BNO Homeowners Ambushed—Britain’s New Tax Lands Like a One-Two Punch

Get ready for weeks of seismic news. Britain’s BNO Hong Kong people, especially those holding property, are about to feel the aftershocks.

First, the government’s long-awaited consultation paper on permanent residency is dropping within days. Is the “5+1” timeline about to morph into “10+1”? We’ll soon know. But that’s just warm-up for November 26—when Rachel Reeves, Chancellor of the Exchequer, unveils her budget. Rumor has it Reeves is targeting mid- to high-end homeowners—including plenty of BNO Hong Kong property buyers—with a so-called mansion tax. The catch? Even before Reeves makes it official, headlines alone have sent property prices sliding, walloping owners with double trouble: sinking home values and a looming tax hit.

Rachel Reeves targets upscale homes—BNO Hong Kong owners take a double hit.

Labour inherits a fiscal nightmare—and Rachel Reeves is the first to admit it. The new team moves in, only to find a £25 billion sinkhole left by the previous  administration. Two crises are front and center. First, immigration and asylum numbers explode, with new arrivals flooding in and almost no one leaving. That gridlock sets the stage for this week’s permanent residency proposal. Second, a gaping public finance deficit. Reeves, the Chancellor, is under crushing pressure to wring every last pound from the system.

Rachel Reeves wasn’t afraid to play hardball. Her first instinct as Chancellor was to jack up income taxes across the board. But that plan crashed and burned—fury from the working public saw to that fast. Political suicide, plain and simple.

So, Reeves pivoted. Next on her list: Britain’s property-owning elite. Her showpiece? A proposed surcharge—the so-called “mansion tax.” The catch: it’s no longer just the rich in the firing line. If this tax sticks, the government expects a £600 million windfall.

Here’s how Reeves plans to fill the state’s empty coffers: a sweeping reassessment of 2.4 million pricey English homes, hitting London and the Southeast hardest. Of those, 300,000 homeowners—no small number—will fork out thousands more on top of their regular council tax, year after year.

New Tax, Old Wounds Getting Deeper

“Mansion Tax.” Sounds fancy, right? Not exactly. The scheme actually targets three council tax bands—F, G, and H. That’s right: middle-class F-band homes are squarely in the crosshairs. About 1.3 million households, many BNO Hong Kong people among them, get caught up.

London’s middle class braces as 300,000 homes face the tax axe.

Right now, these families are shelling out an average £3,293 in council tax every year. Now, they’ll have to cough up thousands more on top. The reaction was swift—Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride blasted the move as “a class war against Middle England”.

Most recent migrants from Hong Kong aren’t tycoons. They sold homes in Hong Kong, moved the proceeds, bought property in Britain, and work for decent money. Turns out, they’re exactly the kind of “middle class” this government wants to squeeze dry.

Prices Sink Before the Storm

No surprise: leaks alone have already dunked mid- and high-end home prices. Real estate agents say that in Central London, homes listed at £2 million and up have dropped by about 4%. Sellers panic, cutting prices; buyers run cold and wait. With the official tax announcement looming, expect prices to take another nasty tumble.

For Hong Kong people holding these properties, losses are already racking up. When the new tax kicks in, it’ll pile even more hurt on top. It’s a double hit: falling home values and rising charges. Only hope left? Maybe the permanent residency paper delivers some good news to numb out the pain.

What Say You?

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

The national security fugitives have made a name for themselves as serial agitators—men who shout “charge!” from afar while hiding safely under foreign protection. From thousands of miles away, they peddle calls for protest votes or boycotts, trying to sabotage Hong Kong’s Legislative Council election. The outcome? A few gullible locals, blindly amplifying these posts, now find themselves in serious legal trouble.

Fugitive Alan Keung called online for blank ballots and boycotts. A few naïve users reposted his incitement and were swiftly arrested by the ICAC—proof that “Blood Bun Demons” tell others to charge while staying safe themselves.

A Long Record of Deceit

Investigators from the Independent Commission Against Corruption ( ICAC ) arrested three locals who reshared social media posts inciting people not to vote or to cast invalid ballots—acts that breach Hong Kong’s Elections (Corrupt and Illegal Conduct) Ordinance. The Commission emphasised its zero-tolerance stance on digital incitement. Sources revealed that the reposted content originated from fugitive Alan Keung, who on October 15, under the name of the illegal group “Hong Kong Parliament,” called for an election boycott while launching wild smears at the poll.
 
Keung’s infamy stretches back to the 2019 unrest. Masquerading as a “pastor,” he incited violence before fleeing to Taiwan to set up a “Hong Kong independence” outfit—so extreme that even Taiwan deported him. He then resurfaced in Canada, still plotting under the same “Hong Kong Parliament” banner. The police’s National Security Department later placed him on its wanted list. Today, he continues his illegal advocacy from abroad, ensnaring naïve sharers who face arrest in his stead. As the local saying goes: “The clever talk, the foolish act.”
 
It’s not just Keung. Another fugitive, Ted Hui Chi-fung, who absconded to Australia, is repeating the same ploy. Earlier, he called publicly for blank ballots and voter abstention. Hong Kong’s Secretary for Security Chris Tang promptly condemned him, warning that circulating such posts may breach electoral law and even the Hong Kong National Security Law if foreign collusion is involved.
 
This isn’t the first time Hong Kong people have paid dearly for parroting fugitives’ rhetoric. Four years ago, after similar boycott calls by Hui and activist Sunny Cheung, four locals rashly reshared their posts—and all were convicted. The legal risks are not theoretical; they are proven and severe.
 

In Australia, Ted Hui continues running the same malicious game. Four years ago, Hong Kong citizens who reshared his boycott posts were prosecuted and convicted.

Masters of Manipulation

Experts say these fugitives thrive by selling chaos to their foreign backers. Instability in Hong Kong becomes their currency; the more they provoke, the more “useful” they appear to overseas patrons. But when their local followers get arrested, imprisoned, or fined, those same fugitives wash their hands clean. That hypocrisy—profiting off others’ suffering—is why they’ve earned the name: “Blood Bun Demons.”
 
In the end, figures like Hui and Keung aren’t crusaders—they’re schemers. Their motives are self-serving, their methods deceitful, and their record plain. Anyone helping to spread their manipulation only harms both themselves and Hong Kong. On December 7, the city deserves unity, not division—so encourage your family and friends to vote together for Hong Kong’s future.