Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Trump’s Team in Utter Chaos: Pentagon Purging, Musk Quitting, DOGE May Fall Apart

Blog

Trump’s Team in Utter Chaos: Pentagon Purging, Musk Quitting, DOGE May Fall Apart
Blog

Blog

Trump’s Team in Utter Chaos: Pentagon Purging, Musk Quitting, DOGE May Fall Apart

2025-04-25 19:35 Last Updated At:19:35

Trump’s tariff war strategy is becoming increasingly erratic. According to his past negotiation playbook (as outlined in his book Never Give Up), he would sometimes feign indifference to test if the other side was anxious. Yet, this time, it’s the Chinese side adopting this approach, while Trump himself appears impatient and eager for results—an obvious sign that he feels on the back foot and the situation is unfavorable. As the saying goes, “Before repelling external threats, one must first pacify internal disorder.” His external missteps and instability are directly tied to the chaos within his administration.

The latest “disaster zone” for the Trump administration is the Pentagon, the heart of military operations. The “incompetent” Secretary of Defense, Hegseth, launched a sweeping purge as soon as he took office. His heavy-handed actions triggered internal resistance, with subordinates repeatedly exposing his underhanded tactics and leaking scandals. The latest development is a major shake-up at the top, with four core officials dismissed—including Pentagon spokesperson Ullyot, who declared, “It’s been a month of total chaos at the Pentagon.” More internal strife is expected. Meanwhile, Trump’s favored confidant, Musk, abruptly announced he would be stepping back in May, and the massive layoffs initiated by DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) could collapse at any moment.

Calling Secretary Hegseth “incompetent” is no exaggeration. He lacks combat leadership experience, isn’t a career military officer, and even falls short in business management skills—he’s merely a TV host who makes a living with what he says in front of a camera. Before his parachuting into the Pentagon, widespread resistance had already taken root, with the building rigged with metaphorical landmines waiting for him to step on.

Fully aware he was stepping into the lion’s den, Hegseth nonetheless failed to exercise caution. Not long after taking office, it was revealed he had set up a private Signal group to share information about strikes on the Houthi, leaking key military secrets and sparking a huge uproar. Instead of taking responsibility, he blamed disgruntled Pentagon staff for leaking stories to the media to “sabotage” him. The scandals didn’t stop there—recent reports exposed that he even added his wife, brother, and private lawyer into the Signal group, allowing them access to sensitive military operations.

After the first scandal broke, Hegseth immediately launched an internal “witch hunt.” Recently, a major personnel earthquake hit the upper ranks: four close aides including Dan Caldwell, Senior Advisor, Darin Selnick, Deputy Chief of Staff, Colin Carroll, Chief of Staff to Deputy Defense Secretary, and Pentagon spokesperson John Ullyot, were all fired. This is just the latest wave of purges. Insiders told Reuters that Hegseth’s opponents aren’t limited to the Pentagon’s “core circle” but are spread throughout the Department of Defense.

Trump, the “big boss,” is well aware that the Pentagon is still crawling with “monsters and demons” waiting to oppose him and Hegseth, so the purges will continue relentlessly. He recently told reporters, “He (Hegseth) was put there to get rid of a lot of bad people, and that’s what he’s doing.” Clearly, the Pentagon’s personnel turmoil is just beginning.

This “internal strife” at the Pentagon in fact has always been orchestrated by Trump, with Hegseth merely acting as his enforcer. The target: a group of generals lacking loyalty to Trump and promoting “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) within the military. Soon after taking office, Hegseth replaced Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Brown (the first Black person in the role) with Air Force Lieutenant General Kane, a former CIA operative. He then axed Navy Operations Chief Franchetti and Air Force Deputy Chief Slife, and plans to purge other DEI-supporting officers one by one. A previously leaked “termination list” included several brigadier and major generals.

Under this white terror of mass purges, Pentagon staff are on edge. Dissidents dare not openly defy Hegseth, but constantly look for opportunities to expose his errors or set traps for him, while he dispatches his own “secret police” to root out opposition, throwing the Department of Defense into even greater chaos.

With fires breaking out everywhere inside the government, Trump is busy fighting crises, leading to total disarray, sharply contrasting with China’s calm and methodical approach. It’s obvious which side has the upper hand in the US-China trade war.

Beyond the Pentagon’s turmoil, Musk,Trump’s favored appointee tasked with slashing government spending, suddenly announced yesterday that starting in May, he would drastically reduce his involvement with DOGE, possibly working just one or two days a week. His abrupt decision to step back is not only due to Tesla’s latest quarterly net income plunging 70% year-on-year, putting the company in crisis and requiring his full attention as CEO; it’s also because helping Trump with “dirty work” has made Tesla a target for public anger. If Musk doesn’t pull out, his business could collapse sooner or later.

Musk’s departure is now inevitable. Analysts suggest that after he steps back, the cabinet will take over decisions on layoffs, ending Musk’s sole authority. Cabinet members have long been dissatisfied with Musk’s arbitrary cuts, and tensions have grown. For example, Secretary of State Rubio opposes abolishing the USAID (United States Agency for International Development), and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is against massive layoffs of air traffic controllers. Once Musk leaves, these cabinet members may halt or even reverse some of the layoffs.

It’s foreseeable that the once glamorous “DOGE” will likely fall apart with Musk’s exit, and the entire noisy spectacle may soon end in an unfinished mess.

Lai Ting Yiu




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

2026 marks a turning point. As Churchill famously declared during World War II's closing stages, we're witnessing "the beginning of the end." That great catastrophe moved toward its conclusion—and so too is Hong Kong's period of turbulence.

The evidence speaks for itself: Jimmy Lai, already convicted, faces sentencing next year (2026). The "35+ subversion case" will see several major pan-democratic figures released by mid-year, likely retreating from public life for good. And Joshua Wong's trial looms on the horizon, expected around mid-year, bringing another chapter to a close.

Lai's guilty verdict is in. Sentencing starts January 12. Everyone awaits the verdict.

Lai's guilty verdict is in. Sentencing starts January 12. Everyone awaits the verdict.

The era these figures represented is ending—and that's precisely when Hong Kong's steady progress in stability truly begins.

Lai's Sentence: The Clock Is Ticking

The court has already found Jimmy Lai guilty of "colluding with foreign forces." Mitigation begins January 12, with sentencing to follow. The Hong Kong National Security Law leaves no room for ambiguity: serious offenses carry a minimum 10-year term, with life imprisonment as the ceiling. The weight of his punishment will become clear when the judge delivers the verdict.

Consider the precedent: Benny Tai Yiu-ting, the "35+ subversion case" ringleader, faced a 15-year sentencing starting point under the same National Security Law. His guilty plea from the outset reduced his term to 10 years. Lai differs in one crucial respect—he never pleaded guilty. The math isn't complicated.

Public attention now shifts to the eight defendants who pleaded guilty in Lai's case. This group includes former Apple Daily senior executives Cheung Kim-hung, Chan Pui-man, Lo Wai-kwong, Fung Wai-kong, Lam Man-chung, and Yeung Ching-kei, along with "Stand With Hong Kong" members Andy Chan Tsz-wah and Li Yu-hin. A guilty plea typically brings reduced sentences. But five of them—Cheung, Chan Pui-man, Yeung, Andy Chan, and Li—went further, serving as accomplice witnesses whose testimony helped secure Lai's conviction. Their cooperation means significantly lighter sentences and much shorter time behind bars.

Exits and Early Releases

The "35+ subversion case" offers instructive parallels. Au Nok-hin, a key primary election coordinator, initially faced at least 12 years. His guilty plea, demonstrated remorse, and agreement to testify for the prosecution cut his sentence to 6 years and 9 months. Counting from his arrest and remand, he's already served 5 years—release isn't far off.

Another defendant, Andrew Chiu Ka-yin, originally received 7 years. Good prison conduct and genuine remorse earned him leniency—he walked free two months ago.

These two cases set the pattern. If Cheung Kim-hung and the other accomplice witnesses receive substantial reductions, their release may be imminent. All have reportedly calmed down and focused on self-discipline during custody. Once free, they're expected to return to normal lives, avoiding any entanglement with political controversies.

Returning to the "35+ subversion case": eight convicted defendants currently serving sentences will be eligible for release next year. The list includes two major Democratic Party figures—Wu Chi-wai and Andrew Wan Siu-kin—plus former Civic Party leader Alvin Yeung Ngok-kiu. Wu and Wan are due for release in June and July respectively. Friends who've visited them report both are in good health and spirits. Their plans? Emigrate with their families, withdraw from public life, and sever all ties with politics.

As for Alvin Yeung, he pleaded guilty at the first opportunity after arrest and even volunteered to become an accomplice witness—though that offer wasn't accepted. This demonstrates clear regret for his actions. After release, he's expected to return to a proper life path, bidding farewell to his radical years.

Joshua Wong's turn. Collusion charges plus money laundering—another national security spectacle begins.

Joshua Wong's turn. Collusion charges plus money laundering—another national security spectacle begins.

Wong's Turn in the Spotlight

As one chapter closes, another major national security case is about to open. Joshua Wong faces charges of "colluding with foreign forces." His case will be mentioned in court again next year before being committed to the High Court for trial. Wong was already serving a sentence for other offenses when, on June 6 this year, he was arrested in prison and charged with "colluding with foreign forces"—along with a separate count of "money laundering." Like Lai's case, this one involves extensive evidence of intricate connections with foreign governments and politicians, including both public materials and confidential documents. It will draw major attention.

In the past, Wong was lauded by prominent US political figures like Democratic Party leader Nancy Pelosi and became a "darling" of Western media—even appearing on Time magazine's cover. Once trial begins, he'll likely become, like Jimmy Lai, a focal point of attention for Western countries. No doubt another round of commotion will follow.

That said, whatever foreign countries may do, Joshua Wong's case outcome can only be decided by Hong Kong's courts. What final fate awaits this figure? Everyone can grab their popcorn and watch.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles