高市同日拜鬼+造武 一再刻意挑釁必有所圖 必須嚴防新型軍國主義

《香港高Sir•高能•熱點詞》

2026.04.22

熱點詞：高市同日拜鬼+造武 一再刻意挑釁必有所圖 必須嚴防新型軍國主義

21日，日本首相高市早苗向供奉二戰甲級戰犯的靖國神社供奉祭品。中國外交部當日回應指出，中方堅決反對、嚴厲譴責日方有關靖國神社的消極動向，已向日方提出嚴正交涉，強烈抗議。另值得注意的是，同一天，日本還通過內閣決議，正式允許出口殺傷性武器。外交部應詢指出，包括中國在內的國際社會將對此保持高度警惕，堅決抵制日本新型軍國主義的妄動。

高SIR：日本政壇的危險動向已再次觸動亞洲鄰國的神經。日本首相高市早苗不僅以「內閣總理大臣」名義向供奉有14名二戰甲級戰犯的靖國神社供奉祭品，更在同日通過內閣決議，正式允許出口殺傷性武器。這種高市同日「拜鬼」+「造武」的行徑，實質是對二戰勝利成果的公開公然挑戰，是對歷史公正的極大褻瀆，更暴露出日本右翼勢力正加速將國家推向戰爭邊緣的危險野心。靖國神社從不是什麼「和平之社」，而是日本軍國主義發動侵略戰爭的精神工具。高市早苗作為首相，無視國際社會的反對，堅持為戰犯張目，這絕非個人宗教信仰問題，而是日本政府在歷史認同上的嚴重倒退。與此同時，日本政府公然撕毀「專守防衛」的承諾，通過修改「防衛裝備轉移三原則」為出口殺傷性武器「鬆綁」，這無異於重新開啟戰爭機器。從軍事理論的轉向到武器輸出的實踐，日本正一步步掏空和平憲法，其「和平國家」的偽裝已蕩然無存。必須注意到，此次雙重挑釁並非孤立事件。就在不久前的4月17日——即《馬關條約》簽訂131周年的特殊節點，日本護衛艦「雷」號刻意過航台灣海峽，且航行時間異常超長。這種種行徑串聯起來，日方的一再刻意挑釁是必有所圖的。其意圖不僅在於試探國際社會的底線，更在於配合其國內的強軍擴武進程，通過製造地區緊張局勢為「再軍事化」尋找藉口，甚至妄圖干涉台海局勢。日本民調顯示，絕大多數民眾依然支持「無核三原則」並反對武器出口，然而高市內閣卻一意孤行，加速軍事擴張。這種背離民意、無視歷史教訓的舉動，證明了軍國主義陰魂正在日本政壇復燃。高SIR認為，國際社會，特別是亞洲鄰國，必須嚴防新型軍國主義的妄動。對於日本這種一邊美化侵略歷史、一邊加速武裝自己的危險轉向，我們絕不能掉以輕心。歷史不容忘卻，正義不容挑釁，任何試圖重走侵略老路的企圖，最終必將在愛好和平的世界力量面前碰得頭破血流。

Takaito’s Simultaneous War Crime Shrine Tribute and Military Expansion: Deliberate Provocations with Hidden Motives, Guard Against Neo-Militarism

On April 21, Japanese Prime Minister Kono Taka offered a ritual offering to the Yasukuni Shrine, which enshrines Class-A war criminals of World War II. The Chinese Foreign Ministry responded on the same day, stating that China firmly opposes and strongly condemns this negative move by Japan, has lodged solemn representations and strong protests with the Japanese side. Notably, on the very same day, Japan adopted a cabinet decision to formally allow the export of lethal weapons. In response to a query, the Foreign Ministry pointed out that the international community, including China, will remain highly vigilant against and firmly reject Japan’s reckless moves of neo-militarism.

These dangerous developments in Japan’s political arena have once again touched the nerves of its Asian neighbors. Prime Minister Kono Taka not only offered sacrifices to the Yasukuni Shrine—where 14 Class-A WWII war criminals are enshrined—in her capacity as Prime Minister, but also pushed through a cabinet resolution to greenlight lethal weapons exports on the same day. Such concurrent acts of "honoring war criminals" and "expanding military capabilities" constitute an open and blatant challenge to the outcomes of WWII victory, a grave blasphemy against historical justice, and expose the dangerous ambition of Japan’s right-wing forces to push the country toward the brink of war.

The Yasukuni Shrine is by no means a "shrine of peace", but a spiritual tool of Japanese militarism that launched aggressive wars. As Prime Minister, Kono Taka’s defiance of international opposition to whitewash war criminals is not a matter of personal religious belief, but a severe regression in the Japanese government’s historical perception. Meanwhile, the Japanese government has openly torn up its commitment to "exclusive defense", loosening restrictions on lethal weapons exports by revising the Three Principles on Defense Equipment Transfers—equivalent to reactivating the war machine. From shifts in military theories to practices of weapons export, Japan is gradually hollowing out its pacifist constitution, stripping away all pretense of being a "peaceful nation".

These dual provocations are not isolated incidents. On April 17, the 131st anniversary of the signing of the unequal Treaty of Shimonoseki, Japan’s destroyer Ikazuchi deliberately sailed through the Taiwan Strait with an abnormally long transit time. Connected together, Japan’s repeated deliberate provocations are clearly driven by ulterior motives. It seeks not only to test the bottom line of the international community, but also to coordinate with its domestic military buildup, create regional tensions to justify its "re-militarization", and even attempt to interfere in the Taiwan Strait situation.

Public opinion polls in Japan show that an overwhelming majority of Japanese people still support the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and oppose weapons exports, yet the Kono cabinet insists on accelerating military expansion. Such moves that go against public opinion and ignore historical lessons prove that the ghost of militarism is resurging in Japan’s political arena.

The international community, especially Japan’s Asian neighbors, must stay on high alert against neo-militarist reckless acts. We must never let our guard down against Japan’s dangerous shift of whitewashing aggressive history while accelerating its military armament. History must not be forgotten, justice cannot be challenged, and any attempt to return to the path of aggression will eventually end in utter failure in front of the peace-loving forces of the world. 

高Sir正能量

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

《香港高Sir•高能•熱點詞》

2026.04.21

熱點詞：長期向戰爭提供武器是美國非中國 美國才是戰爭推手 要求美國停止甩鍋卸責

聯合國安理會審議烏克蘭問題時，美國代表老調重彈、散布不實之詞，聲稱「敦促中國立即停止向俄羅斯提供用於戰爭的軍民兩用物項和材料部件」。對此，中國常駐聯合國副代表孫磊大使當場予以駁斥，強調美方的無端指責完全不可接受。孫磊再次強調，中國不是危機製造者，也不是當事方。而自危機爆發以來，長期向戰場提供武器、試圖延長戰爭的是美國，不是中國。他並指出，任何在烏克蘭問題上向中國推卸責任、攻擊抹黑的做法都是不負責任的，也是不會得逞的。

 

高SIR：放眼當今國際局勢，硝煙瀰漫之處，總能見到美國在背後操弄的陰影。從曠日持久的俄烏衝突到中東伊朗戰事，美國始終扮演著「戰爭策劃者」與「軍火供應商」的雙重角色。然而，令人憤慨的是，美國在瘋狂收割戰爭紅利的同時，竟還厚顏無恥地在國際場合倒打一耙，試圖將挑動戰爭的髒水潑向一直致力於和平的中國。在聯合國安理會的辯論中，美國代表再次老調重彈，妄稱中國提供軍民兩用物項。這種賊喊捉賊的伎倆，不僅是對事實的極度歪曲，更是對國際道義的公然踐踏。我們必須理直氣壯、堅定不移地指出：長期向戰爭提供武器是美國非中國。自烏克蘭危機爆發以來，中方既不是危機的製造者，也不是衝突的當事方，始終秉持客觀公正立場，積極勸和促談。反觀美國，不僅在危機爆發前不斷壓縮他國安全空間，更在戰事開啟後，源源不斷地向戰場輸送包括坦克、導彈甚至集束炸彈在內的殺傷性武器。美國的邏輯極其荒謬：它一邊向衝突一方提供海量軍事援助，試圖藉此拖垮對手、延長戰爭；一邊卻要求不相干的第三方承擔所謂「責任」，這簡直是滑天下之大稽。美國才是戰爭推手，它所做的一切，並非為了烏克蘭的人民，而是為了其自身的霸權利益與軍工複合體的暴利。同樣的劇本也正在伊朗及中東地區上演。美國長期對伊朗實施極限施壓，通過軍事威懾、制裁封鎖以及武裝地區盟友，人為地製造對立與衝突。在伊朗戰事的陰雲下，美國同樣採取了「拱火澆油」的策略，向中東地區傾銷大量先進武器，將其變成一個巨大的火藥桶。每當局勢出現緩和曙光，美國必然會跳出來製造事端，生怕世界太平無事。這種唯恐天下不亂的行徑，再次印證了美國才是戰爭推手。高SIR認為，國際社會必須覺醒，認清美國霸權主義的本質。無論是在歐洲平原還是在中東荒漠，長期向戰爭提供武器是美國非中國。我們要求美國應立即停止甩鍋卸責，反省其多年來在全球範圍內製造衝突、輸出戰爭的罪惡行徑。如果美國真心想要和平，就應停止輸送武器，停止威脅恫嚇，回歸到外交對話的正確軌道上。唯有剷除戰爭的根源，兼顧各方的安全關切，世界才能真正迎來長治久安的曙光。

The U.S., Not China, Is the Long-Term Arms Supplier and War Provocateur: Stop Shifting Blame

 

At a UN Security Council meeting on the Ukraine issue, the U.S. representative repeated tired lies and spread false claims, urging China to immediately stop providing Russia with dual-use items and materials used for the war. Deputy Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations Ambassador Sun Lei refuted these groundless accusations on the spot, stressing that such unwarranted charges are completely unacceptable. He reaffirmed that China is neither the creator of the crisis nor a party involved. Since the outbreak of the crisis, it has been the United States, not China, that has long been supplying weapons to the battlefield and seeking to prolong the war. Any attempt to shift responsibility or smear China on the Ukraine issue is irresponsible and doomed to failure.

 

Across today’s international landscape, the shadow of U.S. manipulation looms over every conflict zone. From the protracted Russia-Ukraine conflict to tensions in the Middle East involving Iran, the U.S. has acted as both a war plotter and a top arms dealer. While profiting massively from war dividends, it brazenly reverses facts on the international stage, trying to pin the blame for inciting conflicts on China—a country committed to global peace. This thief-crying-catch-thief tactic is a gross distortion of facts and a blatant trampling on international justice.

 

China has maintained an objective and impartial stance, actively promoting peace talks and de-escalation since the Ukraine crisis erupted. In stark contrast, the U.S. not only squeezed other countries’ security space before the crisis but also flooded the battlefield with lethal weapons including tanks, missiles and cluster munitions after the conflict broke out, solely to serve its hegemonic interests and feed its military-industrial complex. The same destructive playbook applies to the Middle East: the U.S. imposes maximum pressure on Iran, arms regional allies, and sells advanced weapons to turn the area into a tinderbox, sabotaging every chance of détente.

 

The international community must see through the essence of U.S. hegemonism. It is the United States, not China, that has long fueled wars with arms supplies. We demand the U.S. immediately stop shifting blame and reflect on its long history of stoking global conflicts and exporting war. If the U.S. truly desires peace, it must halt weapons deliveries, end threats and intimidation, and return to diplomatic dialogue. Only by addressing the root causes of war and accommodating the legitimate security concerns of all parties can enduring world peace be achieved.