Trump's War on Foreign Students Is a Gift to Hong Kong

You'd think Donald Trump is a genius, always looking for ways to give the US an edge. But the reality is, many of his policies—both at home and abroad—have ended up being a massive boost for China. That's why he's earned the nickname "川建國" (Chuan Jianguo), or "Trump Builds China." And now, it seems Hong Kong is also cashing in on his moves, making "川建港" (Chuan Jiangang), or "Trump Builds Hong Kong," just as fitting.
 
His latest stunt? A crude crackdown on foreign students that has sent shockwaves through US universities. Fall enrollment has plummeted, with the number of Chinese students dropping by 12%. This has choked off a vital revenue stream for many institutions, forcing them to slash salaries and staff just to stay afloat.
 
Meanwhile, Hong Kong is doing the exact opposite. By throwing its doors wide open, it's attracting students from the mainland and beyond who are now thinking twice about the US. This isn't just a win for the universities' bank accounts; it's a shot in the arm for the entire economy. So, yes, we really have "Chuan Jiangang" to thank for this unexpected windfall.

Thanks, Trump: As the US slams its doors, mainland students are flocking to Hong Kong.

A Campaign of Control

Right after taking office, Trump launched an iron-fisted campaign to whip everyone into line, from the government and military to intelligence agencies and the judiciary. Universities quickly became a prime target.
 
After a drawn-out battle to bring Harvard to heel, he issued a memorandum last week called the "Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education" to nine top universities, including MIT.
 
The deal? Follow the government's "ideological guidelines" to control student thought and cap foreign undergraduate enrollment at 15%. In return, universities get to keep their federal funding and research grants—a blatant case of using cash to buy compliance.
 
Even before this 15% cap, US media reported that Trump was already using every trick in the book to keep foreign students out. We're talking delayed visas, restricted visa numbers, and intense scrutiny of applicants. Add to that the government's move to expel students who participated in protests, and it's no surprise that many who had their sights set on the US are now looking elsewhere.
 
The Numbers Don't Lie

The latest data from the U.S. International Trade Administration (ITA) paints a grim picture. August is usually the peak season for foreign students arriving in the US, but this year, only 313,000 entered on visas—a staggering 19% drop from last year. Asian students, who have long been the majority, saw the steepest decline of 24%, falling to just 191,000. Within that group, the number of Indian students plummeted by 44%, and Chinese students were down 12%.
 
For many American universities, international students are a financial lifeline. This sharp decline in enrollment has hit them hard and fast, plunging them into a financial crisis. Reuters spoke to 10 universities, and every single one reported a drop in foreign students, with one seeing a 19% decrease. With tuition income drying up, some schools have been forced to make drastic cuts just to survive.
 
Take DePaul University in Chicago, a private institution that saw 755 fewer foreign students this year, a 30% reduction. Facing a deficit, it had to slash spending, cut executive pay, lay off staff, and freeze hiring. It's a story playing out across the country. At least 35 institutions have had to lower their budgets, and the University of Southern California has cut 630 positions. It's a scene of widespread misery.
 
America's Loss, Hong Kong's Gain

Trump has his own twisted logic for this "expulsion" policy. He thinks that by reducing the number of foreign students, he's creating more spaces for America's own "excellent students," completely ignoring the economic fallout.
 
The truth is, foreign students are big business. It's predicted that the 30% to 40% drop in international students this fall will result in a $7 billion economic loss and 60,000 fewer jobs. And that doesn't even touch on the decline in foreign graduate students, which will cripple research in many fields and ultimately weaken America's economic strength.
 
While US universities are left high and dry by Trump, Hong Kong is reaping the rewards. In recent years, the Hong Kong government has gone in the opposite direction, boosting the proportion of non-local students in government-funded universities to 40% in the 2024-25 academic year, with 26,600 students currently enrolled. Next year, that figure will rise to 50%, opening the floodgates.
 
Friends in the education sector tell me that some mainland students, spooked by Trump's harsh policies, have scrapped their plans to study in the US and are coming to Hong Kong instead. As a result, applications from non-local students are surging at all universities. HKUST and PolyU each received over 20,000 applications, and even a private institution like Hang Seng University saw over 10,000. Once the university town in the Northern Metropolis is complete, the number of non-local students is set to skyrocket.

The Trump Effect: US universities face financial ruin as foreign students flee his crude "expulsion" tactics.

A Bright Future for Hong Kong

The more the US tightens its grip, the more Hong Kong's education industry thrives, and the economic benefits are already clear. A UBS report out today predicts that between 2029 and 2030, the number of non-local university students will hit 140,000. To tackle the housing shortage, the government is encouraging hotels to convert into student dorms, which is great news for hotel operators. The sustained demand for private rentals will also give the property market a healthy boost.
 
While US universities are being wrecked by Trump, shrouded in gloom, Hong Kong's institutions are looking at a bright future. For that, we really have to say a big thank you to "Chuan Jiangang."
  
Lai Ting-yiu

What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

As the Year of the Horse approaching, Hong Kong BNO holders in the UK are bracing for a gut punch. The festive season brings no joy—only anxiety. Mid-February marks the deadline for the UK government's consultation on raising permanent residency thresholds, and the verdict on whether BNO holders get a pass is about to drop.

The Home Office floated immigration reforms that would keep the "5+1" rule intact—five years of residence before you can apply—but the bar just shot up, with higher English proficiency requirements and stable income. For many, these hurdles are insurmountable.

Mahmood's stonewalling to BNO holders' demands signals bad news. The February verdict looms.

Hong Kong BNO holders fired off "five demands" to the authorities, pleading for relief. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood's response was ice cold. Zero acknowledgment of their demands. Her dismissive tone signals one thing: exemptions for BNO holders look dead in the water.

If the final call goes all the way, thousands who waited five years will crash at the finish line. A return wave to Hong Kong is inevitable. The Hong Kong government needs to get ready.

The Dual Knockout Blow

The UK government didn't just raise the bar—it installed a double gate that slams shut on 60,000 people. First gate: English proficiency must hit B2 level, equivalent to A-Level, practically university standard. Second gate: annual income over the past three to five years must reach at least £12,570, with tax records to prove it.

Surveys by Hong Kong migrant organizations paint a grim picture: if these "dual requirements" become reality, 30% of BNO holders—roughly 60,000 people—will fail to qualify and get filtered out. No wonder panic is spreading.

While anxiety mounts, the UK government plays coy. Ambiguous statements. Equivocal attitudes. Nobody can read their hand. Now, with just one month until the announcement, BNO holders are reaching peak agitation. A group of Hong Kong voters in Mahmood's constituency drafted a joint letter, restating the "five demands" and requesting a face-to-face meeting to apply pressure.

Mahmood responded quickly—but only to say Hong Kong BNO holders could apply for permanent residency after five years. As for the "five demands"? Crickets. Instead, she reiterated that those granted permanent residency must meet three criteria: being "well-integrated," "economically self-sufficient," and "committed” to the communities they join.

Mahmood Goes Silent

One Hong Kong BNO holder who signed the petition decoded those three phrases: "integration" and "commitment" are code words for English proficiency and income levels. Translation: BNO holders applying for permanent residency must also clear these two hurdles.

These Hong Kong residents sent a follow-up letter to Mahmood, requesting a meeting to present their case in person. Her response? Radio silence. Phone calls to her constituency office go unanswered. She's clearly ducking any face-to-face encounter.

Mahmood is stonewalling, and nobody can do a thing about it. Frustrated BNO holders vent to yellow media outlets, angrily branding her "heartless." But here's the reality check: the Labour government's approval ratings are tanking. Reform UK is breathing down their necks on immigration. Immigration policy will err on the side of restriction, not relaxation. Naturally, they're inclined to treat BNO holders the same as everyone else. No special treatment. No "sentiment." The "five demands" might as well be whispers in the wind.

Two Paths Forward

Friends living in the UK lay out the scenario: if the UK government announces "no relaxation" next month, BNO holders who can't meet the requirements face two choices.

First option: return to Hong Kong and start over. After all, life in the UK hasn't been entirely rosy—living day after day in anxiety. "Returning home" might actually be a relief.

Second option: continue to "temporarily reside" in the UK on a BNO visa, becoming long-term temporary residents. But they'll remain in an unstable state, which won't be comfortable.

There's also a thornier complication: some BNO families migrated to the UK with their parents, and one spouse hasn't worked or earned any income for several years. If these family members don't meet the criteria for applying for permanent residency, it could trigger family separation or force the entire family to return to Hong Kong. They'll face an agonizing decision. Quite a mess.

No exemptions? Brace for the return wave.

My friend predicts that if the worst-case scenario materializes, a return wave is sure to come. For Hong Kong, there will be upsides and downsides. Either way, the government needs to get ready and figure out how to handle it.