Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Running on Fumes: 'Hong Kong Watch' Scrambles for Cash as Support Dries Up

Blog

Running on Fumes: 'Hong Kong Watch' Scrambles for Cash as Support Dries Up
Blog

Blog

Running on Fumes: 'Hong Kong Watch' Scrambles for Cash as Support Dries Up

2025-09-22 20:18 Last Updated At:20:18

Over the past few years, a few "troublemakers" have been busy stirring the pot and provoking foreign attacks against Hong Kong. The most notorious of these is the UK-based "Hong Kong Watch." In March 2023, the Hong Kong Police's National Security Department accused the group of violating the National Security Law and ordered it to take down its website, and put its founder, Benedict Rogers, on the wanted list. Yet, the group operates with impunity and has recently launched a series of malicious campaigns.

However, just like other anti-Hong Kong organizations, it's facing a serious funding crisis. While it might be doing slightly better than the National Endowment for Democracy (NED)—whose funding has been completely cut—its cash reserves will inevitably run dry. In a desperate scramble to survive, "Hong Kong Watch" is now putting on a big show, pretending to fight the UK government's potential change to the BNO path to residency from "5+1" to "10+1," hoping to squeeze money out of Hongkong BNO holders who've moved to the UK.

The problem is, with the UK economy in the doldrums, everyone is feeling the pinch, and when it comes to donations, the sentiment is a resounding "leave me alone."

A Calculated Performance

Following a petition signed by over 100,000 UK-based Hongkong BNO holders, the UK Parliament was prompted to debate changing the BNO "5+1" rule to "10+1." On the eve of this debate, "Hong Kong Watch" staged a grand performance right outside the Houses of Parliament. Not only did founder Benedict Rogers show up to wave flags and shout slogans, but several hawkish MPs were also invited for "friendly cameos" to demand the government stick to the "5+1" policy. The group even roped in the last Hong Kong Governor, Chris Patten, to put on a show of righteousness and speak out for Hongkong BNO holders in the UK.

An observant source noted that this elaborate performance by "Hong Kong Watch" is directly tied to its ongoing annual fundraising campaign. The "5+1" issue is a top concern for Hongkong BNO holders who have moved to the UK, and the group is betting that if it can appear to "successfully campaign" on their behalf, any donation would seem like a worthy investment. Once the cash starts flowing, it can continue to stir up trouble and push its "international front" in the UK, Canada, the US, and Australia.

However, a quick look at the crowdfunding progress posted by "Hong Kong Watch" on its social media tells a bleak story. Its 2025 fundraising drive has so far managed to pull in a mere £6,503 (about HK$68,000), a far cry from its annual target of £50,000 (about HK$530,000). With a massive £43,000 shortfall, reaching that goal looks to be an incredibly difficult task.

"Hong Kong Watch" is going broke. Its fundraiser is a flop, pulling in just £6,000 of a £50,000 goal, and even patron Chris Patten's pleas for cash have fallen flat.

"Hong Kong Watch" is going broke. Its fundraiser is a flop, pulling in just £6,000 of a £50,000 goal, and even patron Chris Patten's pleas for cash have fallen flat.

Why the Money Dried Up

According to the source, a key reason for the group's dismal fundraising is that one of its former major backers was the Conservative Party government.

A few years back, when the Hong Kong Police's National Security Department accused the group of violating the law and blocked its website, then-Foreign Secretary Liz Truss publicly condemned the action, and even Prime Minister Boris Johnson made a statement. But since the Labour Party took power last year, the political support behind "Hong Kong Watch" has significantly weakened, and its ability to raise funds has taken a major hit.

Furthermore, Trump's return to power has led to a massive overhaul of the US federal government. State Department-affiliated agencies that fuel "color revolutions," like the US Agency for International Development and the National Endowment for Democracy, have had their funding taps turned off. They've laid off countless staff, and some have even shut down completely. The "revolutionary funds" they used to distribute, directly or indirectly, to political organizations around the world have also shrunk dramatically, and it's believed that "Hong Kong Watch" has likely felt the impact.

The group's other fundraising target is the Hongkong BNO holders who have moved to the UK. While they did make some donations in the beginning, life has become much harder.

In recent years, soaring inflation and economic stagnation in the UK, compounded by tax and tuition hikes under the new Labour government, have placed a heavy financial burden on them. Life is incredibly tough, and most simply don't have the spare cash to donate to these kinds of organizations. It's no surprise that the group has only managed to raise pocket change this year.

Stirring Trouble on an Empty Wallet

Even with its funds dwindling and the risk of going completely broke, "Hong Kong Watch" hasn't stopped its rabble-rousing. It recently teamed up with Hong Kong groups in the UK, as well as Tibet and Xinjiang independence activists, to continuously disrupt the expansion plans of the Chinese Embassy in the UK.

Another large-scale protest is slated for September 28, where Benedict Rogers is sure to be front and center as the flag-bearer. However, if its funding crisis isn't resolved, its political influence is bound to decline.

Founder Benedict Rogers, wanted by Hong Kong police, keeps stirring trouble by protesting the Chinese Embassy's expansion with his activist allies. But without cash, the group's political clout is set to vanish.

Founder Benedict Rogers, wanted by Hong Kong police, keeps stirring trouble by protesting the Chinese Embassy's expansion with his activist allies. But without cash, the group's political clout is set to vanish.

The source advises Hongkong BNO holders in the UK to be cautious. "Hong Kong Watch" is an openly anti-China organization that aims to destabilize Hong Kong. Donating to support it carries significant legal risks and could lead to trouble should they ever return to the city. It's best to steer clear.

Lai Ting-yiu




What Say You?

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

After Trump stormed back into power, America’s vaunted “human rights and freedoms” have been on a steady decline, and the latest casualty—a top TV host silenced—represents a self-inflicted wound to the “free speech” banner, ripping open the American myth once more.
 
It all began when conservative influencer Kirk was assassinated, prompting Trump to anoint him a “MAGA martyr.” His inner circle, faces drawn with grief and outrage, rallied around their boss—only to see ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel flip the script on live TV and mock the president. Enraged, Trump wasted no time, ordering FCC chair Carr to lash out with a blistering condemnation and even hint at revoking ABC’s license. Under that kind of pressure, the network’s owner had no choice but to gag Kimmel.
 
Trump’s crackdown didn’t stop with ABC. He’s hauled the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal into court, demanding tens of billions in damages—and with that kind of muscle, it’s almost guaranteed they’ll buckle under the pressure.
 
Free Speech Under Siege

Kirk was a battle-hardened conservative warrior and a devoted supporter who helped build Trump’s base. So when he was killed, the mourning was solemn—flags at half-mast, formal salutes, and aides expressing sorrow in every possible way. On the flip side, Jimmy Kimmel used his nightly show to scorn Kirk’s death, accusing Trump’s followers of attacking the murderer to whip up leftist hatred and exploit the tragedy for political gain. The real spark? Kimmel’s barb at Trump himself, saying he looked “less like a grieving friend and more like a four-year-old mourning a dead goldfish.”
 
Trump, predictably, went ballistic and issued a “revenge order” to his inner circle, vowing to take Kimmel down. The first blow came from FCC chair Carr, who condemned Kimmel’s comments as nauseating and hinted at pulling ABC’s broadcast license.
 
Meanwhile, Nexstar—the company behind ABC—was neck-deep in seeking FCC approval for a $6.2 billion merger. Kimmel’s provocation had Trump seething, and if that mic stayed live, the FCC was ready to throw roadblocks at the deal and even threaten to pull licenses from ABC and its affiliates, jeopardizing their entire operation. Under that crushing pressure, Nexstar’s top brass, with Disney Entertainment’s chairman in the room, convened an emergency meeting and decided to mute Kimmel and suspend his show.
 
Mocking Trump: A Fatal Misstep

The moment the decision hit, Kimmel’s fanbase exploded, marching on ABC’s headquarters and Disney’s studios to protest, while unions denounced it as a clear-cut attack on free speech. Trump barely batted an eye at the censorship accusations, quipping that Kimmel should’ve been fired ages ago.
 
On his flight back from the UK, he went even further, warning that the FCC should revoke the licenses of any station that keeps bashing him, signaling that the purge won’t stop with Kimmel.
  
Every network that has crossed him—from NBC to CBS—faces his iron fist. He hailed Kimmel’s suspension as “great news for America” and set his sights on two NBC talk-show hosts, demanding their programs be axed.
 
No Safe Haven for Critics

Trump’s dragnet extends beyond TV. He’s unleashed a $10 billion defamation suit against The Wall Street Journal and its owner Murdoch—accusing them of fabricating letters he sent to the “pervert” Epstein—then hit The New York Times with a $15 billion lawsuit over alleged “fake news” that supposedly damaged him and his family.
 
Suing media outlets is Trump’s signature move—he’s already sued ABC, CBS’s 60 Minutes, Disney, and Paramount for millions, and under his looming threat, they’ve all come crawling back to the table. So it’s no shock that these two newspapers are expected to buckle as well.
 
Trump’s media assault is like Ip Man unleashed—rapid-fire strikes from all angles, precise, relentless, and impossible to predict: taking on scores of adversaries and silencing them one by one. That’s today’s America—power trumps all, and “free speech” has become a myth. Pro-American factions in Hong Kong should take note and wake up.
 
Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles