Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Family Comes First: Hegseth Blurs the Line Between Duty and Vacation — Again

Blog

Family Comes First: Hegseth Blurs the Line Between Duty and Vacation — Again
Blog

Blog

Family Comes First: Hegseth Blurs the Line Between Duty and Vacation — Again

2026-06-09 22:28 Last Updated At:22:28

Hong Kong people hold senior officials to a strict standard: public duties and private life must never mix. When any official exploits their position for personal gain — even over something trivial — it becomes a major scandal, and their job can be on the line.

In today's America, things work differently. The President and certain Cabinet members blur that line as a matter of routine. They remain shameless, carry on without consequence, and their positions stay firmly intact — a state of affairs that leaves many shaking their heads.

The latest episode: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently made an official visit to France, bringing his wife and six children aboard a military aircraft. The trip looked less like a state mission and more like a family vacation. Security personnel were stretched to their limits protecting the entire entourage, public expenditure ballooned significantly, and Hegseth simply carried on enjoying his family bonding trip without a care in the world.

Six kids, one official visit — Hegseth turned France into a family vacation at public expense.

Six kids, one official visit — Hegseth turned France into a family vacation at public expense.

His track record of blurring public and private lines is well established. He has previously brought his wife into classified military briefings and arranged for his brother to be appointed to a senior post at the Pentagon — raising questions about violations of the federal anti-nepotism law. He treats such laws as though they were invisible and ignores them entirely.

Hegseth arrived in France on Saturday to attend the 82nd anniversary of the D-Day landings. As he stepped off the military aircraft onto the tarmac at a Paris airport, the scene was unlike anything seen from other visiting defense ministers: hand-in-hand with his wife Jennifer, six children by his side, the whole family walking the red carpet together into the reception area. A Defense Department security official remarked with exasperation: "We have never seen anything like this before." 

Traveling with his entire family as though on a parent-child tour of France, Hegseth drew considerable attention. American media pressed the Defense Department: was public money being used to bring his family along for a leisure trip to France? A spokesperson, clearly aware of the sensitivity, was quick to explain that the family members' travel costs were covered by the Secretary himself — though exactly how much was paid remained unclear. 

The issue goes beyond travel costs. The security expenditures are substantial. Officials from the Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID), responsible for Hegseth's security during the visit, told The Washington Post that because the Secretary was accompanied by his wife and six children, the security perimeter expanded enormously. A large number of additional special agents had to be deployed for protection, including an advance team for pre-deployment arrangements, along with increased transportation, accommodation, allowances, and additional security equipment — all of which drove up costs significantly.

Some within the Defense Department have raised concerns that given the ongoing tensions with Iran, the security threat to Hegseth remains considerable. Taking a large group of family members on an overseas trip only adds to the security burden and may divert resources that would otherwise be dedicated to protecting the official himself.

Hegseth, however, acts on impulse and dismisses the grievances of those beneath him with contempt. This is not the first time. In October last year, he traveled to Hawaii on official business as Secretary — again with his entire family in tow, all enjoying the sunshine and beaches together. Whether the children's travel costs were paid by him on that occasion remained a muddy and evasive non-answer from the Defense Department.

Since Hegseth took office 17 months ago, CID officials have been crying out for relief. In addition to protecting him and his current family, they are also responsible for the security of his two ex-wives, their respective partners, and their children — who live in Minnesota and Tennessee respectively. The sheer manpower required for all these separate households is staggering. He has been married three times: in addition to his current wife's three children from her previous marriage, he has four biological children of his own. With so many people across several households all requiring protection, it is little wonder that security officials are at their wits' end.

This "family holiday tour" of France is just one episode in Hegseth's long record of mixing public office with private interests. After taking office as Defense Secretary, he brought his wife Jennifer to NATO headquarters in Brussels, where she sat in on meetings with senior officials to discuss strategy regarding the Russia-Ukraine war — sessions involving a significant amount of classified information. She also attended a meeting with the British Defense Secretary, with no apparent concern for protocol. 

Jennifer is a former Fox News producer with no official government role — she simply tagged along, holding onto her husband's coattails, collecting information.

Hegseth's wife Jennifer — a private citizen — was allowed to sit in on a classified NATO briefing.

Hegseth's wife Jennifer — a private citizen — was allowed to sit in on a classified NATO briefing.

On top of that, he arranged for his brother Phil to be appointed as a liaison officer at the Defense Department and simultaneously as a senior adviser at the Department of Homeland Security — leveraging his ministerial authority to secure his younger brother a comfortable position. 

Phil had previously founded a podcast production company and worked in social media. He has virtually no experience in military or defense affairs, yet rode on his brother's coattails to land a senior post at the Pentagon — naturally stirring no shortage of whispers and criticism.

The United States has a federal anti-nepotism law that prohibits officials from hiring or promoting their own relatives. But Trump has long treated such laws as though they do not exist, and Hegseth naturally follows his lead, continuing to operate above the law.

As the old saying goes: when those at the top behave this way, those below will follow. When both the President and his Cabinet ministers fail to separate public duties from private interests, can anyone beneath them be expected to uphold integrity? History suggests that the moral decay of a political class may well be yet another harbinger of America's decline.




What Say You?

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

The US-Iran situation is volatile — talks and conflict are unfolding in parallel, with no clear resolution in sight. For Trump to make the right calls, he needs precise intelligence. Yet at this critical moment, serious infighting has erupted within the intelligence community. Tensions between the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) have intensified to the point of open hostility.

ODNI serves as Trump's all-seeing eye on intelligence, so any breakdown in CIA intelligence flow could cause dangerous misjudgments. Worse still, the incoming Director of National Intelligence, Pulte, is a staunch Trump loyalist with no intelligence background — making cooperation with the CIA even more difficult, and the situation likely to deteriorate further.

After taking office last year, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was consistently at odds with the CIA, with tensions escalating relentlessly. The CIA has angrily halted the provision of some intelligence on Iran — a move detrimental to the war effort.

After taking office last year, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was consistently at odds with the CIA, with tensions escalating relentlessly. The CIA has angrily halted the provision of some intelligence on Iran — a move detrimental to the war effort.

Three words capture the state of the US intelligence system right now: a complete mess. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has abruptly resigned after clashing with Trump. The official reason cited her husband's illness, but in reality, she was dismissed and will leave by the end of the month.

At the same time, Reuters, citing informed sources, revealed that since taking office in February last year, Gabbard had been in constant conflict with the CIA — and that tensions had recently escalated sharply. The CIA has now reportedly stopped providing certain intelligence assessments to ODNI, including analyses related to the Iran conflict.

Insiders say friction erupted shortly after Gabbard took office. She moved against the CIA on multiple fronts. First, she tightened control over the production of the President's Daily Brief, sharply reducing the CIA's direct involvement. Then she established a special task force, claiming it was meant to eliminate politicization within the intelligence system. The task force, however, bypassed the standard intelligence-sharing and declassification procedures that the CIA should have been part of — and operated independently. That infuriated CIA Director Ratcliffe.

ODNI offered a different account, accusing the CIA of obstructing the task force's access to necessary intelligence. Both sides are entrenched in their positions, and the dispute has turned deeply acrimonious.

The infighting has destroyed mutual trust. In retaliation, the CIA has sharply reduced the intelligence it shares with ODNI on Iran. The consequences could be severe: disrupting the intelligence pipeline to the president, distorting battlefield assessments, and ultimately triggering catastrophic decisions.

Gabbard's departure at the end of the month might have offered a chance to reset relations. But Trump has made an unexpected move. He has appointed Pulte — currently head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees mortgage regulation — as her successor. Pulte has no intelligence experience whatsoever. He is, however, a fiercely loyal Trump enforcer, clearly positioned to aggressively purge what Trump sees as "deep state" elements within the CIA and other intelligence agencies. If Pulte assumes full control, tensions with the CIA are almost certain to escalate.

Pulte, who is set to replace Gabbard, has no intelligence background. His appointment reflects Trump's need for a loyal enforcer to carry out a sweeping crackdown on the CIA — a move that will inevitably intensify their conflict.

Pulte, who is set to replace Gabbard, has no intelligence background. His appointment reflects Trump's need for a loyal enforcer to carry out a sweeping crackdown on the CIA — a move that will inevitably intensify their conflict.

Pulte must still clear the Senate confirmation process. His nomination was immediately attacked by Democratic lawmakers, who argue he lacks any intelligence credentials. They describe him as a partisan enforcer who has repeatedly helped Trump target political opponents — and question the logic of entrusting national security to such a figure.

Those criticisms are not unfounded. Pulte has reportedly exposed alleged "mortgage document fraud" involving Trump's political rivals, using such material to apply legal pressure — tactics widely seen as ruthless. Trump values his aggression and loyalty, which explains the selection. As DNI, Pulte's primary mission will be to overhaul the 18 intelligence agencies under his authority, with the CIA as the main target.

Trump's animosity toward the CIA runs deep. During the 2016 "Russiagate" investigation, a group of intelligence officers participated in assessments he viewed as a "deep state" conspiracy against him — a grievance he has sought to settle ever since. Upon returning to power, he appointed Gabbard to lead ODNI with the key mission of purging the CIA. That decision planted the seeds of today's institutional warfare between the two agencies.

The US-Iran conflict and the Russia-Ukraine war remain fluid and unpredictable. Yet at this critical juncture, the US intelligence system is tearing itself apart — and the infighting is only getting worse. The leaders of Iran and Russia, watching this spectacle unfold, are surely smiling behind closed doors.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles