Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

China's Rare Earth Squeeze Sends Pentagon Scrambling for $1 Billion Stockpile

Blog

China's Rare Earth Squeeze Sends Pentagon Scrambling for $1 Billion Stockpile
Blog

Blog

China's Rare Earth Squeeze Sends Pentagon Scrambling for $1 Billion Stockpile

2025-10-14 17:36 Last Updated At:17:36

In a move that screams desperation, the Pentagon is reportedly launching a US$1 billion global spending spree for critical minerals. According to the Financial Times, this stockpiling frenzy is a direct response to China's commanding lead in the rare-earth metals essential for America's defence industry.

The Pentagon is on a $1 billion shopping spree for critical minerals, the FT reports.

The Pentagon is on a $1 billion shopping spree for critical minerals, the FT reports.

Public notices from the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) reveal the Trump administration is hitting the accelerator on building up its national stockpile. This isn't just a routine top-up; it's a panicked reaction to Beijing's recent export controls on several rare earths, a stark reminder of China's stranglehold on supply chains for everything from iPhones to F-35s.

One former US defence official didn't mince words, stating, "They [the Pentagon] take stockpiling very seriously." He added that they are aggressively expanding their search for new, non-Chinese sources for these crucial defence materials. Another ex-official confirmed that the US$1 billion plan represents a significant and urgent escalation of previous efforts.

With China tightening its grip, the Pentagon is ramping up its stockpiling efforts with a massive $1 billion push.

With China tightening its grip, the Pentagon is ramping up its stockpiling efforts with a massive $1 billion push.

Beijing Tightens the Screws

This all kicked off on October 9th, when China's Ministry of Commerce dropped a bombshell by tightening export controls on rare-earth items. As if that wasn't enough, Beijing followed up with more measures, expanding the list to include new rare-earth elements, processing equipment, and even superhard materials, lithium batteries, and synthetic graphite anode materials.

The Wall Street Journal called it "a nearly unprecedented" move, highlighting the severity of Beijing's play. Unsurprisingly, the Financial Times noted that these controls have sent a fresh wave of anxiety through Washington and European capitals, who are now scrambling to secure their supply of these vital metals.

Let's be clear: the FT points out that for the Pentagon, this isn't just about economics—it's a core national security issue. These minerals are the lifeblood of nearly all modern weapons systems, from radar to missile detection. Under the Trump administration, this focus has sharpened dramatically, leading to the current accelerated stockpiling. The Pentagon is now so concerned it's even looking to hoard metals it never bothered with before.

Stephanie Barna, a lawyer at Covington & Burling in Washington, spelled out the grim reality: if China decides to turn off the tap completely, it would deal a "direct, obvious and adverse" blow to America's high-tech military capabilities, crippling its ability to handle any strategic conflict.

So, what's on the DLA's shopping list? We're talking big numbers: up to US$500 million for cobalt, US$245 million for antimony, another US$100 million for tantalum from a mystery US supplier, and US$45 million for scandium sourced from Rio Tinto and APL Engineered Materials, an Illinois company with a notable presence in Japan and China.

An industry insider noted that this spending spree shows Washington "recognises the importance of these critical minerals and wants to support all of its existing domestic capacity." While they suggested it might be a bit early for full-blown hoarding by Western nations, they conceded that the level of concern is undeniably on the rise.

The DLA already has warehouses across the US filled with dozens of strategic materials, valued at US$1.3 billion as of 2023. But there's a catch: these stockpiles are locked down tight. They can only be touched in wartime or if the Under Secretary of Defense declares a defence need and gets a sign-off from the President himself.

Market Mayhem

The ripple effects are already being felt. With Chinese exports of germanium drying up, prices have skyrocketed this year. Western traders are now warning of full-blown "panic" in the market as companies scramble for supply—exactly the kind of chaos the Pentagon is desperately trying to get ahead of.

It's not just germanium. The price of antimony trioxide has nearly doubled in the last year, and even major automakers are finding it tough to get their hands on the rare-earth materials they need.

This is all backed by serious cash. Trump’s "Big and Beautiful" Act has set aside a whopping US$7.5 billion for critical minerals. This includes US$2 billion to beef up the Pentagon's stockpile, which it plans to burn through by early 2027. Another US$5 billion is tagged for supply chain investments, plus US$500 million for a credit program to spur private investment. According to one former defence official, thanks to this act, the relevant agencies are now "well-funded" to tackle the problem. The DLA, for its part, is staying quiet.

Take scandium, for example. Global consumption is only about 30-40 tonnes a year, and China is a key producer. The DLA's own filings admit that Beijing's export controls are already squeezing the supply chain for this mineral.

The DLA is hoping its deal with United States Antimony Corporation (USAC) will build up enough inventory to keep the industrial base running in a crisis, while also helping USAC weather market storms. The company's CEO, Gary Evans, says they source materials from a diverse list of countries including Canada, Mexico, Australia, and Peru, but while USAC posted US$15 million in revenue for 2024, it's keeping its actual antimony output under wraps.

To put that in perspective, US Geological Survey data shows the DLA deal is for around 3,000 tonnes of antimony metal. That's a decent chunk, but still a fraction of the 24,000 tonnes the US consumed in 2024 alone.

But some are skeptical. Cristina Belda of Argus Media said the market was stunned by the sheer volume of metals the DLA is trying to buy. Many insiders think the numbers are totally unrealistic, especially on a five-year timeline, since the amounts requested are more than what the US currently produces and imports combined.

A World Without Chinese Supply

The shopping list doesn't stop there. DLA filings also show it's eyeing other elements like tungsten, bismuth, and indium to bolster its reserves.

Solomon Cefai at Fastmarkets warns that the proposed amounts of bismuth and indium are huge compared to the global market. Trying to buy that much without access to Chinese suppliers, he says, would inevitably put immense pressure on an already tight market.

Without China's supply, analysts warn the Pentagon's buying frenzy will strain global markets.

Without China's supply, analysts warn the Pentagon's buying frenzy will strain global markets.

Beijing's Official Line

When pressed on October 9th, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce gave the official line: these are dual-use items, and export controls are standard international practice. Beijing is simply acting within the law to regulate items with Chinese components to protect its national security, serve its interests, and meet its international non-proliferation duties.

The spokesperson added that as a responsible global power, China's actions are consistent with its goal of safeguarding world peace and regional stability. Beijing remains open to dialogue and cooperation, they said, to promote compliant trade and ensure global supply chains remain stable and secure. The message is clear: play by the rules, and we can talk.




Deep Throat

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Trump just rolled out another tariff threat, and this time Iran's trading partners are in his crosshairs. On January 12, the US president announced a blanket 25% tariff on any country "doing business" with Tehran.

The international press immediately fixated on China—Iran's biggest trade partner. Reuters warned this could reignite the US–China trade war and shred the fragile truce both sides hammered out last year. But Chinese scholars aren't buying it. They say Trump lacks the nerve to slap Beijing with new tariffs, because China will hit back hard—and make him regret it.

Anti-government protests erupt in Iran. (AP photo)

Anti-government protests erupt in Iran. (AP photo)

The Financial Times reported on January 12 that these tariffs—which took effect immediately—could slam China, India, Turkey, Pakistan, the UAE, Brazil, and Iraq. All of them trade heavily with Iran. Russia sealed a new free trade deal with Iran in 2025, making it another potential target.

CNN pointed out the stakes for Beijing. China trades with both Iran and the US, so if Washington applies these tariffs, Chinese goods entering America could see costs spike. The network recalled that after last year's summit in Busan, South Korea, the Chinese and US presidents agreed to pause portions of their tariff war—a temporary truce.

Iran as Flashpoint, Again

Reuters published a piece on January 13 titled "Trump's Iran Tariff Threat Risks Reopening China Rift." The article traced how Iran became a powder keg in US–China relations during Trump's first term (2017–2021).

Back then, Washington tightened sanctions on Tehran and blacklisted Huawei, accusing the Chinese telecom giant of selling tech to Iran. That led to the arrest of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei's daughter, Meng Wanzhou, in Canada—triggering a diplomatic crisis and sending bilateral tensions through the roof.

Now Trump's targeting Iran again. If he follows through, total US tariffs on Chinese exports could exceed 70%—way higher than the rates both sides agreed to last October when they dialed down their trade fight.

It's still unclear which countries or entities Trump will actually target. He hasn't named China explicitly. But Reuters noted Trump has a track record of making bombastic statements that could upend US foreign policy—only to back off later.

US–China "truce" forged in Busan last year now at risk if Trump's Iran tariffs target Beijing. (AP file photo)

US–China "truce" forged in Busan last year now at risk if Trump's Iran tariffs target Beijing. (AP file photo)

Beijing Calls Trump's Bluff

Wu Xinbo, Dean of Fudan University's School of International Relations, told Reuters that China sees through Trump's posturing. "China will call (Trump's) bluff. I can assure you that Trump has no guts to impose the extra 25% tariffs on China, and if he does, China will retaliate and he will be punished," said Wu.

Another Chinese scholar pushed back on the narrative that China and Iran are economically intertwined, noting that "China and Iran are not as close as in the public imagination".

China Customs data backs that up. Beijing has dramatically reduced imports from Iran in recent years. Through November last year, China imported just 2.9 billion USD worth of Iranian goods—a far cry from the 21 billion USD peak in 2018, during Trump's first presidency.

Some sources claim China's major oil companies stopped doing business with Iran in 2022. Yet China's purchases from Tehran still run into the billions, thanks to independent refiners handling shipments.

China as Convenient Scapegoat

Wang Jin, a researcher at Beijing's Dialogue Think Tank, told reporters that "China is just an excuse, a kind of disguise for the Trump administration, to impose new pressure (on) Iran."

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning responded to Trump's tariff threat on January 13. She stated that China's position on tariffs is crystal clear: tariff wars produce no winners. Beijing will firmly defend its legitimate rights and interests.

Analysts warn that Trump's renewed attempt to cut Iran off from global trade could heighten worries about the Belt and Road Initiative. Iran serves as a strategic hub for Chinese goods heading to the Middle East.

This tariff gambit has cast doubt on Trump's planned April visit to China. Observers had expected him to seal a comprehensive trade deal with Beijing during that trip.

The Wall Street Journal echoed Reuters' concerns, warning that new tariffs on Iran's trading partners could wreck the US–China trade truce.

But Reuters also cited Xu Tianchen, a senior analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit, who questioned whether Trump's tariff policy is even enforceable. "Last year he announced tariffs related to 'illicit' Russian oil trade, but their implementation was patchy." Xu said.

He went on stating that "Trump is also the kind of person who likes bullying the weak," Xu said. "He should manage his actions to avoid these tariffs escalating into direct confrontation with China".

Recommended Articles