Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Fat Pang's "Trojan Horse" Hobbled Mr. Tung

Blog

Fat Pang's "Trojan Horse" Hobbled Mr. Tung
Blog

Blog

Fat Pang's "Trojan Horse" Hobbled Mr. Tung

2026-09-10 20:48 Last Updated At:20:48

News broke in the small hours of Wednesday that former Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa had passed away. Many friends in my chat groups shared their condolences. One message read: "Back in the day, he had a grand blueprint for Hong Kong's development. Sadly, the times did not favor him. Britain had planted many landmines, and people on the inside were pulling him back too. His lofty ambitions went unfulfilled. Such a pity." Someone promptly replied: "Mainly because of Anson Chan."

Look back at Mr. Tung's predicament in the early post-handover years, and that verdict holds up. Those dire straits were no accident. The last governor, Chris Patten, nicked name Fat Pang, had long since set a "Trojan horse" trap. The figure hidden inside that horse, bent on tying Mr. Tung's hands, was none other than the then Chief Secretary for Administration, Anson Chan. Fat Pang also went to great lengths to embolden anti-government forces. He conjured up turmoil to drag Mr. Tung back and stymie his governance. That was the seed of even greater unrest in the years to come.

Britain's "Trojan horse" Anson Chan tied Mr. Tung's hands.

Britain's "Trojan horse" Anson Chan tied Mr. Tung's hands.

Landmines Planted Before the Handover

When Mr. Tung was elected the first Chief Executive before the handover, he was brimming with ambition for governing Hong Kong. A friend who knew him well said he hoped to lead the city into a new era. He wanted to overhaul the entrenched mindset of "AO rule," the model of governance dominated by the administrative officer grade. Yet from the very outset, he ran into obstacle after obstacle. All of them were tied to the landmines Britain had planted, above all Fat Pang's "Trojan horse" ploy.

Those landmines were laid even before the Sino-British Joint Declaration was signed. In July 1984, the colonial government published its Green Paper on the further development of representative government in Hong Kong. A year later, it held the first indirect elections to the Legislative Council, all in the name of "returning power to the people." From then on, electoral politics flourished in Hong Kong. It spawned an increasingly powerful opposition that became a counterweight to the government. That was precisely the outcome the British had engineered from the start.

In the final years before the handover, the last governor, Chris Patten, was sent to Hong Kong to raise hell. He promptly started playing dirty. 

Patten devised a system of universal suffrage in all but name and tore up the tracks of the political "through train" meant to carry the legislature across 1997. At the same time, he colluded with the opposition, including Next Media boss Jimmy Lai. Together they whipped up a wave of radicalism and erected barrier after barrier for the future SAR government.

Mr. Tung was, at heart, a businessman. He was untempered by the wiles of politics, and in the early days he did not grasp how treacherous the terrain was. He gave no thought to countering each hostile move as it came, and he failed to rein in the growth of radical politics. All he did was earnestly exhort the opposition not to go astray. Meeting the leading lights of the pro-democracy camp, he urged them to stop holding the June 4 candlelight vigils. 

Tung also spoke pointedly to Martin Lee. He had lived in the United States for many years, he said, and some people there harbored ill intent, so they had to be careful. "Don't be so naive," he told them. But they could not have cared less. It shows that he had long seen the United States was secretly plotting to throw Hong Kong into chaos.

The First Detonation: 2003

Mr. Tung was an upright man. As one friend who knew him put it, he did not know how to fight dirty. He failed to strike hard in time to root out the agents of turmoil. By the middle and later years of his administration, the opposition and the radicals had grown ever stronger, battering his governance time and again. 

When the then Financial Secretary, Antony Leung, downsize the civil service to bring down the fiscal deficit and shield the financial system from predatory speculators, massive street protests promptly erupted. Reform became an uphill battle.

The tide reached its crest over the Article 23 legislation. Demonstrations swelled ever larger, with rioting ready to erupt at a single spark. The pro-establishment Liberal Party, daunted by the situation, declared it would not back the bill. Caught between pressure from within and without, Mr. Tung had no choice but to withdraw it. The episode dealt him a crushing blow. Trace it to its roots, and the source of the calamity lies squarely with the landmines Britain had planted.

The 2003 Article 23 march: Britain's first landmine detonated.

The 2003 Article 23 march: Britain's first landmine detonated.

The Rider Inside the Horse

The other half of Fat Pang's "Trojan horse" ploy was to plant people loyal to him in key posts in the governing team that would straddle the handover. Among them was the government's "No. 2 figure," Chief Secretary for Administration Anson Chan. 

Soon after taking office, Fat Pang began picking his "champions" among the senior ranks. He set his sights on Anson Chan, elbowed aside Chinese officials more senior than her, and hoisted her into the seat of chief secretary, the colonial forerunner of today's chief secretary for administration. He also took care to install Donald Tsang as the first ethnic Chinese Financial Secretary.

The governing team of the early post-handover years was made up entirely of colonial-era AOs. They presided over a bureaucracy dominated by the AO grade. As the undisputed "big sister of the AOs," Chan effectively had the government under her thumb. Mr. Tung became a marshal without generals or soldiers at his command. 

In these circumstances, Chan grew ever more assertive in decision-making, becoming the chief executive officer who held real power. Mr. Tung may have had a bellyful of grand designs, but not long after the handover, he began hitting walls.

Take long-term development planning. Keen to show he could get things done, Mr. Tung proposed setting up a strategic development commission and chairing it himself. But once the proposal landed on Mrs. Chan's desk, it died a silent death, shelved and left to gather dust. Such episodes were commonplace at the time.

Major policy changes were likewise dogged by Mrs. Chan's obstruction. On mother-tongue education in schools, she saw things differently from Mr. Tung. She also clashed repeatedly with Antony Leung, the Executive Council member then in charge of education reform. 

The result: the policy was never fully implemented. What is more, she bristled at the very notion of "one country." She drew a clear line between Hong Kong and the mainland at every turn and repeatedly poured cold water on cross-border cooperation.

On political controversies, too, Mrs. Chan did not stand by Mr. Tung. Take the "Robert Chung affair". Within the government, she pressed hard to have Andrew Lo, the Tung aide embroiled in the affair, shown the door. Worse still, her confidants routinely leaked to friendly media, feeding them stories damaging to Mr. Tung.

Grandpa Finally Stepped In

Such protracted infighting within the government naturally took its toll on Mr. Tung's governance. Faced with this internal crisis, Beijing finally stepped in. When Chan went up to the capital to report on her duties in September 2000, the then Vice Premier Qian Qichen and the then Director of the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, Liao Hui, received her separately. Their message was to support Mr. Tung. In other words, no more infighting.

Beijing's displeasure with Chan could not have been clearer. By early 2001, she knew the game was up. She finally resigned, leaving the government a year ahead of schedule. 

Not long afterwards, Mr. Tung brought in Antony Leung as Financial Secretary. Senior financier Frederick Ma followed close behind, joining the government as Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury. The AO stranglehold on the governing team began to be broken.

Fresh winds may have blown through the government. But the anti-government forces Britain had so painstakingly cultivated before the handover, and the radical tide they rode, were still very much in the ascendant. Battered by the storm of 2003, Mr. Tung finally stepped down in dejection just over a year later.

When Mr. Tung took office as Chief Executive, his heart was set on soaring ambitions. But he fell victim to the last governor Fat Pang's "Trojan horse" ploy. Forces inside and outside the government clung fast to his legs. In the end, his lofty aspirations went unfulfilled. A truly lamentable fate.

Lai Ting-yiu




What Say You?

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney refuses to bow. Today he fired 'tariff missiles' at the United States in retaliation, daring to shake a far bigger power and vowing to fight to the bitter end. Canada has turned itself into North America's 'Iran,' and Trump is vexed on top of vexed.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney fires 'tariff missiles' at the United States in retaliation, with the measures taking effect today. The escalation reflects his determination to fight a make-or-break battle. Trump now faces North America's 'Iran' and is even more vexed.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney fires 'tariff missiles' at the United States in retaliation, with the measures taking effect today. The escalation reflects his determination to fight a make-or-break battle. Trump now faces North America's 'Iran' and is even more vexed.

Carney is willing to risk a last-ditch battle because he knows Trump is no adversary for mutual accommodation. Trump plays by winner-take-all rules and seizes every benefit in sight. If Canada fails to rise up and resist, it will be at his mercy from now on, so this is a fight he cannot avoid.

He also has the confidence to stand firm. Canadians are united against a common enemy, with more than 80 percent backing his retaliation against the United States and willing to endure economic pain. Several US states will take a hit and are expected to pressure the White House.

Make no mistake: Trump now faces two 'Irans' at once, and he has no idea how to bring this to an end.

Carney's counterattack was forced on him.

Last month, negotiations between the two countries could have reached a deal. Then the American side turned aggressive and piled on harsher conditions at the last minute.

Those terms would keep tariffs on Canadian automobiles, heavy trucks, steel and aluminum entering the United States. The aim: move Canada's key manufacturing to America, 'deindustrialize' the country and leave it even more dependent on the US.

Carney naturally saw through Trump's malice. If Canada conceded this step, its economy would gradually be hollowed out. The country would slide further into the role of a US vassal and would have little room to maneuver in the future.

So he resolutely ordered his officials to withdraw from the talks, saying the American demands had gone beyond a reasonable scope, and the negotiations broke down. He slammed the United States for "asking too much" while "offering too little". He called it a maximum-pressure tactic from the American side, one he could never accept.

After the negotiations collapsed, he decided to fire 'tariff missiles' in retaliation. He declared: "You’re at war when you get attacked. We got attacked." The ready-for-war tone closely echoes the rhetoric Iranian leaders aim at the United States.

Canada's series of retaliatory tariffs against the United States took effect today. The measures slap duties of 15 to 50 percent on hundreds of American goods. Tariffs on steel products will rise from 25 percent to 50 percent, while consumer goods such as motorcycles, cosmetics and yogurt will also face tariffs.

The tariffs will deal a certain blow to American manufacturers and exporters. Businesses in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and other states will feel the impact hardest.

Make America Feel The Pain

Mark Carney's tariff missiles have a blunt purpose. As Brian Clow, the former prime minister's senior economic adviser, put it, the retaliatory tariffs against the United States are meant to make American businesses and consumers truly feel the heavy cost of the trade war and force Washington back to the negotiating table.

Call it the "make you feel pain" strategy. The playbook closely mirrors Iran's approach.

But this hardball cuts both ways. Canada's economy will suffer internal damage, and Canadian citizens will feel the pain.

BBC commentary frames the stakes: Carney's decision will test whether Canadians are willing to endure economic pain to back his refusal to concede and wage a trade war against the United States.

To pull it off, he must persuade the public that a better deal is worth the price.

The latest polls tell the story. Anti-American sentiment is running high among most Canadians, and they support Carney's counterattacks.

The Globe and Mail and the polling firm Nanos surveyed 1,037 people. The verdict: 85 percent support Carney's refusal to reach a deal with the United States, 80 percent back his retaliatory tariffs against the US, and about 70 percent are willing to pay higher prices for daily necessities as a result.

Anti-US sentiment runs high in Canada, with more than 80 percent of Canadians backing Carney's retaliatory tariffs against the US. That groundswell gives him the confidence to confront Trump head-on.

Anti-US sentiment runs high in Canada, with more than 80 percent of Canadians backing Carney's retaliatory tariffs against the US. That groundswell gives him the confidence to confront Trump head-on.

Another poll adds weight. It finds 56 percent of Canadians want the government to take a tough stance and make no further concessions to the United States.

This public mood is the backbone of Carney's head-on collision with Trump. But as Iran's current predicament shows, how long the public can endure economic pain is the decisive factor between victory and defeat. That remains to be seen.

The Associated Press notes that whatever happens in Canada-US talks, this bitter fight has left Carney with new ideas for Canada's future development strategy.

The blueprint: double exports to "non-US" regions over the next 10 years, reduce dependence on the United States, repair economic and trade ties with China, and pursue strategic autonomy.

Trump's Trouble Multiplies

And then there is defense. Canada will sharply raise its defense budget and strengthen its domestic arms industry. Only by depending less on the United States for its own protection does it gain the leverage to push back.

Did Iran's example inspire Mark Carney's nerve to fight Trump head-on? Outsiders cannot know. But his strategic thinking does run close to Iran's: economic warfare, too, can be waged with 'asymmetric warfare' tactics.

Precision is the weapon. If he can land accurate strikes on a handful of key U.S. states, a reversal of the situation is not impossible.

For Trump, the trouble keeps multiplying. Iran already refuses to stay down, no matter how hard he hits. Now Canada has become another 'Iran,' just as the congressional midterm elections draw near. That is trouble on top of trouble.

Perhaps Trump would finally learn the lesson. In this world, 'might' is no promise for a sure win.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles