Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

White House Adviser’s “Vampire” Remark Sowing Discord in UK–China Relations

Blog

White House Adviser’s “Vampire” Remark Sowing Discord in UK–China Relations
Blog

Blog

White House Adviser’s “Vampire” Remark Sowing Discord in UK–China Relations

2025-05-06 16:47 Last Updated At:16:47

LONDON - As the United Kingdom and the United States navigate fraught tariff negotiations, a senior White House official has injected a new note of discord into transatlantic relations.

In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Peter Navarro, President Trump’s trade adviser and an architect of the administration’s combative tariff strategy, accused Britain of acting as a “compliant servant” to Beijing in its efforts to attract Chinese investment. He went so far as to liken China to a “vampire,” warning that deepening economic ties with Beijing could leave Britain exposed and vulnerable.

“If the Chinese vampire can’t suck the American blood, it’s going to suck the UK blood and the EU blood,” Navarro said, casting China’s global economic ambitions as a threat to Western prosperity. “This is a very dangerous time for the world economies with respect to exposure to China”

Navarro’s remarks arrive at a delicate moment for British officials, who are seeking to balance closer economic ties with both the European Union and China, even as they court a new trade agreement with Washington. Since Labour’s victory in last July’s general election, the government has promoted what it calls a “balanced” and “pragmatic” approach to China, insisting that isolating Beijing is neither realistic nor in Britain’s interest. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy have both traveled to China in recent months, emphasizing the need for stable, mutually beneficial relations. Reeves has described London as the “natural home” for Chinese capital.

The British government, for its part, responded with a measured statement. “This administration will always approach UK–China relations with clear-eyed vigilance and a coherent strategy,” a spokesperson said, adding that Britain’s trade policy remains focused on long-term prosperity without compromising economic or national security.

Navarro’s comments have not gone unnoticed in the British press. A recent commentary in iNews, headlined “The UK is no ‘servant of China,’ but the US is not the only game in town,” argued that the White House adviser’s broadside signals growing American hostility toward Britain and its European allies. The article noted that Navarro’s rhetoric reflects deep-seated anxieties in Washington about China’s substantial and growing investments in the UK. According to a report by Grant Thornton, by 2023, nearly a thousand British companies were effectively Chinese-owned, supporting more than 59,000 jobs and generating over £116 billion in revenue - a “significant contribution” to the UK economy.

The iNews commentary went further, suggesting that Navarro’s hardline stance, while consistent with the Trump administration’s approach, also reveals American vulnerabilities in the ongoing trade war. The aggressive tariff policies championed by Trump and Navarro have destabilized global trade relations, the article argued, and Navarro may be hoping to pressure Britain into adopting a tougher line on China to secure a favorable US–UK deal - even if such tactics risk backlash at home.

Britain has not escaped the fallout from Washington’s tariff escalation. While facing a baseline US tariff of 10 percent, the UK remains subject to the 25 percent duties imposed by Trump on automobiles and steel and aluminum products. Despite his criticism of London’s China policy, Navarro acknowledged that UK–US trade talks are progressing, with US Vice President Vance recently expressing optimism about a swift agreement.

Meanwhile, the UK and EU are preparing for a summit on May 19, with both sides signaling plans to deepen cooperation on trade and security, including harmonizing food standards and carbon trading. Trump has previously accused the EU of deliberately obstructing US imports.

British officials have repeatedly emphasized that the UK need not choose between the EU and the US, as both are vital partners. Food safety standards remain a sticking point in UK–US trade talks; like the EU, the UK currently bans hormone-treated beef and chlorine-washed chicken. Navarro has warned that if Britain refuses to relax these standards, it will have to bear the costs.

Navarro, a fixture in Trump’s economic team, is known for his hardline views and his belief in tariffs as a primary policy tool. He has advocated for economic decoupling from China and that the world should isolate China. He has held senior roles throughout Trump’s presidency, describing his guiding principle as “wholeheartedly helping President Trump realize his vision,” while always being willing to “take the blame” but never seeking credit.

The Labour government of UK, in contrast, maintains a pragmatic, balanced approach toward China.

Chinese officials have pushed back forcefully. At a public event on May 3, Xie Feng, China’s ambassador to the United States, insisted that economic and trade relations are not a zero-sum game and warned that escalating tariffs would disrupt business, daily life, and global financial stability. “We do not want a tariff war, but we are not afraid of one,” Xie said. “We are determined to defend not only our legitimate rights, but also the international economic and trade order.”




Deep Throat

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Trump wasted not one second after US forces grabbed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. He made it clear that he was eyeing the country's oil riches. But here's the catch: America's biggest oil companies aren't biting. Industry analysts confirm what the companies won't say publicly—even if these firms wanted back in, Venezuela's crumbling infrastructure and chaos on the ground mean Trump's fantasy of quick oil profits is far from easy to come true.

Trump promises Big Oil will pour billions into Venezuela. The oil giants say they never got the memo. AP Photo

Trump promises Big Oil will pour billions into Venezuela. The oil giants say they never got the memo. AP Photo

Minutes after the military operation wrapped, Trump stood at a press conference making promises. Major American oil companies would pour into Venezuela, he declared, investing billions to fix the country's shattered oil infrastructure "and start making money for the country". Meanwhile, he reiterated that the US embargo on all Venezuelan oil remains in full effect.

Those sanctions have crushed Venezuelan exports into paralysis. Documents from Venezuela's state oil company and sources close to the situation confirm storage tanks and floating facilities filled up fast over recent weeks. Multiple oil fields now face forced production cuts.

White House Courts Reluctant Executives

Reuters revealed the Trump administration plans meetings this week with executives from major US oil companies. The agenda: pushing these firms to restore and grow oil production in Venezuela following the military action. The White House sees this as a critical step toward getting American oil giants back into the country to tap the world's largest proven oil reserves.

But Trump's eagerness hasn't translated into corporate enthusiasm. Several major US oil companies are taking a wait-and-see approach, watching Venezuela closely. ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, and Chevron all denied any prior communication with the White House about Venezuela. This directly contradicts Trump's claim over the weekend that he had already met with "all" US oil firms both before and after Maduro's capture.

Venezuela sits on roughly 17% of the world's proven oil reserves—first place globally. Yet US sanctions and other pressures have gutted its production capacity. Current output runs around 1 million barrels daily, barely 0.8% of global crude production.

World's largest oil reserves, strangled by US sanctions. Trump's quick-profit scheme hits a hard reality. AP Photo

World's largest oil reserves, strangled by US sanctions. Trump's quick-profit scheme hits a hard reality. AP Photo

Only One Company Stays Put

Chevron remains the sole major US oil company still operating Venezuelan fields. The firm has worked in Venezuela for over a century, producing heavy crude that feeds refineries along the Gulf Coast and beyond. A company spokesperson said on the 3rd that the current priority centers on "ensuring employee safety, well-being, and asset integrity," adding they "will continue to operate in accordance with laws and regulations."

ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips previously invested in Venezuela. In the 1970s, the Venezuelan government nationalized the oil industry, reopened to foreign investment by century's end, then demanded in 2007 that Western companies developing oil fields form joint ventures with Venezuelan firms under Venezuelan control. ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips pulled out. Neither company has responded to Trump's latest remarks about US capital entering Venezuela.

One oil industry executive told Reuters that companies fear discussing potential Venezuelan business at White House-organized meetings due to antitrust concerns.

Benefits Flow to First Mover

Francisco Monaldi, director of the Latin America Energy Program at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy, expects Chevron would likely benefit first if Venezuela opens oil projects to the US. Other oil companies, he notes, will watch Venezuela's political situation closely and observe the operating environment and contract compliance before making moves.

Mark Christian, business director at an Oklahoma energy consulting firm, lays out the baseline: US companies will only return to Venezuela if they're certain of investment returns and receive at least minimal security guarantees. Lifting sanctions on Venezuela stands as a prerequisite for US companies re-entering that market.

Reality Check on Oil Profits

Even with sanctions lifted, the Trump administration won't find making money from invasion-acquired oil that easy.

 Industry insiders admit large-scale restoration of Venezuelan oil production demands years of time and billions in investment, while confronting major obstacles: dilapidated infrastructure, uncertain political prospects, legal risks, and long-term US policy uncertainty.

Peter McNally, global head of industry analysis at Third Bridge, said, "There are still many questions that need to be answered about the state of the Venezuelan oil industry, but it is clear that it will take tens of billions of dollars to turn that industry around." He then added that it could take at least a decade of Western oil majors committing to the country.

Ed Hirs, an energy expert at the University of Houston, pointed to a pattern: US military invasions of other countries in recent years haven't delivered substantial returns to American companies. The history of Iraq and Libya may repeat itself in Venezuela.

Recommended Articles