Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

The CIA's Dating App From Hell: How Spies Use Romance Scam Tactics to Recruit Chinese Assets

Blog

The CIA's Dating App From Hell: How Spies Use Romance Scam Tactics to Recruit Chinese Assets
Blog

Blog

The CIA's Dating App From Hell: How Spies Use Romance Scam Tactics to Recruit Chinese Assets

2025-06-18 18:21 Last Updated At:18:21

So here we are again – the CIA pulling back the curtain on its own operations, and frankly, what's revealed isn't particularly shocking if you understand how intelligence agencies actually work. The agency has been putting out recruitment videos on social media, brazenly targeting Chinese civil servants, while CIA Director Ratcliffe has made it crystal clear that China sits at the top of America's intelligence wish list. But what's fascinating is how a new book called "Supercommunicators" has inadvertently exposed the playbook these spies use – and it's basically the same tricks your grandmother warned you about regarding online dating scams.

CIA Director Ratcliffe isn't even trying to be subtle anymore - he's openly declared China as America's top intelligence target, and the agency is literally posting recruitment videos on social media trying to flip Chinese government workers. Talk about putting your cards on the table.

CIA Director Ratcliffe isn't even trying to be subtle anymore - he's openly declared China as America's top intelligence target, and the agency is literally posting recruitment videos on social media trying to flip Chinese government workers. Talk about putting your cards on the table.

When Spycraft Meets Psychology 101

Charles Duhigg's book dives deep into what he calls "super communication," and wouldn't you know it, the CIA has turned this into an art form. The premise is simple enough: people crave connection, and when you can make someone feel truly understood, you've got them hooked. It's psychological manipulation dressed up in academic language, but let's call it what it is.

The book features interviews with CIA operatives, including one called "Lawler" (obviously an alias), who trained at the infamous Camp Peary in Virginia. Here's the thing that might surprise you – these agents aren't spending all their time skulking around in shadows. They're at embassy parties, making small talk, being the most charming person in the room. Because that's what modern espionage really looks like.

A new book accidentally spills the tea on how CIA operatives recruit foreign officials - and surprise, surprise, their "super communication" techniques are basically the same psychological tricks used in romance scams. When you compare it to actual cases China's caught, the playbook is almost identical.

A new book accidentally spills the tea on how CIA operatives recruit foreign officials - and surprise, surprise, their "super communication" techniques are basically the same psychological tricks used in romance scams. When you compare it to actual cases China's caught, the playbook is almost identical.

The Chinese Target Who Wasn't Having It

Lawler's story gets interesting when he describes his failed attempt to recruit a Chinese official in Europe. The approach was textbook: repeated invitations to lunch and drinks, building rapport, then the soft pitch about sharing information for compensation. But here's where it gets real – the Chinese official shut it down immediately, saying such activities "would cost one's life."

That response tells you everything about how seriously China takes these threats. While Western officials might hem and haw, this person understood exactly what was being proposed and the consequences that would follow.

But here's where the CIA's persistence comes in. After striking out with the Chinese target, they didn't just give up – they reassigned Lawler to a new mission. This time, the target was a female diplomatic official from a Middle Eastern country who happened to be vacationing in Europe. Lawler "orchestrated" – their word, not mine – a chance encounter at a restaurant. After what the book describes as "considerable effort," he finally managed to establish what they call "emotional trust" and successfully opened his first gateway to intelligence gathering.

The Honey Trap Playbook

What's really eye-opening is comparing the CIA's documented techniques with actual cases published by China's Ministry of State Security. There's a striking pattern here that should make anyone working in sensitive positions sit up and pay attention.

Take the case of a Chinese military-industrial researcher who was approached while studying in the US. The recruitment followed the classic playbook: start with technical questions, build friendship through meals and conversations, gradually introduce financial incentives, and finally reveal the true nature of the relationship. It's a slow-burn approach that relies on the target becoming emotionally invested before they realize what's happening.

The researcher was eventually caught, but not before signing documents and providing intelligence for over a year. The "consulting company" employee who recruited him? Turns out he was working for American intelligence all along.

Why This Matters More Than Ever

Here's what should worry everyone: these techniques work because they exploit basic human psychology. The need for connection, friendship, and yes, financial security, are universal vulnerabilities. What we're seeing isn't some sophisticated James Bond operation – it's systematic emotional manipulation on an industrial scale.

The parallels to romance scams aren't coincidental. Both target isolation, build false intimacy, and use financial incentives to seal the deal. The only difference is the end goal: instead of draining your bank account, they want access to state secrets.

In today's geopolitical climate, where tensions between major powers are escalating, everyone needs to understand these tactics exist and are being actively deployed. Whether you're a government employee, work in tech, or have access to any sensitive information, you could be a target.

Stay sharp out there.

Lai Ting-yiu




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

As the Year of the Horse approaching, Hong Kong BNO holders in the UK are bracing for a gut punch. The festive season brings no joy—only anxiety. Mid-February marks the deadline for the UK government's consultation on raising permanent residency thresholds, and the verdict on whether BNO holders get a pass is about to drop.

The Home Office floated immigration reforms that would keep the "5+1" rule intact—five years of residence before you can apply—but the bar just shot up, with higher English proficiency requirements and stable income. For many, these hurdles are insurmountable.

Mahmood's stonewalling to BNO holders' demands signals bad news. The February verdict looms.

Mahmood's stonewalling to BNO holders' demands signals bad news. The February verdict looms.

Hong Kong BNO holders fired off "five demands" to the authorities, pleading for relief. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood's response was ice cold. Zero acknowledgment of their demands. Her dismissive tone signals one thing: exemptions for BNO holders look dead in the water.

If the final call goes all the way, thousands who waited five years will crash at the finish line. A return wave to Hong Kong is inevitable. The Hong Kong government needs to get ready.

The Dual Knockout Blow

The UK government didn't just raise the bar—it installed a double gate that slams shut on 60,000 people. First gate: English proficiency must hit B2 level, equivalent to A-Level, practically university standard. Second gate: annual income over the past three to five years must reach at least £12,570, with tax records to prove it.

Surveys by Hong Kong migrant organizations paint a grim picture: if these "dual requirements" become reality, 30% of BNO holders—roughly 60,000 people—will fail to qualify and get filtered out. No wonder panic is spreading.

While anxiety mounts, the UK government plays coy. Ambiguous statements. Equivocal attitudes. Nobody can read their hand. Now, with just one month until the announcement, BNO holders are reaching peak agitation. A group of Hong Kong voters in Mahmood's constituency drafted a joint letter, restating the "five demands" and requesting a face-to-face meeting to apply pressure.

Mahmood responded quickly—but only to say Hong Kong BNO holders could apply for permanent residency after five years. As for the "five demands"? Crickets. Instead, she reiterated that those granted permanent residency must meet three criteria: being "well-integrated," "economically self-sufficient," and "committed” to the communities they join.

Mahmood Goes Silent

One Hong Kong BNO holder who signed the petition decoded those three phrases: "integration" and "commitment" are code words for English proficiency and income levels. Translation: BNO holders applying for permanent residency must also clear these two hurdles.

These Hong Kong residents sent a follow-up letter to Mahmood, requesting a meeting to present their case in person. Her response? Radio silence. Phone calls to her constituency office go unanswered. She's clearly ducking any face-to-face encounter.

Mahmood is stonewalling, and nobody can do a thing about it. Frustrated BNO holders vent to yellow media outlets, angrily branding her "heartless." But here's the reality check: the Labour government's approval ratings are tanking. Reform UK is breathing down their necks on immigration. Immigration policy will err on the side of restriction, not relaxation. Naturally, they're inclined to treat BNO holders the same as everyone else. No special treatment. No "sentiment." The "five demands" might as well be whispers in the wind.

Two Paths Forward

Friends living in the UK lay out the scenario: if the UK government announces "no relaxation" next month, BNO holders who can't meet the requirements face two choices.

First option: return to Hong Kong and start over. After all, life in the UK hasn't been entirely rosy—living day after day in anxiety. "Returning home" might actually be a relief.

Second option: continue to "temporarily reside" in the UK on a BNO visa, becoming long-term temporary residents. But they'll remain in an unstable state, which won't be comfortable.

There's also a thornier complication: some BNO families migrated to the UK with their parents, and one spouse hasn't worked or earned any income for several years. If these family members don't meet the criteria for applying for permanent residency, it could trigger family separation or force the entire family to return to Hong Kong. They'll face an agonizing decision. Quite a mess.

No exemptions? Brace for the return wave.

No exemptions? Brace for the return wave.

My friend predicts that if the worst-case scenario materializes, a return wave is sure to come. For Hong Kong, there will be upsides and downsides. Either way, the government needs to get ready and figure out how to handle it.

Recommended Articles