Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Putin's Tactical Gambit: Why Giving a Soviet Medal to a CIA Boss's Son is Peak Political Theatre

Blog

Putin's Tactical Gambit: Why Giving a Soviet Medal to a CIA Boss's Son is Peak Political Theatre
Blog

Blog

Putin's Tactical Gambit: Why Giving a Soviet Medal to a CIA Boss's Son is Peak Political Theatre

2025-08-11 23:31 Last Updated At:23:31

Russian President Vladimir Putin has just pulled off what might be the most audacious diplomatic stunt in recent memory. With Trump breathing down his neck and threatening harsh sanctions, Putin decided to present the Order of Lenin—the Soviet Union's highest honor—to the son of a senior CIA official. The twist? The recipient died fighting for Russia against Ukraine. Talk about timing.

The Medal That Tells a Story

During Putin's August 6th meeting with US Presidential Special Envoy Witkoff, the Russian leader handed over an Order of Lenin medal, requesting it be passed to Juliane Gallina, the CIA's Deputy Director for Digital Innovation. The medal was meant to honor her son, Michael Gloss, who reportedly died in the Russia-Ukraine conflict last year—fighting on the Russian side.

Putin meets Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff on August 6

Putin meets Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff on August 6

The CIA had previously confirmed that Gallina's son died in combat during the Russia-Ukraine conflict, though they were notably vague about which side he was on. Russian media later confirmed that Gloss had joined the Russian army and fought for Moscow. According to CBS News, citing multiple sources, Michael Gloss never worked for the CIA, and there's no indication he was recruited by the Russian government either.

In April, a CIA spokesperson confirmed the death, describing it as an "unimaginable personal tragedy" for Gallina and her family. They emphasized that Gloss, who was "struggling with mental health issues," died in combat during the conflict, calling it "a private family matter, not a national security issue." The agency conspicuously avoided mentioning which side he fought for.

From Red Square to the Front Lines

The story of Michael Gloss reads like something out of a Cold War thriller, except it's painfully real. Russian outlet "Important Stories" reported that Gloss had joined the Russian army, backing this up with his own social media posts. Last year, he posted a photo of himself smiling in Moscow's Red Square, expressing sympathy for Russia's role in what he called the "Ukraine proxy war."

Gloss posted a smiling Red Square photo last year

Gloss posted a smiling Red Square photo last year

Gloss was scathing about Western coverage, claiming news reports about the Russia-Ukraine conflict were all "Western propaganda" that concealed reality. He declared that "the corrupt Ukrainian army is simply no match for the Russian army.“

His family's obituary was tellingly euphemistic, stating Gloss died "while traveling in Eastern Europe" with no mention of the conflict. It added that he lived a "brief, but fiercely beautiful life until he was taken from us during his travels overseas." His father, Larry Gloss—an Iraq War veteran—told The Washington Post that he and Gallina had no idea their son was in Ukraine or that he'd joined the Russian army.

The Making of a Defector

Gloss’s transformation from a privileged American into a Russian soldier appears to have been gradual. He reportedly harbored long-standing dissatisfaction with the American system and left the U.S. by early 2023 to travel. On his personal homepage, he indicated that he was “running away from home” to see the world.

Gloss had long been disillusioned with the U.S. system

Gloss had long been disillusioned with the U.S. system

Friends later said he seemed to believe there were more interesting places to experience than the United States. They also described him as acutely aware of his own privilege and deeply critical of America’s political and social order. In 2022, he is said to have posted a video burning an American flag; when asked online about his nationality, he reportedly responded that he was American but expressed regret about it.

One acquaintance who hosted him briefly in Turkey recalled that he often talked about poverty and the possibility of civilizational decline. According to this account, he was convinced Western hegemony was fading and that the BRICS countries could soon supplant it. This person also said Gloss consumed a lot of content about Palestine, was intensely angry with the United States, and had started considering a move to Russia, even contemplating taking up arms against America.  

Putin's Master Class in Political Mischief

The Order of Lenin isn't just any medal—it was the Soviet Union's highest state decoration, established in 1930 and awarded to individuals who made exceptional achievements. Famous recipients included Harold "Kim" Philby, one of the notorious "Cambridge Five" spies. Crucially, Russia stopped awarding this decoration after the Soviet collapse, making Putin's decision to resurrect it particularly loaded with symbolism.

The timing is everything. Trump just announced he'll meet Putin in Alaska on August 15th to discuss long-term peaceful solutions to the Ukraine crisis. Putin's medal gambit serves multiple purposes: it highlights the uncomfortable fact that a senior CIA official's son fought and died for Russia, it embarrasses US officials at a sensitive diplomatic moment, and it carries a distinctly mocking flavor toward Western politicians.

This isn't just satire—it's Putin operating at peak trolling capacity. While Trump grows increasingly frustrated with the Kremlin and threatens harsh sanctions, Putin is essentially saying: "Your own people are fighting for us." The move reflects how desperate Trump is for a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire, and Putin is gleefully taking advantage to "play games."

Currently, the White House, CIA, and Russian officials haven't responded to the Lenin Order incident, and the medal's fate remains unclear. But the message has already been delivered loud and clear—in the grand chess game of international relations, Putin just played a move that's equal parts brilliant and brutally embarrassing for Washington.




Deep Throat

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Trump just rolled out another tariff threat, and this time Iran's trading partners are in his crosshairs. On January 12, the US president announced a blanket 25% tariff on any country "doing business" with Tehran.

The international press immediately fixated on China—Iran's biggest trade partner. Reuters warned this could reignite the US–China trade war and shred the fragile truce both sides hammered out last year. But Chinese scholars aren't buying it. They say Trump lacks the nerve to slap Beijing with new tariffs, because China will hit back hard—and make him regret it.

Anti-government protests erupt in Iran. (AP photo)

Anti-government protests erupt in Iran. (AP photo)

The Financial Times reported on January 12 that these tariffs—which took effect immediately—could slam China, India, Turkey, Pakistan, the UAE, Brazil, and Iraq. All of them trade heavily with Iran. Russia sealed a new free trade deal with Iran in 2025, making it another potential target.

CNN pointed out the stakes for Beijing. China trades with both Iran and the US, so if Washington applies these tariffs, Chinese goods entering America could see costs spike. The network recalled that after last year's summit in Busan, South Korea, the Chinese and US presidents agreed to pause portions of their tariff war—a temporary truce.

Iran as Flashpoint, Again

Reuters published a piece on January 13 titled "Trump's Iran Tariff Threat Risks Reopening China Rift." The article traced how Iran became a powder keg in US–China relations during Trump's first term (2017–2021).

Back then, Washington tightened sanctions on Tehran and blacklisted Huawei, accusing the Chinese telecom giant of selling tech to Iran. That led to the arrest of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei's daughter, Meng Wanzhou, in Canada—triggering a diplomatic crisis and sending bilateral tensions through the roof.

Now Trump's targeting Iran again. If he follows through, total US tariffs on Chinese exports could exceed 70%—way higher than the rates both sides agreed to last October when they dialed down their trade fight.

It's still unclear which countries or entities Trump will actually target. He hasn't named China explicitly. But Reuters noted Trump has a track record of making bombastic statements that could upend US foreign policy—only to back off later.

US–China "truce" forged in Busan last year now at risk if Trump's Iran tariffs target Beijing. (AP file photo)

US–China "truce" forged in Busan last year now at risk if Trump's Iran tariffs target Beijing. (AP file photo)

Beijing Calls Trump's Bluff

Wu Xinbo, Dean of Fudan University's School of International Relations, told Reuters that China sees through Trump's posturing. "China will call (Trump's) bluff. I can assure you that Trump has no guts to impose the extra 25% tariffs on China, and if he does, China will retaliate and he will be punished," said Wu.

Another Chinese scholar pushed back on the narrative that China and Iran are economically intertwined, noting that "China and Iran are not as close as in the public imagination".

China Customs data backs that up. Beijing has dramatically reduced imports from Iran in recent years. Through November last year, China imported just 2.9 billion USD worth of Iranian goods—a far cry from the 21 billion USD peak in 2018, during Trump's first presidency.

Some sources claim China's major oil companies stopped doing business with Iran in 2022. Yet China's purchases from Tehran still run into the billions, thanks to independent refiners handling shipments.

China as Convenient Scapegoat

Wang Jin, a researcher at Beijing's Dialogue Think Tank, told reporters that "China is just an excuse, a kind of disguise for the Trump administration, to impose new pressure (on) Iran."

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning responded to Trump's tariff threat on January 13. She stated that China's position on tariffs is crystal clear: tariff wars produce no winners. Beijing will firmly defend its legitimate rights and interests.

Analysts warn that Trump's renewed attempt to cut Iran off from global trade could heighten worries about the Belt and Road Initiative. Iran serves as a strategic hub for Chinese goods heading to the Middle East.

This tariff gambit has cast doubt on Trump's planned April visit to China. Observers had expected him to seal a comprehensive trade deal with Beijing during that trip.

The Wall Street Journal echoed Reuters' concerns, warning that new tariffs on Iran's trading partners could wreck the US–China trade truce.

But Reuters also cited Xu Tianchen, a senior analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit, who questioned whether Trump's tariff policy is even enforceable. "Last year he announced tariffs related to 'illicit' Russian oil trade, but their implementation was patchy." Xu said.

He went on stating that "Trump is also the kind of person who likes bullying the weak," Xu said. "He should manage his actions to avoid these tariffs escalating into direct confrontation with China".

Recommended Articles