Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

US Military Frames Iran Attack as a Modern Crusade

Blog

US Military Frames Iran Attack as a Modern Crusade
Blog

Blog

US Military Frames Iran Attack as a Modern Crusade

2026-03-24 09:05 Last Updated At:09:05

Whether the US war against Iran is nearing its end remains uncertain. Although Trump claims the "military action will gradually de-escalate," on Saturday (March 21)  he issued a final ultimatum: if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened within 48 hours, the US will target power plants and other civilian infrastructure. This signals an escalation of the fighting. More alarming, some US soldiers have received messages framing the war against Iran as a "holy war"—the apocalyptic final battle foretold in the Bible's Book of Revelation.

This rhetoric matches the extreme Christian ideology actively promoted by Secretary of War. CNN's review of his recent statements reveals that he casts the war against Iran as a thousand-year reenactment of the "Crusades." Having this religious zealot leading the conflict makes it especially terrifying.

Hegseth calls himself a “modern Crusader,” branding the Iran war a “holy mission” and preaching religious zeal in monthly Pentagon prayer meetings.

Hegseth calls himself a “modern Crusader,” branding the Iran war a “holy mission” and preaching religious zeal in monthly Pentagon prayer meetings.

According to CNN, the watchdog group Military Religious Freedom Foundation revealed that since the war began, some soldiers received orders from superiors describing the conflict as part of the "end-time final battle" predicted in the Book of Revelation. Other messages reportedly claim the outbreak of war with Iran is meant to usher in Christ’s second coming.

The foundation did not name who issued these messages nor confirm any direct link to Hegseth. However, CNN noted that in recent interviews, he repeatedly referred to “God’s guidance” and the “Christian mission,” framing the conflict in religious terms. He described Iran as a “mad regime obsessed with Islamic fantasy” and portrayed the war's purpose as a righteous battle to purge evil — steeped in religious fanaticism.

Earlier in an interview with CBS, he stated Iran should not doubt an American victory because the US is backed by a supreme power—an "Almighty God" protecting troops as they carry out their holy mission.

Later, while receiving the bodies of fallen soldiers, he said, “The Lord holds my hand in this war and teaches my fingers how to command the battle,” calling it a fight “for faith” and a war of “good over evil.”

Secretary of War's Fanatical Crusade

Not only does he harbor this intense religious fanaticism himself, but he actively promotes “brainwashing” rituals within the War Department, holding monthly prayers designed to embed his extreme beliefs. This has shaped a cadre of “faith warriors” with even deeper religious conviction. Moreover, he invited far-right conservative pastor Doug Wilson—a notorious Christian nationalist—to preach to War Department  personnel, turning Wilson into a kind of ideological mentor inside the military.

Before even becoming Defense Secretary  (later renamed War Secretary), Hegseth had already earned a reputation as a religious fanatic, sparking heated debate. In 2020, he published American Crusade, openly calling himself a “modern-day crusader” and arguing that the U.S. must revive the Crusades era from a thousand years ago. He proposed launching a “holy war” not only against Islamic forces but also against domestic and foreign leftists as well as “communist China.” He specifically insisted Islamic countries must be denied nuclear weapons (targeting Iran), and if necessary, bombed to prevent any challenge to Christianity.

He went so far as to tattoo the Crusader emblem on his body, bearing the Latin phrase Deus Vult, meaning “God’s will.” He explained the tattoo represented the “battle cry of Christian knights marching on Jerusalem,” and insisted Americans must fight today with the same zeal as those Christian brothers a millennium ago.

Looking back, starting in 1095, the Papacy rallied Western European nations to form Crusader armies, repeatedly launching brutal campaigns against Islamic empires to reclaim the Christian “holy city” of Jerusalem. These battles were ruthless, with Crusaders slaughtering tens of thousands of Muslim civilians after capturing cities. Ultimately, the Islamic empires repelled the Crusaders, ending this violent chapter of history.

The Crusades a thousand years ago were marked by mass slaughter of Muslim civilians wherever they went—an extremely terrifying chapter in history.

The Crusades a thousand years ago were marked by mass slaughter of Muslim civilians wherever they went—an extremely terrifying chapter in history.

Historical Crusades and Modern Echoes

When Trump took office, he tapped Hegseth as Defense Secretary. Many already feared he would inject extreme religious ideology into the Pentagon — and since that suited Trump perfectly, Hegseth sailed through. Now he leads the charge in this 'holy war' against Iran, fulfilling his long-held dream of reenacting the Crusades.

Some American scholars told Al Jazeera that framing this conflict as a 'holy war' carries serious risks. If Trump and Hegseth raise the banner of religious belief with the goal of eradicating evil, the consequences become harder to contain — and compromise nearly impossible to reach.

Current Risks of Holy War Framing

Pope Leo XIV has voiced deep concern over this development. Recently, a group of American Christian leaders gathered at the White House to pray for Trump’s attack on Iraq, which unsettled the Pope. Without naming names, he suggested that “Christian leaders responsible for the war should go repent.”

Rational voices should heed the Pope’s warning. But by now, Trump and Hegseth are consumed by fanaticism and deaf to reason.

Lai Ting-yiu




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Americans are asking a blunt question about Trump's war on Iran: why?

On March 19, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified before Congress that Iran has not rebuilt its nuclear capabilities — meaning it poses no imminent threat to the United States. Her testimony cuts directly against Trump's stated justification for the war, deepening public suspicion that this campaign is without legitimate grounds.

Into that vacuum of credibility stepped Joe Kent — Trump's just-resigned director of the National Counterterrorism Center — with a bombshell: senior Israeli officials and pro-Israel media outlets, he charged, were the architects behind America's attack on Iran. Israel masterminded this war. The United States just got dragged along. Barely had Kent exposed the scheme when the FBI moved swiftly, opening an investigation into whether he leaked classified information. But public anger is already lit — and not even Trump's iron fist may be able to stamp it out.

Trump's own man just turned: resigned counterterrorism chief Joe Kent says Israel's top officials pushed America into war with Iran — and are the real force behind it.

Trump's own man just turned: resigned counterterrorism chief Joe Kent says Israel's top officials pushed America into war with Iran — and are the real force behind it.

Kent is no accidental rebel. Trump personally nominated him last year to lead the National Counterterrorism Center, placing him under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and making him the president's chief counterterrorism adviser — a trusted warrior in the MAGA orbit. But not long after the "War of Fury" broke out, Kent walked away in protest. His resignation statement was unambiguous: "I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation."

The more startling charge came right after. Kent alleged the war was "started due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby." The driving force, he said, came straight from the top of the Israeli government — and specifically from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself.

The day after resigning, Kent sat down with Tucker Carlson and kept the revelations flowing. Carlson was once a dedicated Trump loyalist himself, but has recently broken with the president — coming out hard against the Iran war — making both men natural allies in opposition. On air, Kent accused Israel of deceiving Trump into believing America faced a grave threat from Tehran. This is a big lie, Kent said. Israel used the same trick to drag America into the Iraq War, costing thousands of American lives. We must not repeat this mistake.

When Loyalists Flip: The Reckoning

Kent is not fighting alone. Carlson echoed his allegations point-blank, identifying Israel as the force that pressed Washington toward military action against Iran and applied direct pressure on Trump to order the strikes. And from the world of media, Joe Rogan — the MAGA influencer commanding 20 million YouTube subscribers — has arrived at a similar verdict. Rogan called it "a crazy war" and said no one has yet offered a coherent explanation for why it is being fought.

These were once Trump's most loyal supporters. Now they have turned on him — and Trump has responded the only way he knows how: with force. According to the Associated Press, the FBI suspects Kent of leaking classified information and has opened a formal probe. The playbook is familiar — invoke legal process to discredit and silence a dissenting voice, dressing up political retaliation as the pursuit of justice.

Carlson — the other "traitor" in Trump's eyes — disclosed on X that the CIA had submitted a report to the Department of Justice accusing him of operating as an "unregistered agent of Iran." If the charges hold, he faces serious prison time.

Kent's disclosures about Netanyahu's grip on Washington have not gone unnoticed beyond America's borders. Chinese Mainland commentator Chairman Tu has also identified this "hidden hand" — publishing a recent essay laying out what he calls Trump's "Ten Major Political Misjudgments" behind the war. One point landed with particular force: Trump "underestimated Israel's ambitions while overestimating America's control over it."

Kent named Netanyahu as the architect — the man who deceived Trump and used America to fight Israel's war.

Kent named Netanyahu as the architect — the man who deceived Trump and used America to fight Israel's war.

Tu argued that Trump failed to grasp how aggressively Israel would seek to escalate and widen the conflict. At the same time, Trump seriously overrated his own ability to keep Israel in check. Israeli provocations drew Iranian retaliation, which in turn forced Washington into a cycle of military follow-up — leaving the Trump administration entirely reactive, at the mercy of events it no longer controls.

Israel Leads, America Follows

That analysis hits squarely on target. Because Israel has effectively taken the steering wheel of this war, Trump and his team have been along for the ride — unable to see the exit, unable to name the endgame. They push forward simply because they no longer know how to stop.

The reality is that more and more Americans are waking up to Israel's hidden hand in all of this. Many are resolute — they will not let their country be pulled into yet another catastrophe of someone else's making. When Trump finally sees that he stands isolated, that even his most devoted supporters have walked away, perhaps he will step back from the edge in time and choose to cut his losses before it is too late.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles