Dr. Celeste Lo (Solicitor (Hong Kong), Greater Bay Area Lawyer (PRC), Postdoc Fellow at the School of Law of City University of Hong Kong)
With the release of its latest White Paper, Hong Kong: Safeguarding China’s National Security Under the Framework of One Country, Two Systems, China’s State Council has delineated a comprehensive blueprint for the metropolis’s future. Issued in February 2026, the document provides a granular retrospective on the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law and the recently enacted national security laws. Far exceeding a mere policy review, the White Paper serves as a definitive pronouncement on the recalibrated constitutional nexus between the Central Authorities and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, firmly establishing national security as the indispensable bedrock of Hong Kong’s enduring prosperity.
The central thesis of the White Paper is unambiguous: security and development are not competing interests, but symbiotic imperatives. The document contextualizes the severe turbulence of 2019 not merely as a localized political dispute, but as an existential vulnerability that challenged the sovereign integrity of the state. From Beijing’s perspective, the ensuing legislative interventions were constitutional necessities, urgently required to seal long-standing statutory loopholes. By restoring social equilibrium and erecting a formidable security architecture, the White Paper contends that the central government has successfully safeguarded the “One Country, Two Systems” framework, insulating it against external subversion and internal destabilization.
A substantial portion of the White Paper is devoted to elucidating the institutional refinement of Hong Kong’s governance apparatus. At the heart of this transformation is the fundamental principle of “patriots administering Hong Kong.” The White Paper details how the reformed electoral framework ensures that the city’s executive and legislative branches remain harmonized to align with the broader national interests. This alignment is championed as a vital corrective to overcome historical political deadlocks, thereby cultivating an efficient, executive-led administration uniquely equipped to resolve entrenched socioeconomic challenges. According to the White Paper, this high-caliber, orderly governance paradigm supersedes partisan gridlock with constructive policy formulation, ultimately advancing the tangible wellbeing of the city’s 7.5 million residents.
Equally salient is the White Paper’s sophisticated overture to global capital. Recognizing Hong Kong’s irreplaceable role as a conduit between the Chinese mainland and the global economy, the White Paper introduces the nuanced concept of “open security”. The document marshals an array of compelling economic indicators, surging GDP growth, premier global IPO rankings, and a proliferation of family offices, to illustrate that capital flourishes within a secure, predictable ecosystem. The central government reaffirms its steadfast commitment to preserving Hong Kong’s distinct institutional advantages, notably its esteemed common law jurisprudence, its enduring status as a free port, and the unimpeded circulation of international capital and data.
Ultimately, the White Paper cements a resilient paradigm for Hong Kong. It explicitly asserts that the “highest principle” underpinning the “One Country, Two Systems” policy is the absolute safeguarding of national sovereignty, security, and developmental interests. Within this recalibrated architecture, the contours of the “Two Systems” are precisely demarcated and robustly shielded by the overarching strength of the “One Country”. By projecting a vision wherein ironclad legal safeguards precipitate an open, dynamic, and globally integrated business ecosystem, the White Paper charts a confident vision for Hong Kong to navigate an increasingly complex global landscape with renewed stability and vigour.
InsightSpeak
** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **
On October 14, the Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning led its group through the Miyako Strait into the Western Pacific Ocean for far-sea training.
That same day, the Joint Staff Office of Japan's Ministry of Defense released its regular update on PLA ship and aircraft movements. The photos showed more than the carrier and its escorts. A large drone cruised at high altitude, its long, slender wings upturned at the tips. That was the WZ-7.
A Flyby That Says Plenty
The F-15J fighters dispatched by the Japan Air Self-Defense Force tailed it the whole way. From far below, they trained their cameras on it.
Japanese F-15Js shadowed the WZ-7, cameras aimed up.
These photos say plenty on their own. Japan has long relied on close-range visual observation to track PLA ships and aircraft moving in and out of the First Island Chain. The images are usually sharp enough to count the carrier aircraft on deck and read the hull numbers.
Not this time. What the F-15J caught was the WZ-7 as a distant silhouette high in the frame, clear in outline but far away. The camera could reach it only thanks to a telephoto lens and an upward shooting angle. The fighter itself could never climb to that altitude.
Out of Reach
The WZ-7 cruises at around 18,000 meters, can climb to roughly 20,000 meters when it needs to, and flies at more than 750 kilometers per hour, according to public information. That puts it beyond the effective operating range of conventional fighter jets.
Its joined-wing layout, with fore and aft wings staggered and connected, squeezes maximum lift and range out of a limited wingspan. That lets the drone loiter at altitude for more than ten hours. Its job is not to charge into a combat zone and open fire, but to watch from a safe height and record everything moving on the sea and in the air.
The F-15J's problem runs deeper than simply not reaching 20,000 meters. On paper, the fighter's maximum ceiling is close to 19,000 meters, but that figure assumes an empty load, light fuel and ideal weather. A real combat sortie means hauling external fuel tanks and air-to-air missiles. The added weight drags the usable ceiling down.
Up high, the air is thin. Holding speed means keeping the afterburner lit for long stretches, fuel burn multiplies, and the tanks empty fast. Japanese pilots have said in interviews that when tracking the WZ-7, they mostly operate at around 15,000 meters. To get a clear look at the target above, the rear-seat weapons systems officer has to point a camera straight up.
WZ-7 has appeared near the First Island Chain before.
In other words, even if an F-15J claws its way to its maximum altitude, the fuel and time left over are not enough for any kind of response. It has no margin to intercept and no margin to escort and drive the drone off. All it can do is snap a photo from afar and leave it at that.
Those photos are showing up in Japan's Ministry of Defense reports more and more often. They have almost become a fixed image.
Running on Empty
Tokyo knows the problem well. In recent years, the Air Self-Defense Force has repeatedly rewritten its interception rules, cutting back on emergency scrambles against aircraft of unknown nationality and saving its limited F-15J fleet for the missions that matter most.
The fleet itself is wearing out. Aging airframes, scarce spare parts and rising maintenance hours all stack up, and the number of jets ready to fly keeps shrinking.
Japan is pushing ahead with F-15J modernization, aiming to fit new active electronically scanned array radars and long-range missiles, and it is gradually bringing in the F-35. But re-equipping takes time, upgrade slots are limited, and none of it solves the near-term problem of tracking a high-altitude reconnaissance target.
The WZ-7 is no stranger to the First Island Chain. The Air Self-Defense Force has spotted it over the East China Sea and around the Miyako Strait several times before, but Japanese notices back then usually said only "presumed to be a Chinese unmanned aircraft" without confirming the model.
That changed on September 27 this year, when the Southern Theater Command organized a joint sea-and-air exercise around Scarborough Shoal. A CCTV Military report explicitly said the WZ-7 and the KJ-500 took part. It was the first time official media confirmed the drone had joined a theater-level joint exercise.
From the South China Sea to the East China Sea, this aircraft is becoming a routine sight.
A System, Not a Plane
The same thinking shows up across the rest of the fleet. The KJ-500 pulls sea and air targets into a single situational picture, then pushes it out over data links to ships, aircraft, and shore-based command posts.
The division of labor is clear. Unmanned reconnaissance aircraft see far and see long, airborne early warning aircraft gather and distribute the information, and surface vessels handle the response. This chain runs smoothly only because of years spent building communications and data links. Take one platform out of the system, and even the most advanced hardware accomplishes little on its own.
Japan photographed the WZ-7 shows the drone has entered the category of things that must be tracked and recorded.
Seen this way, the scene over the Miyako Strait was less a victory for any single piece of equipment than a shift in how reconnaissance gets done. In the past, Japan used its geographic edge and a dense network of bases along the First Island Chain corridors to watch PLA movements in and out at close range, continuously, and with a fairly clear picture.
Now the PLA has pushed its reconnaissance platforms to high altitude and distant seas. Observation no longer comes from just one direction, and the two sides' situational awareness is moving toward parity. The very fact that Japan photographed the WZ-7 shows the drone has entered the category of things that must be recorded and answered.
One detail is easy to miss. The WZ-7's airframe carries low-observable coatings, and it is smaller than a manned fighter, so its radar cross-section is modest. That compresses the distance at which Japanese radars can pick it up and sharply degrades the continuity of tracking.
What the Air Self-Defense Force sees may not be the whole picture, and what its notices release may not be the full story. That kind of incomplete information works against Tokyo when it tries to judge the intensity and rhythm of the other side's reconnaissance.
The New Normal
Looked at this way, a single low-angle photograph can only say so much. But the trend it captures is unmistakable.
The information asymmetry in the First Island Chain passages is being erased, bit by bit. Reaching 20,000 meters is just a technical detail. What really changes the game is the system behind the aircraft, one that links land-based, maritime and aerial reconnaissance and command assets into a single web.
Japan will keep taking pictures, and those pictures will keep getting published. But what they record is no longer what it was twenty years ago.
