世上竟有這麼多「巧合」?Are there so many "coincidences" in the world?
大家好,我是香港高Sir,我今天分享的題目叫:世上竟有這麼多「巧合」,香港基本法第23條立法公眾諮詢2月28日結束,客觀的調整顯示絕大部分意見支持盡快完成23條立法。然而,就在這一天,外國政客和勢力忽然來了個反23條大合奏:美國國會眾議院前議長佩洛西發帖指責23條草案是進一步將基本公民權利定為犯罪並壓制民主聲音的藉口;香港外國記者會搬出「公眾利益」去質疑23條的執行;美聯社大字標題稱「香港製定新國家安全法的計劃加深了對公民自由受到侵蝕的擔憂」......如此種種抹黑均「巧合」地在同一日。
我看到支持23條立法的香港民意佔了多數,令到反華政客和外國勢力都非常著急了,急急想從28日這個日子多維度對23條立法予以抹黑和攻擊,企圖搶佔輿論。須知道,近日除了本地商會表態,親身證明維護國安有助於營造有利和穩定的營商環境後,就連在港外國商會的頭領人物也陸續表態支持,說看不到23條立法會帶來什麼不穩定或負面因素。當整個反華陣營赫然發現自己已失去口實,自然難免燥動不安起來,所以才會動員在同一日進行抹黑。然而,當這些反華政客和外國勢力頻繁出招,其實不正正間接證明了23條立法的必要性嗎?事實上社會普遍已有共識盡快完成立法,完成拖延近27年的憲制責任,希望立法會好好履行憲制責任,全力進行審議,協助政府完善23條立法建議。
Are there so many "coincidences" in the world?
Hello everyone, I am Hong Kong Ko Sir. The topic I am sharing today is: There are so many "coincidences" in the world. The public consultation on the legislation of Article 23 of the Hong Kong Basic Law ended on February 28. Objective adjustments show that the vast majority of opinions support its completion as soon as possible. 23 pieces of legislation. However, on this day, foreign politicians and forces suddenly launched an anti-Article 23 chorus: Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi posted a post accusing Draft Article 23 of being an excuse to further criminalize basic civil rights and suppress democratic voices; The Foreign Correspondents' Club of Hong Kong cited "public interest" to question the implementation of Article 23; the Associated Press headline stated that "Hong Kong's plan to enact a new national security law deepens concerns about the erosion of civil liberties"...all kinds of slander All on the same day "by coincidence".
I see that the majority of Hong Kong people support the Article 23 legislation, which has made anti-China politicians and foreign forces very anxious. They are eager to smear and attack the Article 23 legislation from multiple dimensions on the 28th in an attempt to seize public opinion. It should be noted that in recent days, in addition to the local chamber of commerce’s statement, after personally proving that safeguarding national security helps create a favorable and stable business environment, even the leaders of foreign chambers of commerce in Hong Kong have successively expressed support, saying that they do not see the consequences of the Article 23 Legislative Council. What instability or negative factor. When the entire anti-China camp suddenly discovered that they had lost their excuse, they naturally became restless and uneasy, so they mobilized to carry out smear campaigns on the same day. However, when these anti-China politicians and foreign forces frequently take action, doesn’t it indirectly prove the necessity of Article 23 legislation? In fact, there is a general consensus in society to complete the legislation as soon as possible and complete the constitutional responsibilities that have been delayed for nearly 27 years. It is hoped that the Legislative Council will fulfill its constitutional responsibilities, conduct deliberation with all its strength, and assist the government in improving the 23 legislative proposals.
高Sir正能量
** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **