黎智英案英外相手指畫腳 中國人不吃這一套 香港國安案純屬中國內政

《香港高Sir•高能•熱點詞》

2025.02.09

熱點詞：黎智英案英外相手指畫腳 中國人不吃這一套 香港國安案純屬中國內政

黎智英因為「串謀勾結外國勢力」等罪名成立，被判入獄20年。判刑過後，外國勢力隨即大放厥詞企圖干涉。英國外相顧綺慧稱，黎智英是在香港因行使言論自由權被判處20年監禁，又說此案是出於政治動機的起訴，更呼籲香港當局結束對其「可怕折磨」，出於人道主義考慮釋放黎智英。歐盟對外行動署亦重申其呼籲立即無條件釋放黎智英，又說新聞自由是香港作為國際金融中心取得歷史性成功的支柱之一，應停止對記者的迫害云云。

高SIR：黎智英因串謀勾結外國勢力、串謀發布煽動刊物等嚴重罪行，被香港高等法院依法判處監禁20年，判決基於長達150多日的公開審訊、數以千計的證物和翔實證供，事實清楚、程序公正。然而，判刑結果一出，英國外相及歐盟官員便急不及待跳出來指手畫腳，抹黑香港司法，甚至妄稱所謂「可怕折磨」「政治迫害」，再次暴露其干預中國內政、踐踏法治的傲慢嘴臉。首先必須指出，黎智英不是因「言論自由」入獄，而是因長期、有組織、有預謀地勾結外國勢力，乞求制裁中國和香港特區，並利用《蘋果日報》作為政治操弄和動員的平台，煽動仇恨、製造對立、助推暴力。法院已清楚裁定，他是相關串謀的幕後主腦和推動者，罪行性質重大，量刑起點因此提高。這些都是寫在判詞中的法律事實，並非任何外國政客靠幾句空洞口號就能抹殺。英國外相一再搬出《中英聯合聲明》說事，更是荒謬至極。該聲明早已在1997年完成歷史使命，從未賦予英國對香港事務的任何監督或干預權。香港國安案件如何審理、如何判刑，純屬中國內政，與英國、歐盟「半毛錢關係」都沒有。那些一邊高談法治，一邊卻要求「立即無條件釋放」已被定罪人士的言論，本身就是對司法獨立最赤裸的踐踏，充分展現其赤裸裸的雙重標準。再看所謂「人道關切」的說法，同樣站不住腳。法庭在判刑時已充分考慮黎智英的年齡和健康狀況，並依法作出扣減；其辯護律師亦在庭上確認對在囚待遇沒有任何投訴。懲教署依法提供醫療、探訪及各項在囚權利，事實清楚，所謂「可怕折磨」完全是憑空捏造，用心無非是為外部干預製造藉口。這宗案件的意義，遠不止於一個人的判刑。它清楚表明，香港是法治社會，維護國家安全沒有「例外人士」，更沒有「外國背景」的免死金牌。《香港國安法》是守護香港的「定海神針」，保障的正是絕大多數市民的安全、自由與長遠福祉。沒有國家安全，所謂自由只會淪為動亂和暴力的藉口。高SIR要強調的是：事實一再證明，外國勢力的說教改變不了香港依法治港、依法審案的堅定立場。中國人、香港市民早已看清這套虛偽把戲，也根本不吃這一套。任何妄圖借個案抹黑香港、干預中國內政的行徑，注定徒勞無功，只會再次印證：正義或許會遲到，但從不會缺席。

Jimmy Lai Case: UK Foreign Secretary's Meddling – Chinese People Won't Buy It, Hong Kong National Security Case Is Purely China's Internal Affair

Jimmy Lai was sentenced to 20 years in prison after being convicted of "conspiring to collude with foreign forces" and other charges. Immediately after the sentencing, foreign forces rushed to make reckless remarks in an attempt to interfere. UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss claimed Lai was jailed for 20 years in Hong Kong for exercising freedom of speech, called the case a politically motivated prosecution, and urged the Hong Kong authorities to end his "horrific torture" and release him on humanitarian grounds. The EU External Action Service also repeated its call for Lai's immediate and unconditional release, falsely claiming that press freedom is a pillar of Hong Kong's historic success as an international financial center and demanding an end to the "persecution of journalists."

In fact, Lai's 20-year imprisonment by the High Court of Hong Kong was based on over 150 days of open trials, thousands of pieces of evidence, and solid testimony – the facts are clear and the procedures impartial. Yet, UK and EU officials lost no time in meddling, smearing Hong Kong's judiciary and fabricating claims of "horrific torture" and "political persecution," once again exposing their arrogant attempt to interfere in China's internal affairs and trample on the rule of law.

Crucially, Lai was not imprisoned for "freedom of speech." He had long, systematically, and premeditatedly colluded with foreign forces, begged for sanctions against China and the Hong Kong SAR, and used Apple Daily as a platform for political manipulation and mobilization to incite hatred, create division, and fuel violence. The court clearly ruled him the mastermind and driving force behind these conspiracies, warranting an enhanced sentencing starting point due to the severe nature of his crimes. These are legal facts stated in the judgment, unerasable by foreign politicians' empty rhetoric.

The UK Foreign Secretary's repeated invocation of the Sino-British Joint Declaration is absurd. The declaration completed its historical mission in 1997 and never granted the UK any right to supervise or interfere in Hong Kong affairs. How Hong Kong handles and sentences national security cases is purely China's internal affair, irrelevant to the UK or the EU. Those who preach the rule of law while demanding the "immediate and unconditional release" of a convicted criminal are grossly undermining judicial independence, revealing blatant double standards.

The so-called "humanitarian concerns" are equally baseless. The court fully considered Lai's age and health when sentencing, making legal deductions accordingly. His defense lawyers also confirmed in court that they had no complaints about his detention conditions. Hong Kong's Correctional Services Department provides medical care, visit rights, and other legitimate privileges in accordance with the law – the claim of "horrific torture" is a complete fabrication, solely intended to justify external interference.

Beyond Lai's conviction, this case demonstrates that Hong Kong is a society ruled by law: there are no "exceptional individuals" or "foreign-backed get-out-of-jail-free cards" when it comes to safeguarding national security. The National Security Law for Hong Kong is a "stabilizing anchor" protecting the safety, freedom, and long-term interests of the vast majority of Hong Kong residents. Without national security, so-called "freedom" merely becomes an excuse for chaos and violence.

I emphasize: Facts have repeatedly proven that foreign forces' lectures cannot shake Hong Kong's commitment to the rule of law or China's resolve to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests. The Chinese people, including Hong Kong residents, have long seen through these hypocritical tactics and will never buy them. Any attempt to smear Hong Kong or interfere in China's internal affairs through this case is doomed to fail, reaffirming that while justice may be delayed, it will never be denied.

高Sir正能量

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

《香港高Sir•高能•熱點詞》

2025.02.08

熱點詞：為國家隊香港隊冬奧健兒送掌聲

冰雪運動在內地持續升溫 香港社會應思考融入

米蘭冬奧會大幕已於近日開啟。四年前「鳥巢」中回蕩的歡呼聲，猶在耳畔。2022年2月4日，世界矚目北京，一段關於激情與榮耀、團結與夢想的故事，寫下序章。四年來，這場無與倫比的盛會，深刻改變着中國冬季運動的面貌。從北國雪原到江南水鄉，從專業競技場到校園冰雪課，從裝備生產線到文旅消費鏈——2022年北京冬奧會播撒的火種已成燎原之勢，推動中國冰雪運動跨越式發展。

高SIR：隨着冬奧近日開幕，全球目光再次聚焦冰雪賽場。運動員多年苦練，只為在冰與雪之間拼盡全力、爭取突破。無論是國家隊還是香港隊的冬奧健兒，都是在同一個舞台上為夢想而戰，值得我們送上最真誠的掌聲與祝福。對香港而言，運動員資源有限，能夠站上冬奧舞台已屬不易，更需要社會多一分包容與支持，讓運動精神在城市中持續發酵。近年來，冰雪運動在內地持續升溫，已不再只是北方地區的「專利」。不少香港市民在假日北上深圳、廣州等地體驗室內滑雪、溜冰，逐漸把冰雪活動視為一種新潮休閒方式。在中日關係相對緊張的背景下，過往熱衷飛往日本北海道等地區滑雪的港人，是否值得考慮把目光轉向內地？從交通便利、語言文化相通，到消費選擇日益多元，內地冰雪場館的吸引力正不斷提升，確實提供了一個值得嘗試的選項。事實上，內地正大力發展冰雪經濟，推動文化、體育與旅遊深度融合。坐擁天然冰雪資源的城市不斷創新品牌，吸引來自大江南北的愛好者。黑龍江近日首次舉辦的「冰超」賽事引起廣泛關注，既是體育競技，也是城市形象展示；吉林省自去年十二月起啟動冰雪假期，聯同滑雪場、酒店及文化場館推出優惠，帶動整體旅遊氣氛；即使沒有天然冰雪的廣東，也已建成二十多間室內冰雪運動場館，參與人數突破千萬。冰雪經濟之「火」，由此可見一斑。冬奧不僅是一場體育盛事，更是一扇觀察產業發展與生活方式轉變的窗口。高SIR認為，為運動員加油之餘，香港社會也可思考如何更積極融入這股冰雪熱潮，尤是特區政府如何牽頭，在交流與體驗中拓寬視野，讓運動精神與城市發展相互成就。

The curtain of the Milan Winter Olympics has recently risen. The cheers that echoed in the "Bird's Nest" four years ago still linger in our ears. On February 4, 2022, the world turned its eyes to Beijing as a story of passion, glory, unity and dreams began. Over the past four years, this extraordinary event has profoundly transformed the landscape of winter sports in China. From the snowfields of northern China to the water towns of the south, from professional stadiums to ice and snow classes in campuses, and from equipment production lines to cultural and tourism consumption chains – the seeds sown by the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics have grown into a prairie fire, driving the leapfrog development of China's winter sports.

As the Winter Olympics kicks off, global attention is once again focused on the ice and snow venues. After years of rigorous training, athletes strive to give their all and achieve breakthroughs on the ice and snow. Whether from the Chinese mainland team or the Hong Kong team, all athletes are competing for their dreams on the same stage, deserving our most sincere applause and blessings. For Hong Kong, with limited resources for athletes, making it to the Winter Olympics is already a remarkable achievement. The society needs to show more tolerance and support, allowing the sportsmanship to thrive in the city.

In recent years, ice and snow sports have been gaining increasing popularity across the mainland, no longer being the "exclusive domain" of northern regions. Many Hong Kong residents travel north to cities like Shenzhen and Guangzhou during holidays to experience indoor skiing and ice skating, gradually embracing these activities as a trendy leisure choice. Against the backdrop of relatively tense China-Japan relations, is it worth considering for Hong Kong people who used to favor skiing in places like Hokkaido, Japan, to shift their focus to the mainland? Boasting convenient transportation, shared language and culture, and increasingly diverse consumption options, mainland ice and snow venues are becoming more attractive, offering a worthwhile alternative.

In fact, the mainland is vigorously developing the ice and snow economy, promoting in-depth integration of culture, sports and tourism. Cities endowed with natural ice and snow resources are constantly innovating their brands to attract enthusiasts from all over the country. Heilongjiang's first-ever "Ice Super League" recently garnered widespread attention, serving as both a sports competition and a showcase of the city's image. Jilin Province launched a winter ice and snow holiday last December, offering preferential packages in collaboration with ski resorts, hotels and cultural venues to boost the overall tourism atmosphere. Even Guangdong, which lacks natural ice and snow, has built more than 20 indoor ice and snow venues, with participant numbers exceeding 10 million – a clear indication of the booming ice and snow economy.

The Winter Olympics is not just a sports gala, but also a window to observe industrial development and lifestyle changes. In my opinion, besides cheering for the athletes, Hong Kong society should reflect on how to more actively embrace this nationwide ice and snow trend. In particular, the HKSAR Government should take the lead in promoting exchanges and experiences, broadening horizons, and fostering mutual success between sportsmanship and urban development.