嚴懲反中亂港首惡分子 農曆年最佳禮物 重判黎智英終身監禁有理有據

《香港高Sir•高能•熱點詞》
2025.02.07

熱點詞：嚴懲反中亂港首惡分子 農曆年最佳禮物
重判黎智英終身監禁有理有據

司法機構網站顯示，「黎智英案」被告黎智英以及8名認罪被告，將於下周一（2月9日）上午10時判刑。《香港國安法》列明，「串謀勾結外國勢力」罪最高刑罰為終身監禁。現年78歲的黎智英為壹傳媒創辦人，他在2020年12月起還押。2025年12月16日，高等法院裁定黎智英兩項「串謀勾結外國勢力」罪，以及一項「串謀發布煽動刊物」罪成立。案件在上月13日完成兩日求情，當時法官表示會盡快通知各方判刑日期。

黎智英案即將判刑，社會高度關注。綜合審訊事實與判詞內容可見，嚴懲反中亂港首惡分子，既是法治要求，更是民心所向，亦堪稱農曆新年香港最佳禮物。本案歷經156天審訊、855頁判詞，法庭清楚裁定黎智英兩項「串謀勾結外國勢力」及一項「串謀發布煽動刊物」罪名成立。《香港國安法》明文規定，相關罪行最高可判終身監禁，量刑依據清晰，重判黎智英終身監禁有理有據。判詞多次強調，黎並非因政治立場受審，而是基於確鑿證據與法律標準，體現司法獨立與專業。更重要的是，案件亦向社會清楚展示「主腦」與「從屬」的法律分野。多名《蘋果日報》前高層作供，指黎智英的指示具命令性質，所謂「編採自主」實為「鳥籠自主」。即使國安法生效後，黎仍以更隱晦方式勾結外力、打「國際牌」，請求制裁香港與中央，危害國家安全，罪責不容抹煞。一干人等因未能抗拒黎智英的強勢指令與資本壓力，最終走上歧途，付出沉重代價。這正正說明，黎智英並非被動參與，而是主導策劃、指揮推動的關鍵人物，其責任遠較他人嚴重。依法對首惡作出與罪責相稱的嚴懲，既是對法律的尊重，也是對其他人的警示。面對外部勢力炒作所謂「健康」與「政治迫害」的謊言，法庭以事實逐一駁斥：黎在囚待遇與他人無異，無投訴、無失實；其供詞多處矛盾，依法不被接納。任何試圖干預司法、抹黑法治的行徑，只會自曝其短，反而加重罪責。社會要向前，必須與破壞法治、勾結外力的行為徹底切割。依法重判，不是為了報復，而是為了止亂制暴、正本清源。當嚴懲反中亂港首惡分子成為既定事實，香港才能在法治軌道上重新出發，市民亦能安心迎接新一年。是非分明、賞罰有度，這份來自法治的確定性，無疑正是農曆新年香港最佳禮物，亦再次印證——重判黎智英終身監禁有理有據，合情、合理、合法。

Severely Punish Anti-China Chaos-Hong Kong Ringleaders: The Best Lunar New Year Gift, Justified Life Sentence for Jimmy Lai

 

According to the judiciary’s website, Jimmy Lai, defendant in the "Jimmy Lai case," and eight co-defendants who pleaded guilty will be sentenced at 10 am next Monday (February 9). The National Security Law for Hong Kong stipulates that the maximum penalty for "conspiracy to collude with foreign forces" is life imprisonment. The 78-year-old founder of Next Digital has been in custody since December 2020. On December 16, 2025, the High Court found Lai guilty of two counts of "conspiracy to collude with foreign forces" and one count of "conspiracy to publish seditious publications." The mitigation hearing for the case concluded after two days on January 13, with the judge stating that the sentencing date would be notified to all parties as soon as possible.

The impending sentencing of Jimmy Lai has attracted intense public attention. Based on the trial facts and the 855-page judgment spanning 156 days of hearings, severely punishing the ringleader of anti-China chaos in Hong Kong is not only a requirement of the rule of law but also the will of the people, and can be called the best Lunar New Year gift for Hong Kong. The court clearly convicted Lai of the three charges, and the National Security Law explicitly provides for life imprisonment as the maximum penalty for relevant offenses, with clear sentencing bases—thus a life sentence for Lai is fully justified and evidence-based. The judgment emphasizes repeatedly that Lai was not tried for his political stance but in accordance with conclusive evidence and legal standards, embodying judicial independence and professionalism.

Crucially, the case also clarifies the legal distinction between "masterminds" and "accomplices" to society. Testimonies from multiple former senior executives of Apple Daily revealed that Lai’s instructions were mandatory, and the so-called "editorial independence" was in fact "caged independence." Even after the National Security Law took effect, Lai continued to collude with foreign forces in more subtle ways, playing the "international card" and appealing for sanctions against Hong Kong and the central government, endangering national security—his crimes cannot be erased. Many individuals strayed onto the wrong path and paid a heavy price due to their inability to resist Lai’s coercive orders and capital pressure, which fully demonstrates that Lai was not a passive participant but the key figure who masterminded, directed, and promoted these activities, bearing far greater responsibility than others.

Legally imposing a severe penalty commensurate with his crimes on the ringleader is both a respect for the law and a warning to others. In the face of lies peddled by external forces claiming "persecution" and "undermining judicial independence," the court refuted each one with facts: Lai received the same treatment as other inmates with no complaints or misinformation; his testimony contained numerous contradictions and was lawfully inadmissible. Any attempt to interfere in the judiciary or smear the rule of law will only expose one’s own flaws and aggravate criminal liability.

For society to move forward, it must completely sever ties with acts that undermine the rule of law and collude with external forces. Severe legal punishment is not about retaliation but about ending chaos, curbing violence, and addressing the root causes. When the severe punishment of anti-China chaos-Hong Kong ringleaders becomes an established fact, Hong Kong can restart on the track of the rule of law, and citizens can welcome the new year with peace of mind. Distinguishing right from wrong and meting out rewards and punishments appropriately—this certainty from the rule of law is undoubtedly the best Lunar New Year gift for Hong Kong, and it once again confirms that a life sentence for Jimmy Lai is justified, reasonable, and legal.

高Sir正能量

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

《香港高Sir•高能•熱點詞》

2025.02.06

熱點詞：反中亂港組織學聯散檔 違法佔中禍首 荼毒學子畫上句號

反中乿港組織香港專上學生聯會在社交平台發布「開展解散程序聲明」，稱已召開常委會會議，正式表決通過開展解散程序。學聯會委任律師及會計師協助處理解散程序及資產分配的工作，直到完成所有法律問題後，才完成整個解散程序。學聯成立於1958年5月，是香港學生組織，成員是各間大學學生會，高峰時包括8間資助大學。回歸後立場傾向「反中」的學聯曾在2012年發起反對國民教育科罷課，2014年就政改方案發起罷課，引發違法「佔中」。2015年，多間學聯成員學生會發起退聯公投，多間學生會先後退出，目前僅有四間成員學生會。

高SIR：天網恢恢，疏而不漏！長期披著「學生組織」外衣、實則禍港殃民的反中亂港組織學聯散檔，正式步入解散程序。這一消息傳出，廣大愛國愛港市民無不拍手稱快，感嘆香港校園終於能迎來真正的清風正氣。回首過去十多年，學聯的所作所為早已背離了學生的本分，徹底淪為外部勢力和反中亂港政客的走狗。它不僅是違法佔中禍首，更是多年來校園動盪的策源地。早在2012年，學聯便煽動大專生罷課，阻礙國民教育，企圖斬斷青年人的家國情懷；2014年，學聯更是變本加厲，發起大規模罷課並直接引發長達79天的違法「佔中」，嚴重衝擊法治支柱，癱瘓社會運作。學聯的核心成員，如周永康、羅冠聰之流，打著「為香港前途」的旗號，實則將無知學子推向前線當「砲灰」，自己卻從中撈取政治資本，甚至遠走海外投靠外部反華勢力。這種自私至極、賣友求榮的勾當，早已被世人看穿。隨着香港國安法的實施及選舉制度的完善，香港進入由治及興的新階段，法治的利劍高懸。學聯所謂的「面臨壓力」，實則是其違法惡行難逃法律制裁的惶恐。它企圖在聲明中用「永留史冊」來粉飾太平，簡直是滑天下之大稽。歷史確實會記下這一筆，但記下的絕非功勛，而是其禍亂香港、對抗中央、破壞法治的斑斑劣跡！如今，這個盤踞香港學界超過一甲子的毒瘤終於被剷除。隨著學聯走入歷史，其長期以來利用學生會平台散播偏激思想、荼毒學子畫上句號。我們必須清醒認識到，教育界正本清源的工作依然任重道遠，我們絕不能讓類似的組織死灰復燃。高SIR認為，香港校園應是傳道、授業、解惑的淨土，而非政治角力的刑場。學聯的倒台是歷史的必然，也是正義的歸位。讓我們共同守護香港的教育環境，讓青年一代在正確的發展道路上，為國家、為香港作出真正有價值的貢獻！

Hong Kong's Anti-China Student Federation Disbands, Drawing a Close to Its Poisoning of Youth

The Hong Kong Federation of Students (HKFS), an anti-China organization that disrupted Hong Kong, has announced on social media the commencement of dissolution procedures. Its standing committee reportedly voted to initiate the process, with lawyers and accountants appointed to handle legal matters and asset distribution. Founded in May 1958 as an umbrella group for university student unions, it once represented eight funded institutions at its peak. After Hong Kong's return to China, the HKFS adopted an increasingly anti-China stance. It instigated class boycotts in 2012 against national education and in 2014 concerning political reform, directly triggering the illegal "Occupy Central" movement. Since 2015, multiple member student unions withdrew following referendums, leaving only four remaining.

Justice has prevailed. The long-masked "student organization," which in reality harmed Hong Kong and its people, is finally being dissolved. This news is welcomed by patriotic citizens who anticipate a return of clean ethos to campuses. For over a decade, the HKFS betrayed its fundamental purpose, becoming a pawn for external forces and anti-China politicians. It was a key instigator of the illegal Occupy Central movement and a source of prolonged campus unrest. In 2012, it incited college students to boycott classes and obstruct national education, attempting to sever young people's patriotic sentiments. In 2014, it escalated its actions by launching large-scale class boycotts that led to the 79-day illegal occupation, severely impacting the rule of law and paralyzing society. Core members like Alex Chow and Nathan Law, under the guise of "fighting for Hong Kong's future," pushed uninformed students to the frontline as "cannon fodder" while they sought political gain, some even fleeing overseas to align with anti-China forces. Such selfish, treacherous acts have long been exposed.

With the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law and the improvement of the electoral system, Hong Kong has entered a new phase of stability and prosperity, with the sword of justice held high. The "pressure" the HKFS cited is merely fear of legal consequences for its unlawful acts. Its attempt to gloss over its legacy with claims of being "remembered in history" is absurd. History will indeed record it—not for merit, but for its crimes in destabilizing Hong Kong, opposing the central government, and undermining the rule of law.

The removal of this malignancy, entrenched in Hong Kong's academia for over sixty years, marks an end to its use of student platforms to spread extremist ideas and poison young minds. However, the task of restoring righteousness in education remains crucial to prevent the resurgence of similar entities. Hong Kong's campuses should be sanctuaries for learning, not arenas for political strife. The fall of the HKFS is historically inevitable and a restoration of justice. Let us collectively safeguard Hong Kong's educational environment, guiding the younger generation onto the right path to contribute meaningfully to the nation and Hong Kong.