Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Vanuatu to Australia: Learn What Respect Means

Blog

Vanuatu to Australia: Learn What Respect Means
Blog

Blog

Vanuatu to Australia: Learn What Respect Means

2025-09-30 09:20 Last Updated At:09:20

Vanuatu's Minister of Internal Affairs, Andrew Napuat, just dropped a bombshell that’s reverberating across the Pacific: Australia should learn what respect means.

Andrew Napuat, Vanuatu's Minister of Internal Affairs, who is tired of Australia's attitude.

Andrew Napuat, Vanuatu's Minister of Internal Affairs, who is tired of Australia's attitude.

As policing cooperation between China and Vanuatu forges ahead, Australia’s claims to "respect autonomy" ring hollow as it publicly questions and tries to undermine the partnership, exposing a glaring contradiction in its regional security rhetoric.
 
Following a recent visit to China, Napuat announced that he would work with Beijing to formalize the development of his country's policing capabilities, revealing that a new memorandum of understanding was on the verge of being signed to lock in Chinese police assistance. The ink was barely dry on the news when the Australian government scrambled to react, with Minister for the Pacific Pat Conroy dismissively framing it as merely comments from "one particular minister" - A blatant attempt to downplay its significance.

Chinese police experts conducting training in Vanuatu, much to Australia's dismay.

Chinese police experts conducting training in Vanuatu, much to Australia's dismay.

In an exclusive interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), Napuat hit back hard, slamming Conroy's statement as both "arrogant" and "ignorant." He stressed that this wasn't a solo act but a collective decision by the Vanuatu government, reminding Canberra to get its facts straight before commenting. "I respectfully understand his freedom and his right to make those kind comments, but he also needs to respect the internal processes happening here… This is my piece of advice to my friend in Australia."

Canberra's Condescension Backfires

This whole spat perfectly illustrates the increasingly assertive stance Pacific island nations are taking in their foreign policy. Napuat noted that while Vanuatu respects the 2022 Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) communiqué championing a "Pacific family first" approach, this doesn't mean surrendering its sovereign right to make its own decisions.
 
"Whatever is decided at that (PIF leaders) level is something that all the Pacific island countries respect, but at the end of the day those kinds of agreements don’t limit what each sovereign country wants to do in terms of its relationships", he stated.
 
Regarding the upcoming memorandum, Napuat clarified that it’s no conspiracy; rather, it was simply "formalising what we’re already working on together". It doesn't signal a long-term or permanent presence but serves as a "guiding" document to outline the framework for police training and capacity-building.

He also made a point to add that Australia had already been directly informed. "Australia knew very well, and we were up front with them when we told them we are just wanting to sort out the way we manage our relations with our partners, and we are going to sign an MoU (with China)."

Chinese police experts conducting training in Vanuatu, much to Australia's dismay.

Chinese police experts conducting training in Vanuatu, much to Australia's dismay.

Sovereignty, Not Submission

As it turns out, Vanuatu has its own core concerns, like building up its policing capacity and tackling climate change, which don't always align with the security-first priorities of its traditional partners.
 
Napuat's call to action was clear: "Our development partners need to come and sit with us and talk with us so they can fully understand what our needs are, and then we can work together to address the needs which are more relevant to our people.”
 
Let's be real: this all stems from Australia's deep-seated anxiety over China’s growing influence in the Pacific. Canberra frequently insists it is the region's security partner of choice, scrambling to lock down this status with various agreements. But as the minister from Vanuatu has made crystal clear, its cooperation with China isn’t aimed at Australia, nor is it exclusive. It is simply an independent choice based on Vanuatu's own needs.
 
Meanwhile, in Beijing, the response was a masterclass in diplomacy. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated that China-Vanuatu cooperation is built on mutual respect, equal consultation, mutual benefit, openness, and inclusivity. He affirmed that China will continue to provide support based on Vanuatu's wishes and needs to strengthen friendly exchanges and bring benefits to both peoples.
 
The message couldn't be plainer: China respects Vanuatu's sovereignty, and its cooperation isn't about targeting anyone else.
 
Three Key Takeaways
This episode reveals three undeniable trends.
 
First, Pacific island nations are taking charge and are done being pushed around.
 
Second, Australia's hypocritical double-speak has been publicly exposed.
 
And finally, China’s transparent, needs-based cooperation shows up the competitive, zero-sum games played by others.
 
Napuat didn't give a specific timeline for signing the memorandum but confirmed that both sides are near the "final state" and could sign it at any moment. This shows that regardless of the external noise, the China-Vanuatu partnership is moving forward on its own terms. For Australia, the real takeaway isn't to fret about China's presence, but to seriously reflect on its own posture and learn how to engage with its island partners as equals who deserve respect.
 
In today's complex world, Pacific nations will not be ignored; they want partners who respect their sovereign priorities—from security to climate change and development. If Australia continues to see the region only through a paranoid, zero-sum lens of "permanent competition" with China, it will only succeed in shredding what's left of its own credibility.
 
The Vanuatu Minister of Internal Affairs’ parting shot says it all, and it’s a message that resonates far beyond just Australia: "I understand his freedom and his right to make these kinds of comments, but also, he needs to respect the internal processes that are happening here."




Deep Throat

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Trump just rolled out another tariff threat, and this time Iran's trading partners are in his crosshairs. On January 12, the US president announced a blanket 25% tariff on any country "doing business" with Tehran.

The international press immediately fixated on China—Iran's biggest trade partner. Reuters warned this could reignite the US–China trade war and shred the fragile truce both sides hammered out last year. But Chinese scholars aren't buying it. They say Trump lacks the nerve to slap Beijing with new tariffs, because China will hit back hard—and make him regret it.

Anti-government protests erupt in Iran. (AP photo)

Anti-government protests erupt in Iran. (AP photo)

The Financial Times reported on January 12 that these tariffs—which took effect immediately—could slam China, India, Turkey, Pakistan, the UAE, Brazil, and Iraq. All of them trade heavily with Iran. Russia sealed a new free trade deal with Iran in 2025, making it another potential target.

CNN pointed out the stakes for Beijing. China trades with both Iran and the US, so if Washington applies these tariffs, Chinese goods entering America could see costs spike. The network recalled that after last year's summit in Busan, South Korea, the Chinese and US presidents agreed to pause portions of their tariff war—a temporary truce.

Iran as Flashpoint, Again

Reuters published a piece on January 13 titled "Trump's Iran Tariff Threat Risks Reopening China Rift." The article traced how Iran became a powder keg in US–China relations during Trump's first term (2017–2021).

Back then, Washington tightened sanctions on Tehran and blacklisted Huawei, accusing the Chinese telecom giant of selling tech to Iran. That led to the arrest of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei's daughter, Meng Wanzhou, in Canada—triggering a diplomatic crisis and sending bilateral tensions through the roof.

Now Trump's targeting Iran again. If he follows through, total US tariffs on Chinese exports could exceed 70%—way higher than the rates both sides agreed to last October when they dialed down their trade fight.

It's still unclear which countries or entities Trump will actually target. He hasn't named China explicitly. But Reuters noted Trump has a track record of making bombastic statements that could upend US foreign policy—only to back off later.

US–China "truce" forged in Busan last year now at risk if Trump's Iran tariffs target Beijing. (AP file photo)

US–China "truce" forged in Busan last year now at risk if Trump's Iran tariffs target Beijing. (AP file photo)

Beijing Calls Trump's Bluff

Wu Xinbo, Dean of Fudan University's School of International Relations, told Reuters that China sees through Trump's posturing. "China will call (Trump's) bluff. I can assure you that Trump has no guts to impose the extra 25% tariffs on China, and if he does, China will retaliate and he will be punished," said Wu.

Another Chinese scholar pushed back on the narrative that China and Iran are economically intertwined, noting that "China and Iran are not as close as in the public imagination".

China Customs data backs that up. Beijing has dramatically reduced imports from Iran in recent years. Through November last year, China imported just 2.9 billion USD worth of Iranian goods—a far cry from the 21 billion USD peak in 2018, during Trump's first presidency.

Some sources claim China's major oil companies stopped doing business with Iran in 2022. Yet China's purchases from Tehran still run into the billions, thanks to independent refiners handling shipments.

China as Convenient Scapegoat

Wang Jin, a researcher at Beijing's Dialogue Think Tank, told reporters that "China is just an excuse, a kind of disguise for the Trump administration, to impose new pressure (on) Iran."

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning responded to Trump's tariff threat on January 13. She stated that China's position on tariffs is crystal clear: tariff wars produce no winners. Beijing will firmly defend its legitimate rights and interests.

Analysts warn that Trump's renewed attempt to cut Iran off from global trade could heighten worries about the Belt and Road Initiative. Iran serves as a strategic hub for Chinese goods heading to the Middle East.

This tariff gambit has cast doubt on Trump's planned April visit to China. Observers had expected him to seal a comprehensive trade deal with Beijing during that trip.

The Wall Street Journal echoed Reuters' concerns, warning that new tariffs on Iran's trading partners could wreck the US–China trade truce.

But Reuters also cited Xu Tianchen, a senior analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit, who questioned whether Trump's tariff policy is even enforceable. "Last year he announced tariffs related to 'illicit' Russian oil trade, but their implementation was patchy." Xu said.

He went on stating that "Trump is also the kind of person who likes bullying the weak," Xu said. "He should manage his actions to avoid these tariffs escalating into direct confrontation with China".

Recommended Articles