Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Musk and Tommy Robinson Are Playing with Fire – And Hong Kong BNOs Will Get Burned

Blog

Musk and Tommy Robinson Are Playing with Fire – And Hong Kong BNOs Will Get Burned
Blog

Blog

Musk and Tommy Robinson Are Playing with Fire – And Hong Kong BNOs Will Get Burned

2025-09-15 18:06 Last Updated At:18:06

Elon Musk has been licking his wounds ever since Trump threw him under the bus in American politics. But rather than retreat, he's doubled down on his political addiction – this time crossing the Atlantic to stoke Britain's anti-immigration fires. His partnership with notorious far-right leader Tommy Robinson proved devastatingly effective last Saturday, when they mobilized a staggering 110,000-person demonstration in London.

Tommy Robinson and Musk's toxic partnership just weaponized a dead American influencer to fuel Britain's biggest anti-immigration march in years. This won't end here.

Tommy Robinson and Musk's toxic partnership just weaponized a dead American influencer to fuel Britain's biggest anti-immigration march in years. This won't end here.

These two have been playing transatlantic tag-team politics since Britain's anti-immigration riots last August, but their latest collaboration hit different. They shamelessly capitalized on the recent assassination of American conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, turning his death into rocket fuel for their cause. The result? British anti-immigration sentiment has reached fever pitch, and Hong Kong migrants – who far-right extremists see as just another group of "foreigners" – are about to find out they're not as safe as they thought.

The London march drew more bodies than anyone expected, creating a genuinely terrifying spectacle that shows just how fast far-right populist forces are spreading. Sure, the massive influx of refugees into Britain provided the spark, but three factors turned this into a perfect storm of extremism: Tommy Robinson's recent prison release gave him martyr status and supercharged his ability to rally the troops; Musk personally backing the cause while using X as his megaphone; and the recent shooting of American conservative influencer Kirk, which created a powerful "martyrdom effect" that drove even more right-wing fanatics onto the streets.

When Chaos Becomes Spectacle

Let's talk about Robinson, because he is quite a story. He founded the English Defence League (EDL) and turned inflammatory rhetoric into an art form, building a devoted following among Britain's right-wing crowd. This is someone who regularly spouts radical xenophobic messages and has been hauled before courts for contempt multiple times. Last year, he fled to Cyprus to dodge trouble but kept pumping out racist content online, eventually triggering last August's major riots.

When he returned to Britain last October, he got slapped with an 18-month prison sentence. But here's where it gets interesting – when the High Court heard his appeal in May, they dramatically reduced his sentence and he walked out immediately to a hero's welcome from far-right supporters. He was already promising something "big" back then, and boy did he deliver. Just over three months later, he pulled off this massive 110,000-person march.

Musk's Transatlantic Meddling

Musk and Robinson have been mutual admirers for ages – birds of a feather and all that. When Robinson got locked up, Musk repeatedly posted on X claiming "Tommy is only telling the truth but is being held in solitary confinement" and demanding his immediate release. He essentially picked up Robinson's torch, using X to constantly stoke public anger against refugees during the far-right riots, declaring that "civil war in the UK is inevitable." Prime Minister Keir Starmer was absolutely furious, condemning Musk for openly inciting unrest and warning the government wouldn't stand for it. British police chiefs even threatened to extradite him to Britain for trial.

Musk, safely tucked away in America, obviously couldn't care less about these threats. He ramped up his anti-immigration rhetoric and strengthened ties with far-right parties across Britain and Germany. After Trump's election victory last year, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage personally flew to America to meet the new president and held talks with Musk, praising him as a "hero." Word on the street was that Musk was ready to pump $100 million into the party.

Switching Playgrounds

With Britain’s far-right anti-immigration wave roaring back to life and Musk still smarting from his U.S. setbacks, he spotted the perfect stage for a comeback. So he switched arenas and hitched himself to Robinson.

In a slick video beamed to the marchers, he cooed, “I think there’s something beautiful about being British, and what I see happening here is a destruction of Britain—initially a slow erosion but rapidly increasing erosion of Britain with massive uncontrolled migration.” Then he cranked the volume: “The left is the party of murder and celebrating murder. Violence is coming to you. You either fight back or you die.”

And, for the finale, he demanded “revolutionary government change… everyone must marshal the people, take charge, reform the government, and make sure you actually have a government that is for the people, by the people.”

The crowd went berserk, chanting “Elon! Elon! Elon!”

Here's where things get really dark. Musk and Robinson cynically exploited the shooting death of American right-wing influencer Kirk, holding up his portrait during the march and turning his quotes into rally cries. They basically canonized him as a far-right "martyr." The crowd ate it up, wildly shouting "We are all Charlie" (Kirk's name), proving that their sick martyrdom strategy was working perfectly.

Musk and Robinson clearly have no intention of stopping after this massive show of force. They're actively building what they call a "grand alliance of far-right forces." Representatives from right-wing organizations like Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) showed up at the demonstration. Robinson has already announced plans to create a new organization called "Advance UK" that will directly challenge the Labour government through political interference.

Hong Kong BNOs: You're Not Safe

This anti-immigration fire is only going to burn hotter, and here's the uncomfortable truth that some Hong Kong BNO holders in Britain don't want to face. Friends living in the UK have told me that certain pro-democracy Hong Kong migrants are living in denial, wishfully thinking they don't count as refugees or "illegal immigrants" and therefore won't be targeted by far-right extremists. Some even support their views. But here's reality: to whites caught up in xenophobic hysteria, Hong Kong people are no different from migrants from anywhere else. The message is simple: "this country does not belong to you."

BNO holders thinking they're immune from this anti-immigration backlash? Wake up – you're fooling yourselves.

BNO holders thinking they're immune from this anti-immigration backlash? Wake up – you're fooling yourselves.

So this fire will eventually reach Hong Kong migrants in Britain, and holding a BNO passport won't shield them from the flames.

Lai Ting-yiu




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Think back to Hong Kong's turbulent years. Jimmy Lai had three brothers-in-arms, comrades he bankrolled through thick and thin – Cardinal Joseph Zen, Martin Lee, and Anson Chan. But their bonds weren't just ideological. Money changed hands, and plenty of it. Anson Chan pocketed HK$3.5 million from Lai's war chest. Cardinal Zen took in far more – at least HK$26 million in secret donations that the Hong Kong Diocese never knew about and never investigated. Where did all that cash go? That's the million-dollar question. Or rather, the 26-million-dollar question that remains unanswered.

Cardinal Zen met Pope Leo XIV in Rome, reportedly pushing for Jimmy Lai's release – but Vatican intervention looks unlikely.

Cardinal Zen met Pope Leo XIV in Rome, reportedly pushing for Jimmy Lai's release – but Vatican intervention looks unlikely.

Word broke earlier that Cardinal Zen just made a pilgrimage to the Vatican for a sit-down with the newly minted Pope Leo XIV. The private meeting lasted about an hour. On the agenda: the conviction of "Catholic" Jimmy Lai. Sources say Zen pressed the pontiff hard to "save Lai." What did the Pope say? Nobody's talking. But you can bet the Vatican knows all about the questionable financial ties between Zen and Lai – a relationship the Cardinal has never properly explained to his own Diocese. Did personal interests play a role? The doubts are real.

A Vatican Gambit

Cardinal Zen's "612 Humanitarian Relief Fund" case is still grinding through the courts, and authorities had confiscated his passport. But when the Vatican called its recent "Special Consistory" – bringing cardinals from around the world to Rome – the court granted him temporary travel privileges. During the gathering, Pope Leo XIV carved out time for a private one-on-one with Zen after a breakfast session. The topics? Whether the China-Vatican agreement should be renewed, and the fate of Jimmy Lai, now convicted under Hong Kong's National Security Law. But whether the Pope took any position on Lai remains under wraps.

Zen views Jimmy Lai as both a close friend and a comrade-in-arms, so naturally he's pushing the Vatican to intervene. But here's the Vatican's dilemma: it's not just about China-Vatican relations. It's about the unresolved financial relationship between Zen and Lai – a relationship that has seriously damaged the Cardinal's credibility.

The Secret Pipeline

October 2011 brought a massive leak. Jimmy Lai's secret donations to political parties, politicians, and organizations spilled into public view – and Joseph Zen, then Bishop of Hong Kong, was on that list. Between 2006 and 2010, he received HK$20 million from Lai over four years. From 2012 to 2014, another HK$6 million landed in his hands. The total: a staggering HK$26 million.

When the news broke, Zen went silent. Only after relentless media pressure did he offer an explanation, claiming the money went to support underground churches in the Chinese Mainland and other charitable organizations. With a casual smile, he described himself as a "spendthrift," saying most of the money had already been spent with only a few hundred thousand remaining – and even expressed hope that Lai would keep the donations coming.

Talk is cheap. He provided no concrete evidence to back up his claims. The Hong Kong Diocese knew nothing about his receipt of this massive sum from Lai – the entire "money pipeline" operated in secret. To this day, he has never given the Diocese a complete accounting.

Because this financial channel remained so deeply hidden, suspicions naturally arose that personal interests were involved. But given Cardinal Zen's position, the Diocese refrained from investigating him. The true destination of the funds? Still shrouded in doubt.

HK$26 million from Jimmy Lai to Cardinal Zen – Diocese in the dark, money's whereabouts still a mystery. The trio behind Hong Kong's unrest!

HK$26 million from Jimmy Lai to Cardinal Zen – Diocese in the dark, money's whereabouts still a mystery. The trio behind Hong Kong's unrest!

Vatican Cold Shoulder

Cardinal Zen's questionable relationship with Jimmy Lai, combined with his overly hawkish stance toward China, put him in the Vatican's bad books after Hong Kong's National Security Law took effect in late June 2020. Around that time, Zen traveled uninvited to the Vatican, demanding a meeting with then-Pope Francis to discuss Hong Kong's bishop selection and issues facing underground churches in the Mainland. The Pope gave him zero face. Francis refused to see him. After cooling his heels in Rome for four days with nothing to show for it, Zen returned to Hong Kong empty-handed.

Later, Zen and Lai joined forces on Jimmy Lai's "Live Chat" livestream program to blast the Vatican, accusing it of staying silent on underground churches, Tibet, and Hong Kong human rights issues. This clearly shows how the "Zen-Lai duo" consistently conspired to incite underground church activities in the Mainland, stir up religious conflicts, and undermine China-Vatican relations.

Cardinal Zen's latest Vatican trip for a private papal audience, where he lobbied to "save Lai" and reiterated his opposition to renewing the China-Vatican agreement, proves one thing: at 94 years old, the cardinal's anti-China, pro-chaos heart hasn't changed one bit.

Long Odds

The new Pope's willingness to meet him represents a slight thaw from his predecessor's icy attitude. But the chances of Vatican intervention to "save Lai"? Extremely low. The unresolved questions about Zen's financial relationship with Jimmy Lai have significantly diminished his influence with the Vatican.

From a legal perspective, his cardinal status currently shields him from serious consequences. But risks remain. Perhaps it's time for him to follow Anson Chan's example and retire from such activities while he still can.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles