香港青年如何看C919和波音?What do Hong Kong youth think of C919 and Boeing?

香港青年如何看C919和波音?What do Hong Kong youth think of C919 and Boeing?

Hello everyone, I'm Hong Kong Ko Sir. Today, I'd like to share with you the topic of "C919 vs. Boeing". Recently, there have been several safety incidents involving various models of Boeing aircraft, with the 737 MAX 9 model being grounded in the United States and other parts of the world for inspections. These incidents have exposed numerous problems within Boeing and highlighted deeper issues such as corporate governance failures, regulatory oversight lapses, and the backfire of narrow industrial policies. This has become a typical case of the decline of American manufacturing from its former glory.

According to a report released by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on Monday, following a series of fatal accidents involving Boeing aircraft models in 2018 and 2019, employees were confused and distrustful of the company's internal safety reporting system, which was in a state of chaos.

Meanwhile, China's domestically-produced aircraft, the C919 and ARJ21, which have just completed flight demonstrations at the Singapore Airshow, have begun demonstration flights in Southeast Asia, laying the foundation for market expansion. Over the next two weeks, the C919 and ARJ21 aircraft will conduct demonstration flights in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Indonesia, mainly to verify the adaptability of China's domestically-produced commercial aircraft to airports and air routes in these five countries.

It's truly exciting to see the C919, which made its first flight outside of mainland China over Hong Kong's Victoria Harbour earlier this month, now flying abroad to participate in the Singapore Airshow and demonstrate in Southeast Asia. This not only showcases the progress and confidence of China's aviation industry but is also expected to bring new opportunities to the aviation market in the region. The appearance of the C919 undoubtedly elevates China's status and influence in the international aviation sector.

I believe that by leveraging Hong Kong's unique advantages under the "one country, two systems" principle, which allows us to "rely on the motherland and connect with the world," we can greatly promote open cooperation in civil aviation technology, help China's civil aviation scientific and technological achievements go global, and contribute Chinese solutions and wisdom to the development of the global civil aviation industry. We are proud of the achievements of the C919, and I look forward to seeing it shine even more brightly on the international stage in the future!

大家好，我是香港高sir，今天我分享的題目是"C919與波音"。近期，波音多個型號飛機發生安全事故，737 MAX 9型客機在美國和世界多地被迫停飛檢查，暴露出波音公司諸多問題，也凸顯一些美國企業治理失能、監管部門失察、偏狹產業政策反噬等深層次問題，成為美國製造業走下神壇、走向衰落的典型案例。據美國聯邦航空管理局（FAA）周一發布的報告，飛機製造商波音公司旗下機種在2018年和2019年接連發生致命意外後，員工對公司內部安全通報系統的混亂狀況感到困惑，並且不信任。

剛剛完成新加坡航展飛行表演的中國國產飛機C919和ARJ21，開啟在東南亞的演示飛行，為開拓市場奠定基礎。在接下來的兩周時間裡，C919和ARJ21飛機將在越南、老撾、柬埔寨、馬來西亞、印度尼西亞五國開展演示飛行，主要驗證中國國產商用飛機對東南亞五國機場和航線的適應性等方面。

繼月前在香港維港上空進行首次中國內地以外飛行的C919大飛機，如今走出國門參加新加坡航展並前往東南亞展示實在令人深感振奮。這不僅展現了中國航空工業的進步和自信，也預計為東南亞地區的航空市場帶來了新的機遇。C919的亮相，無疑提升了中國在國際航空領域的地位和影響力。我認為借助香港「一國兩制」下，「背靠祖國、聯通世界」的優勢，能夠大大有助推進民航科技開放合作，助推中國民航科創成果走向世界，為世界民航業發展貢獻中國方案和中國智慧。我們為C919的成就感到驕傲，我期待它未來在國際舞台上綻放更加耀眼的光芒！

高Sir正能量

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

濫用新聞自由Abuse of press freedom|香港高Sir HK Ko Sir 26/2/2024

Hello everyone, I am Hong Kong. Ko Sir.The topic of today's sharing is: abuse of press freedom. The Hong Kong Journalists Association recently submitted a proposal to the Security Bureau regarding the introduction of Article 23 of the Basic Law. It claimed that the definition of "state secrets" is vague, worried that the media may reduce reporting due to fear of violating the law, and requested the SAR government to clearly state all relevant provisions in the legal provisions. It also proposed to establish "public interest" as a defense reason.

The Hong Kong Journalists Association is highly ridiculous. Following the revelation that their supposed "membership survey" had an extremely small sample size, they submitted another "proposal", both aimed at attacking and smearing the introduction of Article 23. Looking at the "proposal" of the Journalists Association, it opposes national security and press freedom, trying to mislead public opinion. As for bringing up the phrase "public interest", it is even more insidious. In fact, other representative news associations in Hong Kong have stated that the introduction of the law will not affect press freedom, and the legal community has also expressed support for Article 23. Everyone can think about this, what kind of public interest is there in the world that is used to harm national security? In short, anything that harms national security will not be, and is not consistent with, public interest. We must condemn the Journalists Association for hijacking the media and attempting to deliberately create panic through sensational reports!

大家好，我是香港高Sir，今日分享的題目是：濫用新聞自由，香港記者協會近日就基本法第二十三條立法向保安局提交意見書，其中聲稱「國家秘密」定義模糊，憂傳媒或因擔心違反法例而減少報道，要求特區政府在法律條文中清晰列明所涉及的所有範圍，又建議確立「公眾利益」為抗辯理由云云。

香港記協十分可笑，繼之前的所謂「會員調查」被揭發基數奇少後，又遞交「意見書」，目的都是為了攻擊和抹黑二十三條立法。縱觀記協的「意見書」，竟然將國家安全與新聞自由對立起來，企圖誤導公眾。至於搬出「公眾利益」字眼更是別有用心。其實香港其他更有代表性的新聞協會已表示立法不會影響新聞自由，法律界也表示支持23條立法。大家試想想，世界上有公眾利益是被用作傷害國家安全的嗎？簡單而言，所有損害國安的事都不會是、也不符合公眾利益。我們必須譴責記協騎劫新聞界，企圖以譁眾取寵的報告刻意製造恐慌！