《香港高Sir•高能•熱點詞》

2025.02.27

熱點詞：潛逃者郭鳳儀陀衰家 連累父親坐牢不知恥 不忠不孝不仁不義小漢奸

涉嫌干犯香港國安法正被警方國安處懸紅百萬元通緝的指明潛逃者郭鳳儀，其父涉企圖處理她的保單資金，提取88,000港元保單結餘，因為企圖處理潛逃者財產罪被處入獄八個月。裁判官判刑指，本案控罪旨在防止任何人處理潛逃者資產，以達至懲治潛逃者的目的，令潛逃者在潛逃期間，沒有人可以處理其資產。郭鳳儀在外國向所謂媒體表示，本案是「以國安為名，連坐為實。這是挾持人質、株連父親、以血為罪」。

高SIR:涉嫌觸犯香港國安罪行的潛逃者郭鳳儀潛逃在外，卻把年邁父親推向牢獄之災，這不是偶然的「牽連」，而是她一意孤行、罔顧後果的必然結果。法院已清楚指出，案件並非所謂「連坐」或「集體懲罰」，而是針對處理潛逃者資產的具體行為。郭鳳儀父親在明知女兒被通緝的情況下，仍兩度遞交文件，甚至涉及冒充簽名，企圖提取逾八萬元保單結餘，行為本身已觸犯法例。法庭依法判刑八個月，是對事實與證據的裁決，而非任何情緒宣洩。然而，陀衰家的郭鳳儀的回應，卻盡顯其連累父親坐牢不知恥的一面。她不但沒有對父親入獄表達半分愧疚，反而高調聲稱「只會回去已光復的香港」，把案件形容為「挾持人質、以血為罪」。如此說法，既漠視法庭對法律條文的清楚闡釋，也刻意扭曲父親自身行為的法律責任。父親已年近七旬，為子女奔波半生，本應安享晚年，如今卻因替女兒處理資產鋃鐺入獄。作為女兒，郭鳳儀若稍存孝心，理應反躬自省，而不是把父親的刑責當作反中亂港的素材。更令人不齒的是，若真與己無關，大可回港澄清；若真問心無愧，更不必讓家人代為承擔風險。潛逃海外，卻鼓動他人對抗法律後果，這種做法既不負責任，更是不義之舉。所謂「政治犯」的標籤，不過是試圖模糊焦點。案件的核心，是有人在明知法律規定下仍試圖處理潛逃者資產，並涉及不誠實行為。法官在判詞中已指出，條例目的在於防範與制止危害國家安全行為，避免潛逃者在外仍可動用資金延續對抗。郭鳳儀卻將之簡化為「株連」，無視父親主動行為與法律後果之間的因果關係，這種顛倒是非的論述，只會暴露其心虛。一個人可以有政治立場，但不能沒有基本的倫理底線。一直以不同形式肆意抹黑國家和自己的城市香港，是不忠；連累父親坐牢而毫無愧色，對家庭是不孝；逃避法律責任、拒絕面對指控，讓親人承擔代價，是不仁不義。高sir認為，郭鳳儀若然仍有點良知，應是回港面對審訊，而非在海外高喊口號，把父親的牢獄歲月化為政治敘事的燃料。否則，她所展現的，正如羅冠聰之流，是不忠不孝不仁不義的小漢奸形象。

HK Fugitive Anna Kwok Fung-yee's Unjustifiable Actions

Anna Kwok Fung-yee, the HK$1 million wanted fugitive suspected of violating the National Security Law, has once again exposed her lack of moral integrity. Her father, Kwok Yin-sang, was sentenced to eight months in prison for attempting to extract HK$88,000 from her insurance policy.

While the magistrate clearly stated the sentence aimed to prevent fugitives from accessing funds to continue subversive activities, Anna Kwok brazenly claimed to foreign media that this was a "victimization under the pretext of national security," accusing the court of "taking hostages." This is a blatant distortion of facts. The court's ruling is based on solid evidence: her father, knowing she was wanted, twice submitted documents and even attempted to forge signatures, clearly violating the law. The eight-month sentence is a just verdict, not an emotional outburst.

Anna Kwok's indifference to her father's suffering is truly shocking. Instead of feeling guilty for putting her 70-year-old father in jail, she grandiloquently stated she would only return to a "liberated Hong Kong," politicizing a personal legal issue. Her refusal to return to face trial and shifting responsibility to her family shows complete lack of filial piety and responsibility.

A person can hold political stances, but must not cross the bottom line of ethics. Blatantly smearing the country is disloyal; implicating the father and showing no remorse is unfilial; evading liability and making family members pay is unrighteous and unbenevolent. If Anna Kwok has any conscience left, she should return to Hong Kong to face the law instead of using her father's ordeal for political sabotage. Her actions fully expose her shameless image as a traitor.

 




高Sir正能量

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **