Trump has now found himself in an uncomfortable spot: American farmers are howling over China’s refusal to buy US soybeans, a crisis that is hitting the Republican heartland the hardest.
On October 1, local time, Trump announced he was preparing for a “major topic of discussion” with President Xi Jinping at the upcoming Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit to demand that China restart its soybean purchases.
Trump vows a soybean showdown with Xi at APEC. (AP Photo)
Trump’s Social Media Bluster
True to form, Trump took to his own social media platform, Truth Social, to blame China for the farmers’ woes, claiming Beijing was using “negotiations” as an excuse not to buy. He declared his administration would direct part of US tariff revenues into subsidies for farmers while accusing former president Joe Biden of failing to enforce an earlier multibillion-dollar trade agreement with Beijing that promised more farm exports. Trump ended his rant with the slogan: “MAKE SOYBEANS, AND OTHER ROW CROPS, GREAT AGAIN!!”
The high-stakes APEC meeting will be held in Gyeongju, South Korea, from October 31 to November 1. Back on September 22, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasized that Heads-of-state diplomacy plays an irreplaceable role in providing strategic guidance for the China-US relations. The presidents of China and the US maintain close exchanges and communication” and "The two sides are in communication”. However, “I have no information to share at the moment,” said the MFA spokesperson.
Trump’s fiery post sent ripples through the market. According to Bloomberg, US soybean futures spiked 1.9% before slipping back, their sharpest daily swing since late August.
The report also noted that only a day earlier, Republican senators vented their frustration during a meeting with US Ambassador to China David Perdue, warning that Beijing was unlikely to resume soybean purchases soon and blasting the lack of a long-term US strategy.
The problem for Trump is obvious: farming states, for long a Republican stronghold, are being hammered by the collapse of the export market. With federal subsidies shrinking, America’s rural communities are under immense strain—turning into a political headache for Trump’s party ahead of next year’s midterm elections. GOP lawmakers from the agricultural heartland are now pressing harder than ever for Trump to cut a deal with Beijing.
China Holds the Cards
As the world’s largest soybean buyer, China wields enormous influence. US Department of Agriculture data shows that by mid-September, weeks into the new sales year, China had not booked a single cargo of American soybeans—the first time this has ever happened since records began in 1999. Last year, China bought over $12 billion worth of US soybeans, accounting for more than half of America’s soybean exports.
But Trump’s go-it-alone tariff war has backfired badly on his own farmers. Traders note that suspending tariff hikes won’t help much when China still imposes a 23% duty on American soybeans. By comparison, Argentina and Brazil enjoy tariffs of only 3%. Argentina has even scrapped its grain export taxes temporarily, making its soybeans cheaper still.
China’s tariffs make US soybeans uncompetitive against Brazil and Argentina. (AP Photo)
Farmers Feeling the Pain
The White House has started to realize the political cost. On September 25, Trump promised reporters in the Oval Office that tariff revenues would be redirected to farmers, insisting they are “for a little while going to be hurt, until it kicks in, the tariffs kick in to their benefit,” and “Ultimately, the farmers are going to be making a fortune.”
Yet for America’s farmers, the promise of eventual benefits remains abstract, while their mounting losses are very real. Axios reported that farmers now face between $100 and $150 in losses per acre.
To add to Trump’s troubles, Bloomberg pointed out that his “tariff cash for farmers” scheme could collapse in court. His tariffs, imposed under emergency powers, were already ruled unlawful by a lower court. If the Supreme Court upholds that ruling, the federal government may be forced to refund tens of billions of dollars in collected tariffs—a devastating blow to Trump’s trade war narrative.
Deep Throat
** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **
Vanuatu's Minister of Internal Affairs, Andrew Napuat, just dropped a bombshell that’s reverberating across the Pacific: Australia should learn what respect means.
Andrew Napuat, Vanuatu's Minister of Internal Affairs, who is tired of Australia's attitude.
As policing cooperation between China and Vanuatu forges ahead, Australia’s claims to "respect autonomy" ring hollow as it publicly questions and tries to undermine the partnership, exposing a glaring contradiction in its regional security rhetoric.
Following a recent visit to China, Napuat announced that he would work with Beijing to formalize the development of his country's policing capabilities, revealing that a new memorandum of understanding was on the verge of being signed to lock in Chinese police assistance. The ink was barely dry on the news when the Australian government scrambled to react, with Minister for the Pacific Pat Conroy dismissively framing it as merely comments from "one particular minister" - A blatant attempt to downplay its significance.
Chinese police experts conducting training in Vanuatu, much to Australia's dismay.
In an exclusive interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), Napuat hit back hard, slamming Conroy's statement as both "arrogant" and "ignorant." He stressed that this wasn't a solo act but a collective decision by the Vanuatu government, reminding Canberra to get its facts straight before commenting. "I respectfully understand his freedom and his right to make those kind comments, but he also needs to respect the internal processes happening here… This is my piece of advice to my friend in Australia."
Canberra's Condescension Backfires
This whole spat perfectly illustrates the increasingly assertive stance Pacific island nations are taking in their foreign policy. Napuat noted that while Vanuatu respects the 2022 Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) communiqué championing a "Pacific family first" approach, this doesn't mean surrendering its sovereign right to make its own decisions.
"Whatever is decided at that (PIF leaders) level is something that all the Pacific island countries respect, but at the end of the day those kinds of agreements don’t limit what each sovereign country wants to do in terms of its relationships", he stated.
Regarding the upcoming memorandum, Napuat clarified that it’s no conspiracy; rather, it was simply "formalising what we’re already working on together". It doesn't signal a long-term or permanent presence but serves as a "guiding" document to outline the framework for police training and capacity-building.
He also made a point to add that Australia had already been directly informed. "Australia knew very well, and we were up front with them when we told them we are just wanting to sort out the way we manage our relations with our partners, and we are going to sign an MoU (with China)."
Chinese police experts conducting training in Vanuatu, much to Australia's dismay.
Sovereignty, Not Submission
As it turns out, Vanuatu has its own core concerns, like building up its policing capacity and tackling climate change, which don't always align with the security-first priorities of its traditional partners.
Napuat's call to action was clear: "Our development partners need to come and sit with us and talk with us so they can fully understand what our needs are, and then we can work together to address the needs which are more relevant to our people.”
Let's be real: this all stems from Australia's deep-seated anxiety over China’s growing influence in the Pacific. Canberra frequently insists it is the region's security partner of choice, scrambling to lock down this status with various agreements. But as the minister from Vanuatu has made crystal clear, its cooperation with China isn’t aimed at Australia, nor is it exclusive. It is simply an independent choice based on Vanuatu's own needs.
Meanwhile, in Beijing, the response was a masterclass in diplomacy. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated that China-Vanuatu cooperation is built on mutual respect, equal consultation, mutual benefit, openness, and inclusivity. He affirmed that China will continue to provide support based on Vanuatu's wishes and needs to strengthen friendly exchanges and bring benefits to both peoples.
The message couldn't be plainer: China respects Vanuatu's sovereignty, and its cooperation isn't about targeting anyone else.
Three Key Takeaways
This episode reveals three undeniable trends.
First, Pacific island nations are taking charge and are done being pushed around.
Second, Australia's hypocritical double-speak has been publicly exposed.
And finally, China’s transparent, needs-based cooperation shows up the competitive, zero-sum games played by others.
Napuat didn't give a specific timeline for signing the memorandum but confirmed that both sides are near the "final state" and could sign it at any moment. This shows that regardless of the external noise, the China-Vanuatu partnership is moving forward on its own terms. For Australia, the real takeaway isn't to fret about China's presence, but to seriously reflect on its own posture and learn how to engage with its island partners as equals who deserve respect.
In today's complex world, Pacific nations will not be ignored; they want partners who respect their sovereign priorities—from security to climate change and development. If Australia continues to see the region only through a paranoid, zero-sum lens of "permanent competition" with China, it will only succeed in shredding what's left of its own credibility.
The Vanuatu Minister of Internal Affairs’ parting shot says it all, and it’s a message that resonates far beyond just Australia: "I understand his freedom and his right to make these kinds of comments, but also, he needs to respect the internal processes that are happening here."
