Important question: what do you call people who try to bomb innocent civilians?
This is an amazing story.
I'll give you the facts – you decide on the answer.
A group of individuals, extremely well-financed by persons unknown, committed horrendous crimes – running bomb factories, gathering explosives for terrorist grade mass casualty attacks designed to kill Hong Kong people in Mongkok and Wan Chai, and plotting to kill "popo", slang for murdering police officers.
This is not in question. Most quickly admitted the crimes, and asked for bail, promising not to flee. Hong Kong has an unusually lenient legal system, so they were duly released. This was in the late summer of 2020.
But here's what happened next. Mysterious persons paid a fortune to people-smugglers to help them jump bail, and they got on a boat to go to Taiwan, a Chinese island province.
When they were rearrested, in the last week of August, the media had to think of a label for them.
Now we all know that if people planning terrorist-grade mass casualty attacks on innocent people had my color skin, looking something like this, they would be called terrorists, wannabe cop-killers, bombers and so on.
But here's the key fact. They weren't dark-skinned. Moreover, they were anti-China people associated with Hong Kong anti-China groups financed by the United States.
So here's how they were actually labelled.
The New York Times called them "activists".
The Washington Post called them "protesters"
The BBC called them "democracy activists".
The Wall St journal called them "Hong Kong residents" as if it's perfectly normal for residents of this city to blow it up!
The Hong Kong Free Press said they were "Hongkongers trying to flee".
Reuters said they were "young men".
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo indicated they were heroes. They "deserved a hero's welcome". He added: "America stands with them."
So there we have it – people who literally tried to blow up innocent Hong Kong people with bombs in a mass casualty event are presented to the world as activists and "hong kong residents" and even "heroes".
Now coming up to date, a related trial has opened, in which gang leaders have fully admitted their plan to create a mass casualty event in my home city – a dramatic plot to kill large numbers of innocent Hong Kong people. It was foiled by police, literally hours before it was due to take place.
Guess what?
The western mainstream media outlets have chosen not to cover the trial. So no one around the world is hearing about it.
Why not? Let's be honest here.
Most mainstream journalists covering Hong Kong and mainland China have abandoned journalism. They have become propagandists with an agenda to demonize China to justify a planned American war, and the trial doesn't fit that narrative.
But you know what? Journalism is too important to let these people kill it.
The truth is important. A lie is still a lie even if the whole world believes it, and the truth is still the truth if even just one person believes it.
So you and I have to step in and do that job. We are the media now.
by Nury Vittachi
Lai See(利是)
** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **
When you play with fire, you’re bound to get burned. After years of stirring up trouble, Jimmy Lai has finally reached the moment of reckoning. Following a 156-day trial that examined 2,200 pieces of evidence and over 80,000 pages of documents, the judge sentenced him to 20 years in prison today. “The evidence is conclusive, and the punishment fits the crime”, as people say. However, this is not the end of the story. Chief Superintendent Li Guilua of the Police National Security Department noted that while the trial phase has concluded, the investigation is still ongoing.
Jimmy Lai was sentenced on Feb 9, bringing the case to a close, yet two major mysteries remain unresolved. The first is the mysterious source of billions of Hong Kong dollars in foreign “chaos-stirring funds” that flowed into his bank accounts. The identity of this mysterious financial pipeline warrants continued investigation.
As I reviewed the case materials and information from various sources, at least two major mysteries remain unresolved. First, the origin of the HK$1.6 billion in black money funneled into Hong Kong through Jimmy Lai remains unclear. These mysterious funding channels have been pumping money in for a long time, which is highly suspicious.
Second, during the “black violence” period, rumors emerge that Lai allegedly collaborated with “financial crocodile” George Soros to trigger a financial crisis. Soros ultimately retreated; the truth of what happened deserves further investigation.
The trial of Jimmy Lai’s case revealed an immense amount of information, uncovering many secrets unknown to the public, particularly details about his fund flows that were shocking. In January 2024, the police submitted a financial investigation report on Jimmy Lai to the court. It stated that his assistant, Mark Simon, received transfer totaling HK$118 million from his boss between 2013 and 2020, of which approximately HK$93 million was transferred in multiple batches to various opposition figures and political parties.
This is only the visible part of the funding; the actual amount might be larger. Next Digital was not a highly profitable company at the time, yet it continued to heavily fund opposition groups and those creating chaos in Hong Kong, clearly indicating a steady source of funds behind it.
The Police’s financial investigation found that Jimmy Lai held two personal bank accounts in Hong Kong and jointly controlled nine company accounts registered or operating in Hong Kong with Mark Simon. These accounts collectively received deposits of HK$2.945 billion, nearly 60% (over HK$1.6 billion) of which originated from the United States, Canada, and Taiwan.
Thus, it’s evident that during that period, there was a continuous inflow of funds from various sources into his multiple accounts. What organizations or individuals provided this money remains an unresolved mystery.
Beyond funding pan-democratic parties and politicians, he also financed related actions during Hong Kong’s unrest. For example, during the 2019 anti-extradition bill riots, he specially donated an additional HK$15 million to the organizers.
Moreover, between 2019 and 2020, he lent HK$500 million to Next Media through shareholder loans, allowing Apple Daily to continue its “inciting” functions. These funds were also transferred from his accounts, similarly, originating from mysterious overseas sources.
Lai employed various methods to convert “foreign financial aid” into “chaos-stirring funds in Hong Kong.” A friend knowing him well told me that in 2019, he allocated some Next Media shares to an American fund, obtaining a sum of money believed to be used for political purposes.
Additionally, with the backing of Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, he purchased large plots of land in Taipei’s Neihu District at low prices. Starting in 2013, he gradually sold these lands and properties at higher prices, making substantial profits that supported Apple Daily in Hong Kong and Taiwan and continued to fund Hong Kong ‘s opposition. During those years, he maintained close ties with Tsai Ing-wen, frequently holding secret meetings to discuss strategies for Hong Kong and introducing American military and political figures to her. The DPP also knew that the more chaotic Hong Kong was, the more beneficial it would be for “pro-independence” elements, and thus provided support in various ways, including economic benefits.
Lai maintained close ties with Taiwan’s Tsai Ing-wen. Since the Hong Kong unrest benefited pro-independence factions, it is plausible that benefits, including profits from real estate, were provided to Lai to turn them into “chaos-stirring funds”.
Even more peculiar is that a year before the “Occupy Central” movement, with the help of former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Lai met with high-level officials in Myanmar’s military and government to prepare for real estate investments. After establishing this “financial pipeline”, he stood to make significant profits. This was an indirect way for American political figures to help him open funding channels.
As for the second mystery, it is equally bizarre. In August 2019, as Hong Kong’s riots escalated and the stock market fluctuated, rumors emerged that the anti-communist “financial crocodile” George Soros had taken massive short positions in the stock market. Lai, in turn, echoed these moves by continuing to incite unrest. If social turmoil worsened and the stock market crashed, he would have profited immensely. Fortunately, the situation temporarily eased, and the stock market rebounded. When trading resumed the next day, the Hong Kong stock market continued to rise, causing the “crocodile” to suffer significant losses and forcing a hasty retreat.
Whether this brief financial crisis was related to Jimmy Lai remains an unsolved mystery. However, the “Open Society Foundations” founded by Soros are known to be a driving force behind color revolutions, and he has long been hostile towards China. Thus, it is not impossible that he collaborated with like-minded Jimmy Lai to stir up trouble, taking advantage of the chaos to trigger a financial storm and pursue massive profits.
Although the trial of Jimmy Lai has concluded, many hidden secrets remain unrevealed, potentially involving more individuals and organizations. If the police and media continue to investigate, an even more shocking and larger conspiracy may come to light.
