Easter, he addressed the faithful in St. Peter's Square, saying those who initiate wars have blood on their hands, God will not listen to their prayers, and they should not justify war in God's name.

Trump and Hegseth's Religious War Framing

The Pope's remarks target two recent events. First, shortly after launching the war, Trump assembled conservative evangelical pastors and leaders at the White House. They stood behind him, hands on his shoulders, praying for divine guidance to victory. The scene carried an eerie religious intensity never before witnessed at the White House.

Second, War Secretary Hegseth, author of American Crusade: Our Fight to Stay Free, drew parallels between the conflict with Iran and the Crusades—when Christian armies attacked Islamic nations a thousand years ago. He institutionalized this framing through monthly prayer meetings at the Pentagon, promoting extreme Christian ideology to subordinates.

Pope's Theological Stance Against War

The Pope watched these two troubling phenomena unfold with deep concern and anger. Framing this conflict as a "religious war" doesn't just contradict Christian teaching—it's dangerous, inviting catastrophe. He was unequivocal: "This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war." He then invoked Scripture itself, quoting Jesus: "Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen: Your hands are full of blood."

The Pope directly condemned priests who pray for "war makers," insisting that Christian leaders bearing responsibility for war must repent. His message was clear: supporting a conflict that causes mass suffering is wrong, period—both theologically and morally.

Escalating Conflict and Religious Fanaticism

The Pope had voiced his grave concerns right from the start. Shortly after the conflict erupted, he warned that unchecked escalation would trigger catastrophe, urging all sides to "stop the spiral of violence before it becomes an irreparable abyss." His prescience proved accurate—yet the leaders of both nations, each pursuing their own agenda, have only intensified the flames. They ignore his pleas.

Military leadership has matched political fervor with religious conviction. The War Secretary overseeing operations, Pete Hegseth, has embraced what amounts to religious fanaticism, recently revealed to have sanctified violence during an internal Pentagon prayer meeting. According to the Associated Press, he appealed for ‘overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.’ He was referring to Iran and other Islamic adversaries. To complete this "sacred mission," he suggested, killing is justified.

Call for Unity Against War and Evil

Whether Trump or Hegseth, both rationalize and sanctify mass-killing warfare—a truly terrifying prospect. The Pope’s firm stand today against this "heresy" has greatly heartened those standing on the side of justice.

As long as all anti-war forces unite and continue to grow stronger, we believe we can ultimately overcome evil with righteousness and force the 'warmongers' to back down.

Recommended Articles