Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

BNO Dream for Sale? A Fugitive’s £4 Billion Pitch to a Broke Britain

Blog

BNO Dream for Sale? A Fugitive’s £4 Billion Pitch to a Broke Britain
Blog

Blog

BNO Dream for Sale? A Fugitive’s £4 Billion Pitch to a Broke Britain

2025-09-30 17:14 Last Updated At:17:14

Hong Kong people who relocated to the UK recently had a major scare when the Reform UK party proposed scrapping "permanent residency." It felt like being on a train and suddenly hearing the final station was cancelled, leaving their dream of settling in the UK shattered. Although party leader Nigel Farage later walked it back, clarifying BNO visa holders wouldn't be affected, the future of "permanent residency" remains shaky.
 
Now, a "yellow-camp" think tank has switched gears, dropping the moral arguments and instead "talking money." They claim that if the UK grants BNO holders permanent residency, Britain could rake in £4 billion (around HK$40 billion) in capital by 2029—a very shiny object to dangle in front of a struggling government.

A quick look reveals this think tank was set up by the wanted fugitive Dennis Kwok, with its advisory committee featuring other wanted figures like Kevin Yam and Joseph Lian. The agenda here isn't subtle. But whether a UK government already buckling under immense anti-immigration pressure will fall for this bait is another question entirely.
 
The Moral Card Has Expired

Until now, organizations lobbying for Hong Kong migrants in the UK have all sung the same tune, demanding the Labour government preserve the "5+1" pathway to permanent residency by playing the "moral responsibility" card. Despite the high-minded rhetoric, the government has turned a deaf ear. Why? Because it's caught in a pincer movement: politically, the anti-immigration wave is cresting, and economically, the government is practically bankrupt.
 
As the old saying goes, poverty dulls ambition; moral obligations are a luxury it can no longer afford.
 
The "yellow-camp" think tank, the China Strategic Risks Institute (CSRI), clearly gets it. Talking morals with the UK government is a dead end. So, it's changed its tack, presenting a cold, hard cost-benefit analysis: The nearly 170,000 Hong Kong people in the UK hold over HK$30 billion (about £3 billion) in their Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) accounts. But since the Hong Kong government doesn't recognize the BNO visa as a basis for permanent departure, they can't legally touch that money.

Fugitive Dennis Kwok's 'think tank' dangles a HK$40 billion carrot. But will a cash-strapped UK bite, or is it just a desperate ploy?

Fugitive Dennis Kwok's 'think tank' dangles a HK$40 billion carrot. But will a cash-strapped UK bite, or is it just a desperate ploy?

The pitch is simple: if the UK government grants them permanent residency, these accounts can be unfrozen. Combine that with other funds, and the total inflow could hit nearly £4 billion by 2029.

The think tank argues that once BNO holders in the UK get their hands on this cash, most of it will be transferred to Britain and plowed into the financial and property markets. For the UK, this represents a huge, tangible benefit that could give its economy a much-needed shot in the arm.

Who's Really Pulling the Strings?

So what’s the political game here? Before we get into that, let's look at what CSRI really is.
 
Records show that former Civic Party lawmaker Dennis Kwok bolted from Hong Kong in November 2020 and fled to Canada (he holds Canadian citizenship). By May 2023, he popped up in London, grandly announcing the launch of the "China Strategic Risks Institute" (CSRI) in the UK Parliament.
 
From day one, it had already declared its focus on the global impact of China's rising "totalitarianism"—its anti-China stance couldn't be more obvious. Its advisory committee includes other wanted individuals like Kevin Yam, now in Australia, and Joseph Lian, a former director of Stand News who is also a fugitive.
 
With a lineup like that, it's pretty clear what their real game is.

Launched in the UK Parliament, Dennis Kwok's outfit has 'anti-China' written all over it. A think tank in name, a political weapon in reality.

Launched in the UK Parliament, Dennis Kwok's outfit has 'anti-China' written all over it. A think tank in name, a political weapon in reality.

Furthermore, CSRI is cozy with the chaos-sowing group "Hong Kong Watch." This organization has been colluding with hawkish British politicians, ostensibly lobbying Parliament for the BNO "5+1" pathway and urging the government to unfreeze the MPF accounts of Hong Kong migrants. But the real goal is to use these migrants to build an anti-China base and pressure the Labour government to abandon its friendly policy towards China.
 
Looking at CSRI’s background, it’s obvious they’re just using the "think tank" label as a cover. In reality, they are an anti-China political organization aiming to destabilize Hong Kong. The political calculations behind their "objective research" are identical to those of "Hong Kong Watch."
 
A Desperate Gamble?

Trading in their moral high ground for a £4 billion business pitch might look clever, but it's far from certain that the government will bite.
 
First, the UK government's top priority is tackling the ferocious anti-immigration wave, which demands stricter, not looser, policies.
 
That £4 billion is merely a drop in the ocean, and a distant one at that. It won't solve the immediate crisis. To solve its current problems, Britain needs to improve economic and trade relations with China. It's not about to do anything that might antagonize Beijing at this critical stage.
 
This means the long, anxious wait for Hong Kong BNO holders in the UK will drag on, with their future still very much up in the air.

Lai Ting-yiu




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Grief remains raw a week after the "once‑in‑a‑century" Wang Fuk Court inferno. But while locals pray, overseas agitators plot. They are cynically hijacking the tragedy to rebrand their stalled anti-embassy campaign as a "mourning event."

Think of it as a "triplet" strategy: by bundling the vigil with BNO residency demands, these agitators aim to pump up turnout and force London’s hand. It is a desperate bid to build clout that risks channeling discontent right back to Hong Kong—and authorities need to be watching.

Calculated Pivot: UK agitators hijack the fire tragedy to pump life into their flagging anti-embassy march.

Calculated Pivot: UK agitators hijack the fire tragedy to pump life into their flagging anti-embassy march.

Opportunists Hijack Tragedy for Politics

Make no mistake: the overseas "yellow camp" is going all-out. Major player Hong Kong Watch has issued marching orders to so-called "Hong Kong Community Centres" in Los Angeles, Toronto, and Berlin. Don't let the neutral "community center" branding fool you. These are operational bases for hardline opposition supporters.

Saturday's Toronto event exposes the political underbelly. Alongside the usual protest regulars, you have heavy hitters like Hong Kong Watch Canada chair Aileen Calverley. The theme—"pursuing accountability"—screams politics, not prayer. Expect to see former entertainer Joseph Tay, who fled to Canada in 2020 and now sits on a National Security wanted list.

But the main event is in Britain. The group "Hongkongers in Britain" is staging a massive "memorial" in London, expecting hundreds. The ringleader is Simon Cheng, a former employee of the British consulate with a murky past who secured swift asylum in 2020. Now a fugitive on the police wanted list, he is mixing mourning with his separatist agenda.

Fugitive on the Attack: Simon Cheng weaponizes tomorrow's memorial to strike at the Hong Kong government.

Fugitive on the Attack: Simon Cheng weaponizes tomorrow's memorial to strike at the Hong Kong government.

Friday is just the warm-up act. The real play comes Saturday, when various BNO holder groups converge for a "large march." The mourning angle? That was a last-minute add-on. Their original, stated goals were purely political: protecting BNO settlement perks and killing China’s "super embassy" plan in London.

Shifting goalposts is their only constant. Previous marches relied on a motley crew of anti-China politicians and separatists to sour UK-China relations. But here is the cold reality: British intelligence greenlit the embassy, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer looks ready to approve it. With the opposition campaign hitting a dead end, turnout is nose-diving.

To arrest the decline, organizers are tapping into anxiety among Hong Kong BNO holders about tougher residency rules. By adding a "no change to settlement conditions" demand, they hope to drag more bodies into the street and pad their shrinking numbers.

Fading Relevance Desperate for Numbers

Then came the fire. It was a "once-in-a-century" disaster, and these groups wasted no time weaponizing the grief. By co-opting the tragedy, they aim to lure in regular Hong Kong people who just want to mourn, oblivious to the hardline agenda. It makes their "triplet" protest look far bigger than it actually is.

The playbook is predictable. Once the crowd gathers to mourn, organizers will pour political fuel on the fire, steering the anger toward the HKSAR Government. The goal is simple: export this manufactured outrage back to Hong Kong, triggering "brothers-in-arms" to reignite the ashes of the 2019 turmoil.

This isn't the first time they have built a platform on tragedy. It won't be the last. Authorities need to keep their eyes wide open.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles