Trump's "Big and Beautiful" Gamble: How America Risks Falling Further Behind Asia's Electric Revolution

After more than 24 hours of political theater in the Senate, Trump's so-called "Big and Beautiful" bill finally squeaked through on Tuesday with Vice President JD Vance casting the deciding vote in a nail-biting 50-50 tie. Three Republican senators jumped ship, but it wasn't enough to sink what many are calling a legislative gamble that could backfire spectacularly.

The "Big and Beautiful" bill squeaked through the Senate after JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. AP Photo

The bill's premise sounds simple enough: extend the corporate and individual tax cuts from Trump's first rodeo in office. But to pay for it, they're axing subsidies for wind, solar, and other renewable energy projects. It's a move that has industry analysts scratching their heads and wondering if Washington has completely lost the plot on where the global economy is heading.

While America Debates, Asia Powers Ahead

Here's where things get a bit embarrassing for American policymakers. Bloomberg's number-crunching reveals that since 2000, US electrification has basically been treading water while Asian countries have been racing ahead like they're in some kind of clean energy Olympics.

The math is pretty stark when you look at it. China's electricity share of final energy consumption is pushing 30%, according to research from the Rocky Mountain Institute using International Energy Agency data. Meanwhile, the US and EU are stuck at around 22% – roughly the same place they were two decades ago. That's not exactly the kind of "America First" leadership Trump likes to talk about.

Scrapping renewable subsidies could leave America even further behind Asia's electrification surge.

What makes this even more telling is the economic logic behind it all. Most Asian countries are net importers of fossil fuels, so going electric isn't just good for the planet – it's good for their wallets and energy security. America, sitting pretty as the world's top oil and gas producer, doesn't feel that same pinch. But that short-term thinking might just be setting the US up for a long-term strategic disaster.

Asian countries like Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Indonesia are ramping up their power equipment manufacturing at breakneck speed, driven by surging electricity demand. They're not just talking about energy transition – they're actually doing it, while America seems more interested in political point-scoring than practical progress.

Musk vs. Trump: When Billionaires Collide

Nothing quite captures the chaos of modern American politics like watching two of the country's most prominent figures duke it out on social media over energy policy. Elon Musk, never one to mince words, went absolutely ballistic over the "Big and Beautiful" bill, warning it would be a "massive strategic error" that would "destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country".

Musk's Twitter meltdown over the bill sparked a public spat with Trump. AP File Photo

The Tesla boss didn't stop there – he fired off dozens of tweets and even threatened to start his own political party called the "American Party" if the bill passed. That's when Trump decided to remind everyone who's boss, suggesting he might "take a look" at deporting Musk and telling him not to play this game with him. "If DOGE looks at Musk, we're going to save a fortune," he told reporters.

The whole spat reveals something deeper about America's energy future. Musk's fury isn't just about protecting Tesla's bottom line – though the bill's proposal to scrap tax exemptions for electric vehicle buyers certainly doesn't help his business. It's about watching America potentially sabotage its own chances in the industries that will define the next century.

Debt Mountain Gets Bigger, Blame Game Gets Louder

Here's the bit that should really worry anyone paying attention to America's fiscal future: this bill is going to make the debt crisis significantly worse, not better. We're talking about a country where annual interest payments on federal debt already exceed military spending and are roughly equal to what gets spent on Medicare each year.

The Congressional Budget Office isn't pulling any punches – they're projecting that debt interest payments will increase by an average of $55 billion annually over the next decade, possibly more. Meanwhile, the bill is expected to squeeze the poorest American families by nearly 4% while boosting incomes for the wealthiest by over 2%. That's not exactly the populist economics Trump campaigned on.

But rather than own up to the fiscal math, Trump's doing what he does best – pointing fingers. This time, it's Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell who's getting the heat, with Trump demanding interest rates be slashed to 1% to save "trillions in interest costs." He even sent Powell a handwritten letter spelling out exactly what he wants, which is either charmingly old-school or slightly unhinged, depending on your perspective.

Trump points fingers at Fed Chair Powell as debt crisis deepens.

The reality is that Trump's looking for someone else to clean up the mess his policies are creating. His tariff wars are already squeezing consumers and stoking inflation, and now this bill threatens to pile more debt onto an already groaning system. Blaming the Fed is classic political theater, but it doesn't change the underlying arithmetic.

What we're witnessing isn't just bad policy – it's America potentially sleepwalking into strategic irrelevance while other parts of the world sprint toward the future. The "Big and Beautiful" bill might deliver short-term political wins, but the long-term costs could be anything but beautiful.

Deep Throat

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Trump just rolled out another tariff threat, and this time Iran's trading partners are in his crosshairs. On January 12, the US president announced a blanket 25% tariff on any country "doing business" with Tehran.

The international press immediately fixated on China—Iran's biggest trade partner. Reuters warned this could reignite the US–China trade war and shred the fragile truce both sides hammered out last year. But Chinese scholars aren't buying it. They say Trump lacks the nerve to slap Beijing with new tariffs, because China will hit back hard—and make him regret it.

Anti-government protests erupt in Iran. (AP photo)

The Financial Times reported on January 12 that these tariffs—which took effect immediately—could slam China, India, Turkey, Pakistan, the UAE, Brazil, and Iraq. All of them trade heavily with Iran. Russia sealed a new free trade deal with Iran in 2025, making it another potential target.

CNN pointed out the stakes for Beijing. China trades with both Iran and the US, so if Washington applies these tariffs, Chinese goods entering America could see costs spike. The network recalled that after last year's summit in Busan, South Korea, the Chinese and US presidents agreed to pause portions of their tariff war—a temporary truce.

Iran as Flashpoint, Again

Reuters published a piece on January 13 titled "Trump's Iran Tariff Threat Risks Reopening China Rift." The article traced how Iran became a powder keg in US–China relations during Trump's first term (2017–2021).

Back then, Washington tightened sanctions on Tehran and blacklisted Huawei, accusing the Chinese telecom giant of selling tech to Iran. That led to the arrest of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei's daughter, Meng Wanzhou, in Canada—triggering a diplomatic crisis and sending bilateral tensions through the roof.

Now Trump's targeting Iran again. If he follows through, total US tariffs on Chinese exports could exceed 70%—way higher than the rates both sides agreed to last October when they dialed down their trade fight.

It's still unclear which countries or entities Trump will actually target. He hasn't named China explicitly. But Reuters noted Trump has a track record of making bombastic statements that could upend US foreign policy—only to back off later.

US–China "truce" forged in Busan last year now at risk if Trump's Iran tariffs target Beijing. (AP file photo)

Beijing Calls Trump's Bluff

Wu Xinbo, Dean of Fudan University's School of International Relations, told Reuters that China sees through Trump's posturing. "China will call (Trump's) bluff. I can assure you that Trump has no guts to impose the extra 25% tariffs on China, and if he does, China will retaliate and he will be punished," said Wu.

Another Chinese scholar pushed back on the narrative that China and Iran are economically intertwined, noting that "China and Iran are not as close as in the public imagination".

China Customs data backs that up. Beijing has dramatically reduced imports from Iran in recent years. Through November last year, China imported just 2.9 billion USD worth of Iranian goods—a far cry from the 21 billion USD peak in 2018, during Trump's first presidency.

Some sources claim China's major oil companies stopped doing business with Iran in 2022. Yet China's purchases from Tehran still run into the billions, thanks to independent refiners handling shipments.

China as Convenient Scapegoat

Wang Jin, a researcher at Beijing's Dialogue Think Tank, told reporters that "China is just an excuse, a kind of disguise for the Trump administration, to impose new pressure (on) Iran."

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning responded to Trump's tariff threat on January 13. She stated that China's position on tariffs is crystal clear: tariff wars produce no winners. Beijing will firmly defend its legitimate rights and interests.

Analysts warn that Trump's renewed attempt to cut Iran off from global trade could heighten worries about the Belt and Road Initiative. Iran serves as a strategic hub for Chinese goods heading to the Middle East.

This tariff gambit has cast doubt on Trump's planned April visit to China. Observers had expected him to seal a comprehensive trade deal with Beijing during that trip.

The Wall Street Journal echoed Reuters' concerns, warning that new tariffs on Iran's trading partners could wreck the US–China trade truce.

But Reuters also cited Xu Tianchen, a senior analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit, who questioned whether Trump's tariff policy is even enforceable. "Last year he announced tariffs related to 'illicit' Russian oil trade, but their implementation was patchy." Xu said.

He went on stating that "Trump is also the kind of person who likes bullying the weak," Xu said. "He should manage his actions to avoid these tariffs escalating into direct confrontation with China".